Hey guys, thought we'd take a look at some preseason predictions.
Number 1 surprise team ........................Packers
Improved by 5 games in 2009, tie for the 2cd largest improvement of any team.
Finished with the best spread record in the league, 11-4-1.
Easily went over their wins total for the season.
A bit dissappointed we didn't get a division title, but all in all not bad.
Other Surprise Teams.................... Saints
Well, we caught a flyer here guys, improved by 5 games in 2009, tie for 2cd best.
Easily went over their wins total for the season
Division title
NFC Championship
Super Bowl win possible
All in all, we did damn good here guys.................
Jags.......... Well, 2 out of 3 isn't bad. Jags had their chances to get in postseason late but crashed and burned.
Improved by 2 games in 2009, but stunk up the place with a 5-11 spread record 31st in the league.
Jags were a big dissappointment in 2009, not so good.
All things considered guys we had a very good season with our surprise teams in 2009.
Looking at our list of 5 undervalued teams above........... 3 of the 5 teams improved by 5 games in 2009 tie for 2cd best improvement in the league.
A 4th team improved by 2 games and just 1 of the 5 teams failed to show improvement, the Raiders who remained the same.
Not bad, the undervalued teams proved to be undervalued.
Of the 3 overvalued teams, Tenn declined by 5 games, 2cd biggest decline in the league. Finished with a 6-10 spread record tie for 26th in the league.
The Bears declined by 2 games and finished with a 6-10 spread record, tie for 26th.
2 of the 3 overvalued teams proved this season to be overvalued.
Of the 8 overvalued or undervalued teams posted above, only 1, Indy, would actually go opposite what "the stat battles" said they would.
Showing an improvement of 2 games and it likely could have been better had they wanted to.
Finished a spread record of 10-5-1, 3rd best.
Fading Indy this season would of been a big mistake.
I'll try and get the list of teams for next season up before the SB.
The critera for a surprise team is..... the team must not have made the playoffs the year before and ussually will include 1 or sometimes 2 teams that finished with 6 wins or fewer the year before.
We have a pretty good record of picking teams with 6 wins or fewer as surprise teams and getting them into the postseason the following year. This season we went 1-1, with the Pack getting in and the Jags who were knocking on the door late but failing to get in.
The method used to pick the Saints who don't finish on the undervalued list above was, the Saints won the most "stat battles" of any team that didn't make the playoffs in 2008 and the team that does automatically becomes a surprise team next year.
The team this season which won the most "stat battles" , and by the way, they won more stat battles than many of the teams which made the playoff and may be very close to setting the record for most "stat battle" wins of any team not to make the postseason, when a team performs like this it's a strong possibility they'll have a big, big year next season, and that team is.............................. The Houston Texans !!!
Hey guys, thought we'd take a look at some preseason predictions.
Number 1 surprise team ........................Packers
Improved by 5 games in 2009, tie for the 2cd largest improvement of any team.
Finished with the best spread record in the league, 11-4-1.
Easily went over their wins total for the season.
A bit dissappointed we didn't get a division title, but all in all not bad.
Other Surprise Teams.................... Saints
Well, we caught a flyer here guys, improved by 5 games in 2009, tie for 2cd best.
Easily went over their wins total for the season
Division title
NFC Championship
Super Bowl win possible
All in all, we did damn good here guys.................
Jags.......... Well, 2 out of 3 isn't bad. Jags had their chances to get in postseason late but crashed and burned.
Improved by 2 games in 2009, but stunk up the place with a 5-11 spread record 31st in the league.
Jags were a big dissappointment in 2009, not so good.
All things considered guys we had a very good season with our surprise teams in 2009.
Looking at our list of 5 undervalued teams above........... 3 of the 5 teams improved by 5 games in 2009 tie for 2cd best improvement in the league.
A 4th team improved by 2 games and just 1 of the 5 teams failed to show improvement, the Raiders who remained the same.
Not bad, the undervalued teams proved to be undervalued.
Of the 3 overvalued teams, Tenn declined by 5 games, 2cd biggest decline in the league. Finished with a 6-10 spread record tie for 26th in the league.
The Bears declined by 2 games and finished with a 6-10 spread record, tie for 26th.
