All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

***SUPER BOWL XLVI--PATRIOTS VS GIANTS***

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 31506
Posts: 187
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 1367
Posted: #126
[Quote: Originally Posted by theclaw]

 

They have covered but not always won SU.

2003-04 Pats went 1-1 ATS VS panthers 3-0 ATS, Pats won SU.

1999-00 Rams went 1-1 ATS VS Titans 3-0 ATS, Rams won SU. And Rams pushed on closing spread.


EXACTLY MY POINT,THEY COV SPREAD!!....SOMETIMES THE UNDERDOG WON OUTRIGHT ALSO.....pay attention to what i wrote please

panthers 3-0 ats = sb cover!!

titans 3-0 ats = sb cover!!...(if u dont buy a hook or point on key # like 3 or (7 here) than you are a complete betting idiot,sorry!)
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 3164
Posted: #127
Quote Originally Posted by dgnerate:


how about this PTB if you think this is a trend:
the record for a team with a defense that belonged in the bottom 5 in the regular season is 0-45 in the superbowl.bol.
`


Every Super Bowl one of the teams had a defense in the bottom 5 in the regular season?  Please explain, doesn't sound possible.  No offense meant
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 12077
Posted: #128
Quote Originally Posted by dawizard2011:

Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:

 

They have covered but not always won SU.

2003-04 Pats went 1-1 ATS VS panthers 3-0 ATS, Pats won SU.

1999-00 Rams went 1-1 ATS VS Titans 3-0 ATS, Rams won SU. And Rams pushed on closing spread.


EXACTLY MY POINT,THEY COV SPREAD!!....SOMETIMES THE UNDERDOG WON OUTRIGHT ALSO.....pay attention to what i wrote please

panthers 3-0 ats = sb cover!!

titans 3-0 ats = sb cover!!...(if u dont buy a hook or point on key # like 3 or (7 here) than you are a complete betting idiot,sorry!)

 

I did pay attention, you wrote team with better ATS record WON/COVERED 9 OF 11 TIMES, covered yes , won no.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 298
Posted: #129
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:

Since 1997 wild card teams in the SB are.........................9-0 ATS and 6-3 SU with 2 of those 3 losses by 3 pts and the other Titans stopped at the 1 foot line from tying the game.

 

I would not bet against the Gmen..........................................

 

Im not questioning the stat because I havent done any research on it, but you are saying that out of the last 15 years, 9 superbowls have had a wildcard team in them? I sure wouldnt have thought that

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 1367
Posted: #130
[Quote: Originally Posted by dawizard2011] 09-10 = N.O. (WO)WON S.B.OUTRIGHT AFTER NO COVER VS VIKES....COLTS COV THROUGHOUT PLAYOFFS

95-96 = PITT. COV S.B. AFTER NO COVER VS INDY....DALLAS COV THROUGHOUT PLAYOFFS


**SINCE 1990-91 SEASON THE TEAM THAT HAS **COVERED THROUGHOUT THE PLAYOFFS** HAS WON/COV/WO THE SUPER BOWL (9 of the 11 times)...the 2 years listed above were the only times it failed!!**


with this being said....the NYG fit in this year cov/wo all games in playoffs!!!...the pats no cover vs balt last week


PLAY ON  NYG +3

actually u not paying attention like i said...i made it bigger for you above to read again!!....its not the team with better ats record,its the team with PERFECT ats record vs those with at least 1 no cover/push.....this stat does not include teams who may have covered twice while other team only covered once!!....its only teams that had PERFECT ats record as clearly stated originally!!!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 1367
Posted: #131
[Quote: Originally Posted by theclaw]

 

I did pay attention, you wrote team with better ATS record WON/COVERED 9 OF 11 TIMES, covered yes , won no.


wow i guess i got to break down what exactly WON/COV/WO MEANS....WON=covered spread as dog......COV= covered spread as fav.....and WO=won outright as dog.......by the way / = or,...lmao.....im sorry for those who already knew the terminology
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 4731
Posted: #132
Quote Originally Posted by WizrduvOdz:

`


Every Super Bowl one of the teams had a defense in the bottom 5 in the regular season?  Please explain, doesn't sound possible.  No offense meant



No he just saying no team has ever won the superbowl that has been in the bottom 5 in defense.There hasnt been too many in the superbowl.Also This is the first time that 2 teams are playing each other that are NOT in the top 25 of defense for the season.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 1958
Posted: #133
For the conspiracy theorist: Pats v Rams in England next season, let's send the Champs overseas for a nice marketing $cheme!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 1367
Posted: #134
[Quote: Originally Posted by BostonStrangler] For the conspiracy theorist: Pats v Rams in England next season, let's send the Champs overseas for a nice marketing $cheme! 

ummmmmm actually no conspiracy here being that the rams go over every year  for next 3 cause their owner is also owner of arsenal so he has ties over there already....of course it wont hurt to send tom brady over also....win or lose!!nobody will care in england by next year anyway,lol
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 1958
Posted: #135
Quote Originally Posted by dawizard2011:

Quote Originally Posted by BostonStrangler:

For the conspiracy theorist: Pats v Rams in England next season, let's send the Champs overseas for a nice marketing $cheme! 

ummmmmm actually no conspiracy here being that the rams go over every year  for next 3 cause their owner is also owner of arsenal so he has ties over there already....of course it wont hurt to send tom brady over also....win or lose!!nobody will care in england by next year anyway,lol

Oh, St. Louis is in the Super Bowl now?
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 59207
Posted: #136

Quote Originally Posted by PrimeTimeBoys:

There has been 7 super bowls since 1990 with the total of 50 or higher & the Under has come in 5 of those 7 bowl games..................with the last 3 bowl games of 50 or higher coming in on the under.............something to think about..............

