2008: 87-114-2 ( through 14 weeks )
2007: 126-121
2006: 122-126
2005: 123-123
2004: 114-132
2003: 115-117
2002: 122-125
2001: 119-112
2000: 110-128
1999: 118-114
Source: Las Vegas Sports Consultants
In week 12 Home teams went 4 - 11 - 1 ATS adding to that total
In week 13 Home teams went 5 - 10 - 1 ATS adding to that total
If all these numbers are accurate Home teams have gone 9 - 21 - 2 ATS the last 2 weeks of this season & 75 - 110 - 2 ATS ( 40.5 % ! ) for the year
This was posted on week 13's thread....
How did Home teams do on week 14 .
Quite well. Only 4 home teams failed to cover the spread on week 14 . Green Bay , Buffalo, NY Giants , and Denver . All of the other home teams covered their spreads ,
So, for week 14 Home teams went 12-4 ATS
The Updated YTD numbers would be : 87 - 114 - 2 ATS ( 43.3 % )
***********************************************
2008: 87-114-2 ( through 14 weeks )
2007: 126-121
2006: 122-126
2005: 123-123
2004: 114-132
2003: 115-117
2002: 122-125
2001: 119-112
2000: 110-128
1999: 118-114
Source: Las Vegas Sports Consultants
In week 12 Home teams went 4 - 11 - 1 ATS adding to that total
In week 13 Home teams went 5 - 10 - 1 ATS adding to that total
If all these numbers are accurate Home teams have gone 9 - 21 - 2 ATS the last 2 weeks of this season & 75 - 110 - 2 ATS ( 40.5 % ! ) for the year
This was posted on week 13's thread....
How did Home teams do on week 14 .
Quite well. Only 4 home teams failed to cover the spread on week 14 . Green Bay , Buffalo, NY Giants , and Denver . All of the other home teams covered their spreads ,
So, for week 14 Home teams went 12-4 ATS
The Updated YTD numbers would be : 87 - 114 - 2 ATS ( 43.3 % )
***********************************************
|
|
Points |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not that this constitutes a great deal of meaningful data, but based on this table there are three combinations that have been some distance from the 50% expected value. A few teams might be worth a closer look here in 2008:
|
|
Points |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not that this constitutes a great deal of meaningful data, but based on this table there are three combinations that have been some distance from the 50% expected value. A few teams might be worth a closer look here in 2008:
In week 12 Home teams went 4 - 11 - 1 ATS adding to that total
In week 13 Home teams went 5 - 10 - 1 ATS adding to that total
in week 14 Home teams went 12-4 ATS
How did Home teams do on week 15..
in week 15 home teams went 7 - 8 - 1 ATS
The Updated YTD numbers would be : 94- 122 - 3 ATS ( 43.5 % )
***********************************************
In week 12 Home teams went 4 - 11 - 1 ATS adding to that total
In week 13 Home teams went 5 - 10 - 1 ATS adding to that total
in week 14 Home teams went 12-4 ATS
How did Home teams do on week 15..
in week 15 home teams went 7 - 8 - 1 ATS
The Updated YTD numbers would be : 94- 122 - 3 ATS ( 43.5 % )
***********************************************

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.