All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

Redskins 2nd worst team in football?

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 552
Posts: 23
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1549
Posted: #1
What do you guys think. Rams are probably worse.. other than that??? anyone
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 23787
Posted: #2
Rams are better...if they played in STL they would have beat them
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 27235
Posted: #3
Lions (despite the fact that they beat Was), Oak, KC, TB, Tenn. Am I missing someone?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2003
Posts: 929
Posted: #4
It's a coin flip. Detroit, Rams, Oakland and Skins are all terrible.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 529
Posted: #5
Quote Originally Posted by ratherBgambling:

Lions (despite the fact that they beat Was), Oak, KC, TB, Tenn. Am I missing someone?


"Despite the fact" nothing - Lions are better than the Skins.  And Tennessee is pretty much on the same level as them.  You're also missing Cleveland; they're worse than Washington
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2003
Posts: 929
Posted: #6
Oh yea and Tampa and Carolina arent far behind.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1549
Posted: #7

ratherbgambling are you sayign that it is lion oak kc tb tenn?? i will putt tenn ahead of all of those teams anyday. Washington is 100 percent in the top 4 i am just wondering if they are top 2

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 529
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by thatguy7:



"Despite the fact" nothing - Lions are better than the Skins.  And Tennessee is pretty much on the same level as them.  You're also missing Cleveland; they're worse than Washington


Put the Chiefs above the Skins too.  Skins may have much more talent than the Lions, Chiefs, Rams, Bucs, and Panthers, but they are dysfunctional on so many levels.  When you're less than .500 against possibly the 5 worst teams in the league, you are a bad football team.  The Skins are basically like the NFL's version of the '09 Mets.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2005
Posts: 2512
Posted: #9

offensively det has c.johnson and stafford, k.smith to build around.. stl has jackson, maybe avery. ten has a few c.johnson. well thats bout it. washington blows.. management of a football game is absolutely plthetic. 4th q down 17 throwing consecutive 4 year passes in the middle of the field..

redskins.. worst team in league,,, see their stats in bout 6 weeks.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1549
Posted: #10
Quote Originally Posted by smalltimer:

offensively det has c.johnson and stafford, k.smith to build around.. stl has jackson, maybe avery. ten has a few c.johnson. well thats bout it. washington blows.. management of a football game is absolutely plthetic. 4th q down 17 throwing consecutive 4 year passes in the middle of the field..

redskins.. worst team in league,,, see their stats in bout 6 weeks.

harsh words i honestly think they are 2nd or third worst team in the league but this does make me think otherwise

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 300
Posted: #11
How can every1 forget about Cleve and how bad they are? I would go Rams then Cleve, Oak, then Wash

At least Wash has a better D than Oakland
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 19693
Posted: #12
Raiders-fresh off a SHUTOUT AT HOME!

TALK ABOUT A BLACK HOLE!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1549
Posted: #13
dont forget though wash D has played 0 good offensive teams. but clev does suck
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 323
Posted: #14

From worst to best

St Louis - they get near the red zone they just panic and hand it to the other team

Cleve - Eric Mangini enough said

KC - there own players are beginning to question there coach and they blew a 4th qtr lead to oak at home

TB - they couldnt stop Jamarcus Russell if they played

Oak - they have some talent but they have no discipline and Jamarcus actually believes he playing well

Det - there going in the right direction but right now they still suck

Tenn + Wash Tie - both have some talent, injuries are killing Tenn in the secondary and Wash just has no consistency on offense

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 51
Posted: #15
Rams and Tampa are worse... but not by much.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1549
Posted: #16
washington over under 4 wins?????
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 18306
Posted: #17
Worst listed first
  1. Rams
  2. Raiders
  3. Lions
  4. Chiefs
  5. Browns
  6. Buccaneers
  7. Titans
  8. Redskin
The first and greatest victory is to conquer self
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1549
Posted: #18
titans way ahead of skins
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 44
Posted: #19
The Browns are the worst by far
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1549
Posted: #20
not sure that i have ever seen a year where the teams are so seperated from being decent and terrribllee i mean gambling devil just listed 9 teams that are by no means competitive
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 27318
Posted: #21
Yes these are definitely crazy times.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 18306
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by pickenwinners:

titans way ahead of skins


Not this year,
If they are playing head to head I still pick the skins. Titans is a money burner machine


The first and greatest victory is to conquer self
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2005
Posts: 4705
Posted: #23
Question: If Jags lose this week to Titans (who are favored by 3) do they join this illustrious group?  Bills managed to escape this bunch with back-to-back road wins, although Jets and Panthers did everything they could to hand them those games.
All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.