that does it for tonight, nice grabs early, will let the others settle in for a while and start looking into matchups
- Arkansas - 6.5
- Stanford - 6.5 hook
- Oregon St. + 10 hook
- Nebraska - 10
![]()
Best of luck to you this week 6 Wahoo ![]()
that does it for tonight, nice grabs early, will let the others settle in for a while and start looking into matchups
![]()
Best of luck to you this week 6 Wahoo ![]()
that does it for tonight, nice grabs early, will let the others settle in for a while and start looking into matchups
![]()
Best of luck to you this week 6 Wahoo ![]()
10 plays so far? Thats awesome, good luck![]()
10 plays so far? Thats awesome, good luck![]()
I like all of my plays except Nebraska, just knew that line would soar, the GOY line was 15 before the season and they opened it at 10 last night, already up to 12, probably just gonna wait for a middle![]()
On the Wildcats with +15 in the Preseason
.....
I was thinking the same thing on the Middle
....
Was hoping for something under DD's
.... But that ship never came in
...
I like all of my plays except Nebraska, just knew that line would soar, the GOY line was 15 before the season and they opened it at 10 last night, already up to 12, probably just gonna wait for a middle![]()
On the Wildcats with +15 in the Preseason
.....
I was thinking the same thing on the Middle
....
Was hoping for something under DD's
.... But that ship never came in
...
card is nearly done, will add a few more and possibly get rid of two of these, narrowing things down, would like 9-13 plays in total this week, we will see how it plays out
looking at LaffyTaffy, Mizzou, SDSU, Houston, Kentucky, Boise, Michigan, Fighting Zooks, Spurriers Kids, Washington and who knows what else will pop up, many possible games still looming
card is nearly done, will add a few more and possibly get rid of two of these, narrowing things down, would like 9-13 plays in total this week, we will see how it plays out
looking at LaffyTaffy, Mizzou, SDSU, Houston, Kentucky, Boise, Michigan, Fighting Zooks, Spurriers Kids, Washington and who knows what else will pop up, many possible games still looming
that being said, Boston College has one of the worst offenses out of all of the schools from major conferences, it is frightening how bad they look trying to move the football
I agree with you on Stanford and Arkansas![]()
that being said, Boston College has one of the worst offenses out of all of the schools from major conferences, it is frightening how bad they look trying to move the football
I agree with you on Stanford and Arkansas![]()
Wahoo,
What's your betting angle with Michigan? Because even though you know I'm a bit biased, I see no reason to lay 4.5 with them. I'm certainly not saying MSU is that good, but Michigan has sooooo many weaknesses, and some of them are glaring weaknesses!
Wahoo,
What's your betting angle with Michigan? Because even though you know I'm a bit biased, I see no reason to lay 4.5 with them. I'm certainly not saying MSU is that good, but Michigan has sooooo many weaknesses, and some of them are glaring weaknesses!
Has there ever been a Wahoos pick as chalky as -27?
Can't recall one. I never seem to get Vegas right, but it does have a certain 42-3 feel to it. ![]()
I was surprised that UNC wasn't catching 2.5 or so, and the line has done nothing but move their way since. Like Mr. GAM, I must be missing something here. Heels don't do much for me.
I played Tulane on the ML last week (Gar initially made fun of me, and then joined me on the play
), and I also like Army this week. These two have put up some interesting results in years past, including the Cadets covering by about 55 on the Wave's Homecoming a few years ago. Got to give Bob Toledo a lot of credit for getting this high school team of his to compete every week. Will be interesting to watch for attrition as the year goes on, as Tulane has absolutely no depth.
I don't know what to make of the Hoos in this week's inaugural Al Groh Bowl. Is there any way to fade both teams?
Has there ever been a Wahoos pick as chalky as -27?
Can't recall one. I never seem to get Vegas right, but it does have a certain 42-3 feel to it. ![]()
I was surprised that UNC wasn't catching 2.5 or so, and the line has done nothing but move their way since. Like Mr. GAM, I must be missing something here. Heels don't do much for me.
I played Tulane on the ML last week (Gar initially made fun of me, and then joined me on the play
), and I also like Army this week. These two have put up some interesting results in years past, including the Cadets covering by about 55 on the Wave's Homecoming a few years ago. Got to give Bob Toledo a lot of credit for getting this high school team of his to compete every week. Will be interesting to watch for attrition as the year goes on, as Tulane has absolutely no depth.
I don't know what to make of the Hoos in this week's inaugural Al Groh Bowl. Is there any way to fade both teams?
