Imagine this...it is 2009 and for 400 years we have been using a derogatory, almost infantile, term to describe a man's skin...but they weren't men, in the eyes of colonizers...they were savages, barbarians, uncivil, uncouth, uncultured, filthy, repulsive, hideous, objectionable animals...singled out, by not by the whites of their eyes that they share with every human, but by a thin layer of epidermis, incorrectly and ignorantly pointed out as RED...fucking RED??? whose fucking skin is red??? this emoticon is red but that ain't no fuckin' indian face! and who's hair is red by the way? Danny Bonaduce's mutherfucking hair on the Partridge Family WAS ORANGE not RED...so goes the primitive mind of the enemy...and today, in keeping this name we carry on the grossly racist lexicon of our ancestors...
Imagine this...it is 2009 and for 400 years we have been using a derogatory, almost infantile, term to describe a man's skin...but they weren't men, in the eyes of colonizers...they were savages, barbarians, uncivil, uncouth, uncultured, filthy, repulsive, hideous, objectionable animals...singled out, by not by the whites of their eyes that they share with every human, but by a thin layer of epidermis, incorrectly and ignorantly pointed out as RED...fucking RED??? whose fucking skin is red??? this emoticon is red but that ain't no fuckin' indian face! and who's hair is red by the way? Danny Bonaduce's mutherfucking hair on the Partridge Family WAS ORANGE not RED...so goes the primitive mind of the enemy...and today, in keeping this name we carry on the grossly racist lexicon of our ancestors...
I've been following them for several weeks and I watched them against the Falcons. The game didn't tell the tale of how washington played. If you were on 'em getting 11.5 you got royally screwed. Down 24-3 at the half they could have easily folded. They battled to 24-17 and then completely melted down on a blitz that resulted in a Michael Turner 58 yard TD. 31-17. Worse yet, Campbell gets injured on the next play from offense for Washington, Collins comes in, completely disrupting any offensive flow and the 4th quarter melts away and so does the cover. This week, they return home for the first time after being called out by their owner and $100 million dollar man to face a Broncos team that has gotten SPANKED against REAL competition in Baltimore and Pittsburgh the past two weeks. Really, this team is 5-3 if you reverse the week 1 miracle against Cincy and if not for a 98 yard tying drive against the Pats to tie and then win in overtime, is it a .500 team? I'll tell you this. Don't even try to tell me the regrouped Pats team that is playing the Colts this weekend wouldn't shred this Denver team if it were Week 10 when they played. So is this team morphing back into the team we thought they were? I believe so. I see just see more than a field goal as too big a line for a Washington that must come up with a victory NOW. And given the next 3 games are @ dallas, @ philly, and then the Saints at home, Zorn and this team will be putting ALL their time and energy into pulling this one off with however little, but still motivated talent they have. A bad spot for a reeling and still enigmatic Bronco team if they don't win (convincingly?) here. All the pressure on Denver and Orton and it's rookie coach against a motivated Washington team, at home, with more than a field goal cushion if they give away a late lead with the boot...almost 78 % of the public on denver and the line has DROPPED from 4 to 3.5....Therefore, I'll take
MUTHAFUCKIN WASHINGTON +3.5
OVER DENVER
0
I've been following them for several weeks and I watched them against the Falcons. The game didn't tell the tale of how washington played. If you were on 'em getting 11.5 you got royally screwed. Down 24-3 at the half they could have easily folded. They battled to 24-17 and then completely melted down on a blitz that resulted in a Michael Turner 58 yard TD. 31-17. Worse yet, Campbell gets injured on the next play from offense for Washington, Collins comes in, completely disrupting any offensive flow and the 4th quarter melts away and so does the cover. This week, they return home for the first time after being called out by their owner and $100 million dollar man to face a Broncos team that has gotten SPANKED against REAL competition in Baltimore and Pittsburgh the past two weeks. Really, this team is 5-3 if you reverse the week 1 miracle against Cincy and if not for a 98 yard tying drive against the Pats to tie and then win in overtime, is it a .500 team? I'll tell you this. Don't even try to tell me the regrouped Pats team that is playing the Colts this weekend wouldn't shred this Denver team if it were Week 10 when they played. So is this team morphing back into the team we thought they were? I believe so. I see just see more than a field goal as too big a line for a Washington that must come up with a victory NOW. And given the next 3 games are @ dallas, @ philly, and then the Saints at home, Zorn and this team will be putting ALL their time and energy into pulling this one off with however little, but still motivated talent they have. A bad spot for a reeling and still enigmatic Bronco team if they don't win (convincingly?) here. All the pressure on Denver and Orton and it's rookie coach against a motivated Washington team, at home, with more than a field goal cushion if they give away a late lead with the boot...almost 78 % of the public on denver and the line has DROPPED from 4 to 3.5....Therefore, I'll take
i have watched them every single week.... i dont care who they are playing the skins is not a good investment.
well no one would say the nets are a good investment at 0-10 and they should have beaten miami in miami as 13 point dog's tonight barring two miracle 3's in 24 seconds
0
Quote Originally Posted by pickenwinners:
i have watched them every single week.... i dont care who they are playing the skins is not a good investment.
well no one would say the nets are a good investment at 0-10 and they should have beaten miami in miami as 13 point dog's tonight barring two miracle 3's in 24 seconds
My concern is stout Denver Defense vs. inept Washington offense. I wouldn't think Denver has to score too much to win, my line at 4, regardless of color.
0
My concern is stout Denver Defense vs. inept Washington offense. I wouldn't think Denver has to score too much to win, my line at 4, regardless of color.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
this emoticon is red but that ain't no fuckin' indian face! and who's hair is red by the way? Danny Bonaduce's mutherfucking hair on the Partridge Family WAS ORANGE not RED...so goes the primitive mind of the enemy...and today, in keeping this name we carry on the grossly racist lexicon of our ancestors...
Hot Forum Topics
