Pittsburgh @ Cleveland

Question

Pittsburgh/Cleveland Under 34 (8)&#xD;&#xA;Slight lean to the Browns....may add, especially if I can get 10.5.

CalBear · Answer

Pittsburgh/Cleveland Under 34 (8)&#xD;&#xA;Slight lean to the Browns....may add, especially if I can get 10.5.

Wizerguy · Answer

GLCal

choiOi · Answer

BOL bud...

choiOi · Answer

That UNDER imo is probably the best bet in this game.

bkg1010 · Answer

Steelers can&#x27;t beat the lowly Raiders, the Browns should be able to keep it close,  MAYBE ??    GL

JackSmack · Answer

holy crap 34? I figured it was around 40.&#xD;&#xA;Wow, ive def read this game all wrong, although every thursday is a shitfest

CalBear · Answer

Thanks and GL fellas. &#xD;&#xA;My thoughts on this play has all to do with the wind.  Many are mentioning the snow and or rain, but that is irrelevant.  What is relevant are strong winds between 30-35 mph and wind gusts over 40 mph.  There is a reason this total is so low.  As I explained earlier, this game sets up to be like the NE/Buff game during week 17 last year, when wind gusts reached over 50 mph.  In this game the total was set at 35 and the final score was 13-0.  Both teams played ultra conservative, not wanting to risk ints., accounting for a combined 33 passes and 82 rushes between the two!  I look for the same Thursday night.  Unless we get multiple special teams and defensive TD, I don&#x27;t see the under even being threatened....maybe 20-24 pts total.

RipVanWinkle · Answer

The last time a Steelers/Browns game had winds of over 18 mph was last year on SNF Pitt 10-6 Cleveland. Anyone who tells me you can throw a ball downfield consistently in those conditions is nuts, i know you cant be over confident but this wont even be close. I would not be suprised if Pitt won 12-0, with 2 or more missed field goals in the game.

managerdent · Answer

yeah i couldnt agree with you guys more. Under is definately going to be a huge play for me. my local has the total at 39.5 and im going to pound that shit. also may play the browns &#x2B;`10.5

CalBear · Answer

Rip- Good analogy with LY match-up and these conditions will be worse. GL

Manage- 39.5 is insane...personally I wouldn't even risk the Cleve. play if I had a total of 39.5...in fact, Id probably just add more to the under or leave the under as is. GL

jackietnle · Answer

You got it right.......

URISS2302 · Answer

GL CAL

managerdent · Answer

So just pound the under you think. i am a small wagering guy so i will probably just bet 48 to win 40 on the under after i check the weather report again tomorrow morning.

mobcapper · Answer

wow, most people are on the Over for the pitt/clev game

5time786 · Answer

The Steelers beat the Browns 10-6 in their first of two meetings last year. The teams had to deal with winds that gusted up to 50 MPH during this wet, rainy game in Cleveland. The Steelers established their dominance early on defense. During the 1st half, the Browns had to punt on their first 4 drives. Then, on their next two drives, Derek Anderson threw two consecutive interceptions.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA; CalBear

2sad2say · Answer

.....me too I like the the wind factor....the lack of it due to the venue (no methane due to no cheese steak subs) should ALLOW the brownies to focus on keeping the game close if nothing else but global warming NOT....gimme those points..!!!!

jerryjr · Answer

r u sure under  on browns/ steelers game winds 30, windchill 0

fyugioh · Answer

under

Louis_IV · Answer

be careful here....the line has come down 4 or 5 points off the open to 33.  The adjustment for wather has been made.  Its an under or no play for me, but I certainly liked the under pre-line drop far better when at 38/39. i could see this game middle at 34/35.  People in early on under hit all the aholes that come in late lose...

ChuyenTinhDenDo · Answer

gl Cal

CalBear · Answer

&#xD;&#xA;I&#x27;m just saying, if you can get 39.5, there is so much value in playing the under why would you risk any part of that with another play.

CalBear · Answer

Thx and GL all

Pittsburgh @ Cleveland

Hot Forum Topics