now they lost nicks, apparently their best receiver Gbay will win probably , at least they play at same time. the giants is finished, still laying 4 points i dont care, i wont put penny on the giants, lets say they cover the -4 , good for the G takers, for now i see zero reason to take the giants even at pickem, i wont risk a penny.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
now they lost nicks, apparently their best receiver Gbay will win probably , at least they play at same time. the giants is finished, still laying 4 points i dont care, i wont put penny on the giants, lets say they cover the -4 , good for the G takers, for now i see zero reason to take the giants even at pickem, i wont risk a penny.
If Green Bay win against the Chicago Bears, then they will be IN regardless of the outcomes from NY Giants and Tampa Bay (tie breaker against Giants, better schedule strength against Tampa Bay).
They might just lost the game outright!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
0
If Green Bay win against the Chicago Bears, then they will be IN regardless of the outcomes from NY Giants and Tampa Bay (tie breaker against Giants, better schedule strength against Tampa Bay).
They might just lost the game outright!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Rex hasn't imploded in his 2 games, but he's been far from good. This game represents a big step down in opposing QB for the G-Men compared to the 2 previous games. Giants should win a close, low-scoring game regardless of Nicks being out. If G-Men can turn-over Rex, they might run away with it.
0
Rex hasn't imploded in his 2 games, but he's been far from good. This game represents a big step down in opposing QB for the G-Men compared to the 2 previous games. Giants should win a close, low-scoring game regardless of Nicks being out. If G-Men can turn-over Rex, they might run away with it.
"someone give me any reason to bet the giants this weekend"
1) now they lost nicks, apparently their best receiver( he is their best WR)
2) Gbay will win probably , at least they play at same time.------------ WTF does thii wont put penny on the giants, s mean??? you state they will win then say probably? which one is it-they will win or probably win???
3)i wont put penny on the giants,
4) even at pickem, i wont risk a penny.
I DON'T UNDERSTAND THIS THREAD-- YOUR TITLE STATES SOMEONE PLEASE GIVE ME A REASON TO BET THE GIANTS BUT YOU STATE TWICE THAT YOU WONT PUT PENNY ON THE GIANTS OR EVEN AT PICKEM, I WONT RISK PENNY
WHY DO YOU WANT SOMEONE TO TELL YOU TO A REASON ON A GAME YOU WON'T BET???????
0
"someone give me any reason to bet the giants this weekend"
1) now they lost nicks, apparently their best receiver( he is their best WR)
2) Gbay will win probably , at least they play at same time.------------ WTF does thii wont put penny on the giants, s mean??? you state they will win then say probably? which one is it-they will win or probably win???
3)i wont put penny on the giants,
4) even at pickem, i wont risk a penny.
I DON'T UNDERSTAND THIS THREAD-- YOUR TITLE STATES SOMEONE PLEASE GIVE ME A REASON TO BET THE GIANTS BUT YOU STATE TWICE THAT YOU WONT PUT PENNY ON THE GIANTS OR EVEN AT PICKEM, I WONT RISK PENNY
WHY DO YOU WANT SOMEONE TO TELL YOU TO A REASON ON A GAME YOU WON'T BET???????
now they lost nicks, apparently their best receiver Gbay will win probably , at least they play at same time. the giants is finished, still laying 4 points i dont care, i wont put penny on the giants, lets say they cover the -4 , good for the G takers, for now i see zero reason to take the giants even at pickem, i wont risk a penny.
Why don't you change the thread title to my reasons to take the Redskins.
0
Quote Originally Posted by kevinkim:
now they lost nicks, apparently their best receiver Gbay will win probably , at least they play at same time. the giants is finished, still laying 4 points i dont care, i wont put penny on the giants, lets say they cover the -4 , good for the G takers, for now i see zero reason to take the giants even at pickem, i wont risk a penny.
Why don't you change the thread title to my reasons to take the Redskins.
you want someone to change YOUR Mind about The Redskins
Thats who YOU like +4 points
1st of all i would stay away from this game
Because G men need help FROM Bears @ GB
which we already see by the increased spread That Bears are pulling starters fast
they were a 5 1/2 DOG now they are as high as 11 1/2 pt dog
so once Giants see packers romping the Bears they will know that they have no shot to make the playoffs
Because YOUR WC teams already are in the NFC
Packers and saints
Saints playing at 1 PM Vs Bucs
Giants will already Know results of That Game
They NEED a small miracle to happen BOTH packers and saints
have TO LOSE for Giants to get in and GO nowhere because this is thier 2nd st road Game and they shoul realize that even if make playoffs they arent making to the superbowl because that would be FIVE ST games on THE Road
0
ok i see your thread
you want someone to change YOUR Mind about The Redskins
Thats who YOU like +4 points
1st of all i would stay away from this game
Because G men need help FROM Bears @ GB
which we already see by the increased spread That Bears are pulling starters fast
they were a 5 1/2 DOG now they are as high as 11 1/2 pt dog
so once Giants see packers romping the Bears they will know that they have no shot to make the playoffs
Because YOUR WC teams already are in the NFC
Packers and saints
Saints playing at 1 PM Vs Bucs
Giants will already Know results of That Game
They NEED a small miracle to happen BOTH packers and saints
have TO LOSE for Giants to get in and GO nowhere because this is thier 2nd st road Game and they shoul realize that even if make playoffs they arent making to the superbowl because that would be FIVE ST games on THE Road
Giants hardly layed down last week. It was tied at 14 to 14 and the Pack took the lead at halftime 21-14. Giants lost two fumbles and Eli had 4 interceptions as the game got away from them, but they weren't lacking in effort. They will come to play at Washington whether they need the game or not and make it a long day for Grossman. The Redskins are not the Eagles or the Packers in any way.
