Agree on Who dat and the Pack ...
I cant make a case for either Jets and Colts, the hardest game for me to cap, I mean two weeks ago Jay Cutler looked like Joe Montana and picked apart the Jets defense, guess what Manning could do, besides Peyton loves to be blitzed, and you bet Rex Ryan will blitz Peyton a lot ...
In Chiefs case, you said Balty was overrated but guess what for me the overrated team is KC, just one win against a winning team: Chargers and that was in Week One ... for me, the Chiefs is the classic team that took advantage of its soft schedule, and they couldnt even take care of its division with a 2 - 4 record, Oakland just kicked KC ass at Arrowhead, just hard for me to support an overrated team ...
GL URISS !!! 
1) Statistically the Chiefs are better offensively but are nowhere close defensively when it comes to rush defense and scoring defense so I don't see how you can give any sort of statistics advantage to the Chiefs. And to call the 3rd ranked scoring defense overrated when they have played the likes of the Pats, Steelers (twice), Saints, Falcons, Jets, etc. while looking at KC's opposition is a joke. Cassel and Flacco's numbers are nearly identical so any type of QB comparison is a wash.
2) The Ravens are a veteran group with a ton of playoff experience. This same team walked into Foxboro last year and laid the smack down on the Pats. If anybody is going to have playoff jitters its the young Chiefs squad with almost no playoff experience. This Ravens team can play anywhere don't kid yourself.
3) Jamaal Charles is 2nd in the NFL in rushing but you failed to mentioned the Ravens 5th ranked rush D which is their strength. A staunch run D can always limit an opponents running attack no matter who it is. You don't think the game plan for the Ravens is to shut down the Charles/Jones combo and put the game in the hands of Cassel? And please don't tell me they are not capable of doing so. You of all people should know this as I have read enough of your posts to respect your opinions on games.
4) Yes Flacco will have to worry about Hali but what about the other side? You think Cassel is better suited to deal with Lewis, Reed, Ngata, Suggs, etc. Flacco has the better weapons at his disposal and has to do it against a defense that is not nearly as daunting as the Ravens.
BOL on your play with the Chiefs. Obviously I will be on the other side...
1) Statistically the Chiefs are better offensively but are nowhere close defensively when it comes to rush defense and scoring defense so I don't see how you can give any sort of statistics advantage to the Chiefs. And to call the 3rd ranked scoring defense overrated when they have played the likes of the Pats, Steelers (twice), Saints, Falcons, Jets, etc. while looking at KC's opposition is a joke. Cassel and Flacco's numbers are nearly identical so any type of QB comparison is a wash.
2) The Ravens are a veteran group with a ton of playoff experience. This same team walked into Foxboro last year and laid the smack down on the Pats. If anybody is going to have playoff jitters its the young Chiefs squad with almost no playoff experience. This Ravens team can play anywhere don't kid yourself.
3) Jamaal Charles is 2nd in the NFL in rushing but you failed to mentioned the Ravens 5th ranked rush D which is their strength. A staunch run D can always limit an opponents running attack no matter who it is. You don't think the game plan for the Ravens is to shut down the Charles/Jones combo and put the game in the hands of Cassel? And please don't tell me they are not capable of doing so. You of all people should know this as I have read enough of your posts to respect your opinions on games.
4) Yes Flacco will have to worry about Hali but what about the other side? You think Cassel is better suited to deal with Lewis, Reed, Ngata, Suggs, etc. Flacco has the better weapons at his disposal and has to do it against a defense that is not nearly as daunting as the Ravens.
BOL on your play with the Chiefs. Obviously I will be on the other side...
That old Ravens D gave up 2 points a game more than that great Steeler D....
Ravens lost 4 games this year...the most by 5 points.....
Late leads lost @ NE....@ Atl....H to Steelers....and a bad game early vs the Bengals that cost the Ravens the division....
You liked the Saints @ Bmore...got their asses pounded,you got upset over the Ravens beating your +3.5 line on that late FG by Cundiff....
The Ravens will show the Chefs whats cookin on Sunday and it will be their carcasses....
RatherBGamblin you better hope the Ravens lose,because we have some unfinished business with your Pats...
....
....N.O. yes.
....you surprize me here. I really thought when I clicked your thread you have Baltimore. But I'll go with ya on this one. I can't put my money on a team that looks the way Balt; does moving down the field. When they don't score much it makes sense to me. When they do score, they just look confused and fortunate to get the plays off in time and on point. However, can KC run against Balt;? Can Castle do enough to win this game? Can Balt; score more then 17? They'll need to to win. JMO.
That old Ravens D gave up 2 points a game more than that great Steeler D....
Ravens lost 4 games this year...the most by 5 points.....
Late leads lost @ NE....@ Atl....H to Steelers....and a bad game early vs the Bengals that cost the Ravens the division....
You liked the Saints @ Bmore...got their asses pounded,you got upset over the Ravens beating your +3.5 line on that late FG by Cundiff....
The Ravens will show the Chefs whats cookin on Sunday and it will be their carcasses....
RatherBGamblin you better hope the Ravens lose,because we have some unfinished business with your Pats...
By 6 points I believe, and they had a chance to score on a last minute drive, that doesn't sound like a beat down just my opinion.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