Cincy look good against OU and is showing some signs of improvement, Pead is good and at home with ample prep time they should be able to take care of business vs the lonely Redhawks
Cincy look good against OU and is showing some signs of improvement, Pead is good and at home with ample prep time they should be able to take care of business vs the lonely Redhawks
Has there ever been a Wahoos pick as chalky as -27?
Can't recall one. I never seem to get Vegas right, but it does have a certain 42-3 feel to it. ![]()
I was surprised that UNC wasn't catching 2.5 or so, and the line has done nothing but move their way since. Like Mr. GAM, I must be missing something here. Heels don't do much for me.
I played Tulane on the ML last week (Gar initially made fun of me, and then joined me on the play
), and I also like Army this week. These two have put up some interesting results in years past, including the Cadets covering by about 55 on the Wave's Homecoming a few years ago. Got to give Bob Toledo a lot of credit for getting this high school team of his to compete every week. Will be interesting to watch for attrition as the year goes on, as Tulane has absolutely no depth.
I don't know what to make of the Hoos in this week's inaugural Al Groh Bowl. Is there any way to fade both teams?
Clemson/UNC is a bad matchup for the Tigers in my opinion, it will be a game in the 20's (scoring wise) and I think the Heels can get it done, Clemson just finds ways to lose games and they may have the worst group of WR's known to man
Yates has also been solid this year and has shown alot of improvement, I like the Heels in this spot
best of luck with your Stanford game, I'm with you and I hope we can bring it home![]()
Has there ever been a Wahoos pick as chalky as -27?
Can't recall one. I never seem to get Vegas right, but it does have a certain 42-3 feel to it. ![]()
I was surprised that UNC wasn't catching 2.5 or so, and the line has done nothing but move their way since. Like Mr. GAM, I must be missing something here. Heels don't do much for me.
I played Tulane on the ML last week (Gar initially made fun of me, and then joined me on the play
), and I also like Army this week. These two have put up some interesting results in years past, including the Cadets covering by about 55 on the Wave's Homecoming a few years ago. Got to give Bob Toledo a lot of credit for getting this high school team of his to compete every week. Will be interesting to watch for attrition as the year goes on, as Tulane has absolutely no depth.
I don't know what to make of the Hoos in this week's inaugural Al Groh Bowl. Is there any way to fade both teams?
Clemson/UNC is a bad matchup for the Tigers in my opinion, it will be a game in the 20's (scoring wise) and I think the Heels can get it done, Clemson just finds ways to lose games and they may have the worst group of WR's known to man
Yates has also been solid this year and has shown alot of improvement, I like the Heels in this spot
best of luck with your Stanford game, I'm with you and I hope we can bring it home![]()
not to mention the huge coaching mismatch in this one, Sherman is somewhat of a disaster for the Ags![]()
not to mention the huge coaching mismatch in this one, Sherman is somewhat of a disaster for the Ags![]()
Wahoo,
What's your betting angle with Michigan? Because even though you know I'm a bit biased, I see no reason to lay 4.5 with them. I'm certainly not saying MSU is that good, but Michigan has sooooo many weaknesses, and some of them are glaring weaknesses!
Wahoo,
What's your betting angle with Michigan? Because even though you know I'm a bit biased, I see no reason to lay 4.5 with them. I'm certainly not saying MSU is that good, but Michigan has sooooo many weaknesses, and some of them are glaring weaknesses!
Laying 4 TDs with Bill Stewart is almost certain to end up in ![]()
I do like Cal a lot though...think people are going to be suckered in by the pistol angle.
BOL Wahoo
Laying 4 TDs with Bill Stewart is almost certain to end up in ![]()
I do like Cal a lot though...think people are going to be suckered in by the pistol angle.
BOL Wahoo
been mixing in some totals lately, a new Hoo? ![]()
been mixing in some totals lately, a new Hoo? ![]()
Laying 4 TDs with Bill Stewart is almost certain to end up in ![]()
I do like Cal a lot though...think people are going to be suckered in by the pistol angle.
BOL Wahoo
my card will probably adjust tonight & tom, I'm still going over things
I'll worry about my over tonight and then worry about the rest of the card, until then
![]()
Laying 4 TDs with Bill Stewart is almost certain to end up in ![]()
I do like Cal a lot though...think people are going to be suckered in by the pistol angle.
BOL Wahoo
my card will probably adjust tonight & tom, I'm still going over things
I'll worry about my over tonight and then worry about the rest of the card, until then
![]()

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.