Where were these games played? indoors? What type teams were they? High scoring or Defensive teams?

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 1534
Posted: #137

The public was on the Packers in the previous super bowl and won.

The public can win on this Giants bet again.

The line makers make the most money from prop bets, like the coin toss and gatorade color bath.

I believe the Giants will win the ATS and ML. The Under looks good as well.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 4731
Posted: #138
The o/u looks pretty split right now and thats why 55 was the right number.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 24
Posted: #139
hope so  i am probable taking the patriots if i do bet
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:

Nah. Revenge is sweet. Manning has no business being in this game. Belichek takes Cruz away.....NE by 14+



 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 127
Posted: #140
UNDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 620
Posted: #141
Quote Originally Posted by PrimeTimeBoys:



Giants own the Patriots..........5-1 ATS past 6 times.......Eli will own Brady once more..............

This one isnt about trends PTB , this one is common sense... This is for the Legacy of the Superior Champ MR.Brady... U can crunch all the numbers u want .. Just stop wasting your time trying to fool yourself, u have been doing this for too long.. U know this is all about Brady.. Please dont mislead yourself or others.. Do the right thing PTB...

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 5604
Posted: #142
I myself love the under.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 107
Posted: #143
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:

I take that back, the 3 losses, Panthers 3 pt loss to Pats, Zona 4 pt loss to Steelers, both teams lost on last minute drives, Titans 7 pt loss to Rams after being stopped at the 1 foot line.

 

In todays era of pass happy teams the better teams simply can not dominate in the playoffs like era's before.  GOOD POINT.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 5702
Posted: #144
Quote Originally Posted by PrimeTimeBoys:



No, it doesnt worry me the public is pounding the Giants at all...........Public was pound the G-men past 3 playoff games & they got the money.................no difference here............pro bettors jumped on the Giants at +3.5 & ML  & are still drilling the line..............gonna be interesting to see if the line drops to 2.............

 

I thought I was reading this right...this is the game that will change the course imo. Public been pounding the Giants but I think others are joining in too, too many of others.....this is the game that will allow the books to say this is why we do what we do. IMO...it's the game for them to get all that Giants moneyback after they beat the Packers and than alot more. That 100-1 is a huge #, regardless of how you look at it.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 1222
Posted: #145
how low do you think the betting  line will go?......Pats -1 1/2  or as low as even?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 13343
Posted: #146
Quote Originally Posted by donk:

how low do you think the betting  line will go?......Pats -1 1/2  or as low as even?


Imo, it will go back up to -3...............thats where the line should close........
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 3600
Posted: #147
In 5 super bowl rematches, the team that won the first meeting won the subsequent game 4 times. 

With that said, i'm still leaning towards Brady tying Montana's 4 super bowls....
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 5702
Posted: #148
Quote Originally Posted by PrimeTimeBoys:



Imo, it will go back up to -3...............thats where the line should close........

 

I agree with you...you've been pretty spot on.

Giants ML is 2.1 and Pats ML is 1.7....that's a nice payday for the books don't you think? If ppl buy the .5 off of 3...than it's a bigger payday for the books. If this line stays at a solid 3 and closed at 3....than the books really like the Pats, they are not hedging it any lower. It sounds like that 100-1 will stay at 100-1 is what I gathered.

So I don't think the books care if this game push at 3...they may have the eyes on something bigger.....o/u maybe? Teasers and parlays are tied up into the total.....but that total and you'll bust alot of nuts.

I could be wrong...but that's why we throw shit out there, to get FB.

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 4314
Posted: #149
Guys the Giants pass rush will not stop the Pats offense. Belichick & Brady will be prepared to counter the pass rush. They will move the chains.

The giants will also move the chains.

This game will be determined by Red Zone Scoring. Whichever team converts red zone trips to td's more than the other will win this game.

Good luck trying to cap that. I am leaning towards the better coaching, QB, and tight ends in that situation.

But the big question here is the health of Gronkowski's ankle. I am not making any  moves until I find out more. I saw that injury to the ankle and it looked really nasty. He's walking in a boot right now and not practicing. High ankle sprains are no joke as we learned from Big Ben and Gronk will be doing a lot more running.
 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 7850
Posted: #150
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:

Nah. Revenge is sweet. Manning has no business being in this game. Belichek takes Cruz away.....NE by 14+




train much respect bro but I have to say when I read this I was like, who is this impostor and what has he done with Train..

Manning has no business to be in this game has to be the most absurd thing I have and ever will hear you say.

 I hope you were just really drunk when you posted this.

All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.