2 of the 3 overvalued teams proved this season to be overvalued.
Of the 8 overvalued or undervalued teams posted above, only 1, Indy, would actually go opposite what "the stat battles" said they would.
Showing an improvement of 2 games and it likely could have been better had they wanted to.
Finished a spread record of 10-5-1, 3rd best.
Fading Indy this season would of been a big mistake.
I'll try and get the list of teams for next season up before the SB.
The critera for a surprise team is..... the team must not have made the playoffs the year before and ussually will include 1 or sometimes 2 teams that finished with 6 wins or fewer the year before.
We have a pretty good record of picking teams with 6 wins or fewer as surprise teams and getting them into the postseason the following year. This season we went 1-1, with the Pack getting in and the Jags who were knocking on the door late but failing to get in.
The method used to pick the Saints who don't finish on the undervalued list above was, the Saints won the most "stat battles" of any team that didn't make the playoffs in 2008 and the team that does automatically becomes a surprise team next year.
The team this season which won the most "stat battles" , and by the way, they won more stat battles than many of the teams which made the playoff and may be very close to setting the record for most "stat battle" wins of any team not to make the postseason, when a team performs like this it's a strong possibility they'll have a big, big year next season, and that team is.............................. The Houston Texans !!!
With the draft just around the corner thought I'd post my surprise teams next season using the "key stat battles" as explained in the 1st post above as my guide.
The undervalued teams.........................
1. Houston, won 9 games, should of won 11.4 games, off by 2.4 games
2. Redskins, won 4 games, should of won 6.1 games, off by 2.1 games
3. Steelers, won 9 games, should of won 10.7 games, off b y 1.7 games
4. Bucs, won 3 games, should of won 4.4 games, off by 1.4 games
Teams finishing 2 wins less than they should have many times makes big improvements the next season.
This points to Houston and Washington, my 2 surprise teams for 2010, and this before the Mcnabb trade, looks even better now.
The overvalued teams ........................................
1. Atlanta, won 9 games, should of won 6.4 games, off by 2.6 games
2. 49ers, won 8 games, should of won 5.5 games, off by 2.5 games
3. Raiders, won 5 games, should of won 2.7 games, off by 2.3 games
4. Browns, won 5 games, should of won 2.9 games, off by 2.1 games
5. Colts, won 14 games, should of won 12 games, off by 2 games
Interesting the Colts were overvalued in 2008 and now in 2009. The only team to make either list both years.
The Colts were the only team of the 8 teams posted above to beat the "key stat battles" in 2009, but can they do it again in 2010 ??
Not likely................. should be interesting, we'll see.............................
With the draft just around the corner thought I'd post my surprise teams next season using the "key stat battles" as explained in the 1st post above as my guide.
The undervalued teams.........................
1. Houston, won 9 games, should of won 11.4 games, off by 2.4 games
2. Redskins, won 4 games, should of won 6.1 games, off by 2.1 games
3. Steelers, won 9 games, should of won 10.7 games, off b y 1.7 games
4. Bucs, won 3 games, should of won 4.4 games, off by 1.4 games
Teams finishing 2 wins less than they should have many times makes big improvements the next season.
This points to Houston and Washington, my 2 surprise teams for 2010, and this before the Mcnabb trade, looks even better now.
The overvalued teams ........................................
1. Atlanta, won 9 games, should of won 6.4 games, off by 2.6 games
2. 49ers, won 8 games, should of won 5.5 games, off by 2.5 games
3. Raiders, won 5 games, should of won 2.7 games, off by 2.3 games
4. Browns, won 5 games, should of won 2.9 games, off by 2.1 games
5. Colts, won 14 games, should of won 12 games, off by 2 games
Interesting the Colts were overvalued in 2008 and now in 2009. The only team to make either list both years.
The Colts were the only team of the 8 teams posted above to beat the "key stat battles" in 2009, but can they do it again in 2010 ??
Not likely................. should be interesting, we'll see.............................
Nice call Brother on the SB Champions ![]()
and calling those 3 teams back to earth![]()
Nice call Brother on the SB Champions ![]()
and calling those 3 teams back to earth![]()

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.