0
Giants hardly layed down last week. It was tied at 14 to 14 and the Pack took the lead at halftime 21-14. Giants lost two fumbles and Eli had 4 interceptions as the game got away from them, but they weren't lacking in effort. They will come to play at Washington whether they need the game or not and make it a long day for Grossman. The Redskins are not the Eagles or the Packers in any way.
I am on Giants. They need a W to get into playoffs. They are playing at same time as Bears so they won't know what their fate is until after their game.
0
I am on Giants. They need a W to get into playoffs. They are playing at same time as Bears so they won't know what their fate is until after their game.
you want someone to change YOUR Mind about The Redskins
Thats who YOU like +4 points
1st of all i would stay away from this game
Because G men need help FROM Bears @ GB
which we already see by the increased spread That Bears are pulling starters fast
they were a 5 1/2 DOG now they are as high as 11 1/2 pt dog
so once Giants see packers romping the Bears they will know that they have no shot to make the playoffs
Because YOUR WC teams already are in the NFC
Packers and saints
Saints playing at 1 PM Vs Bucs
Giants will already Know results of That Game
They NEED a small miracle to happen BOTH packers and saints
have TO LOSE for Giants to get in and GO nowhere because this is thier 2nd st road Game and they shoul realize that even if make playoffs they arent making to the superbowl because that would be FIVE ST games on THE Road
The scenario you laid out is correct. When the Chi/GB game starts, Chi will probably have no motive to win, which is why the line is so high, and everything points to GB getting the victory. Sooo, if what you laid out is so apparent and probably will happen .... then why are the G-Men favored by 3.5 in Wash? It's because even with a matchup of pride-vs-pride, the G-Men are the better team. Now, that said, the G-Men's D-Line needs to get it going in the upcoming game, and unfortunately the D-Line is really banged up. But, Osi and Tuck will be out there. Canty and Tollefson, maybe not.
0
Quote Originally Posted by dawniewags:
ok i see your thread
you want someone to change YOUR Mind about The Redskins
Thats who YOU like +4 points
1st of all i would stay away from this game
Because G men need help FROM Bears @ GB
which we already see by the increased spread That Bears are pulling starters fast
they were a 5 1/2 DOG now they are as high as 11 1/2 pt dog
so once Giants see packers romping the Bears they will know that they have no shot to make the playoffs
Because YOUR WC teams already are in the NFC
Packers and saints
Saints playing at 1 PM Vs Bucs
Giants will already Know results of That Game
They NEED a small miracle to happen BOTH packers and saints
have TO LOSE for Giants to get in and GO nowhere because this is thier 2nd st road Game and they shoul realize that even if make playoffs they arent making to the superbowl because that would be FIVE ST games on THE Road
The scenario you laid out is correct. When the Chi/GB game starts, Chi will probably have no motive to win, which is why the line is so high, and everything points to GB getting the victory. Sooo, if what you laid out is so apparent and probably will happen .... then why are the G-Men favored by 3.5 in Wash? It's because even with a matchup of pride-vs-pride, the G-Men are the better team. Now, that said, the G-Men's D-Line needs to get it going in the upcoming game, and unfortunately the D-Line is really banged up. But, Osi and Tuck will be out there. Canty and Tollefson, maybe not.
There is a revenge factor to consider here too. I think Washington comes out with Rex throwing and throwing often. In their last game McNabb was horrible. I don't think Rex will stink it up that bad. Its a field goal game here.
0
There is a revenge factor to consider here too. I think Washington comes out with Rex throwing and throwing often. In their last game McNabb was horrible. I don't think Rex will stink it up that bad. Its a field goal game here.
That playoff scenario is incorrect.. All the Giants need is a Packers loss and a win vs the Redskins and they are in regardless of the out come of the Bucs/Saints.. Saints already clinched the one Wild Card.. Giants hold tie breaker over Bucs but lose tie breaker to Pack.. Therefore all they need is Pack to lose and to beat Skins.. I realize asking the Bears to beat the Pack in Green Bay is a tall task, but just thought I'd clear that up
0
That playoff scenario is incorrect.. All the Giants need is a Packers loss and a win vs the Redskins and they are in regardless of the out come of the Bucs/Saints.. Saints already clinched the one Wild Card.. Giants hold tie breaker over Bucs but lose tie breaker to Pack.. Therefore all they need is Pack to lose and to beat Skins.. I realize asking the Bears to beat the Pack in Green Bay is a tall task, but just thought I'd clear that up
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.