Camp, McShady just put in the GM2 play for Wash under. It is now Wash TT under 4.5.
I like the Twins as a jump-in. I'm considering Ariz as they just got swept last week.
I also like the under 8.5 with the Yankees Sabathia vs Happ.
Thanks for the feedback, Angle. With the Diamondbacks being an early start, I'll probably play them, still with time to decide on Twins later. If the Dbacks win, I'll most likely pass on the Twins. If the Dbacks lose, I'll give the Twins a shot.
I'll update the card to reflect McShady's additional play.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Angle4U999:
Camp, McShady just put in the GM2 play for Wash under. It is now Wash TT under 4.5.
I like the Twins as a jump-in. I'm considering Ariz as they just got swept last week.
I also like the under 8.5 with the Yankees Sabathia vs Happ.
Thanks for the feedback, Angle. With the Diamondbacks being an early start, I'll probably play them, still with time to decide on Twins later. If the Dbacks win, I'll most likely pass on the Twins. If the Dbacks lose, I'll give the Twins a shot.
I'll update the card to reflect McShady's additional play.
Braves/Padres OVER 7 (***Be aware that McShady likes the UNDER)
Semper
Rays ML (Game 3) (confirmed)
A's/Indians Score in 1st Inning YES +100 (confirmed)
Thanks again to McShady/Semper/Angle/et all for their continued source of fantastic MLB insight and discussion. Let's have a profitable Wednesday, Chasers!
0
McShady/Semper Chase Plays for Wednesday 8/30
McShady
A's -1 (***Game 3 SWITCH) (confirmed)
Nationals Team Total UNDER 4.5 (confirmed)
Phillies Team Total UNDER 4 (confirmed)
McTrendz In-Play for Wednesday
Braves/Padres OVER 7 (***Be aware that McShady likes the UNDER)
Semper
Rays ML (Game 3) (confirmed)
A's/Indians Score in 1st Inning YES +100 (confirmed)
Thanks again to McShady/Semper/Angle/et all for their continued source of fantastic MLB insight and discussion. Let's have a profitable Wednesday, Chasers!
Braves/Padres OVER 7 (***Be aware that McShady likes the UNDER)
Semper
Rays ML (Game 3) (confirmed)
A's/Indians Score in 1st Inning YES +100 (confirmed)
Appears to be FINAL card above. Angle...nice win on the Dodgers! I'll also be on the Twins tonight as the Diamondbacks lost earlier today. I'm also continuing my Red Sox chase in Anaheim.
Thanks again to McShady/Semper/Angle/et all for their continued source of fantastic MLB insight and discussion.
Let's have a profitable Wednesday night, Chasers!
0
Quote Originally Posted by campjenkins:
McShady/Semper Chase Plays for Wednesday 8/30
McShady
A's -1 (***Game 3 SWITCH) (confirmed)
Nationals Team Total UNDER 4.5 (confirmed)
Phillies Team Total UNDER 4 (confirmed)
McTrendz In-Play for Wednesday
Braves/Padres OVER 7 (***Be aware that McShady likes the UNDER)
Semper
Rays ML (Game 3) (confirmed)
A's/Indians Score in 1st Inning YES +100 (confirmed)
Appears to be FINAL card above. Angle...nice win on the Dodgers! I'll also be on the Twins tonight as the Diamondbacks lost earlier today. I'm also continuing my Red Sox chase in Anaheim.
Thanks again to McShady/Semper/Angle/et all for their continued source of fantastic MLB insight and discussion.
rayz!!! now that's a win. i wasnt as disciplined as you, @ semeper, so i jumped on the twins last night, chased em today, go get it. i also mcshadied mcshady's -1 rl on oak and continued to chase the indians... fine - next time leave it alone! yanks 1st hits for a double up aft missing last night. angle, white sox - great call brother.
gentlemen, thank you. fn and fn
get em.
0
rayz!!! now that's a win. i wasnt as disciplined as you, @ semeper, so i jumped on the twins last night, chased em today, go get it. i also mcshadied mcshady's -1 rl on oak and continued to chase the indians... fine - next time leave it alone! yanks 1st hits for a double up aft missing last night. angle, white sox - great call brother.
Semper, great win on Rays! From Dallas Morning News after the 1-0 loss, Joe Maddon said and I quote almost exactly "We will be ready for the next game!" (They tore up Harrison last time they faced him.)
McShady, I usually don't have bets on team totals as not available on my main book but I did win with Oakland, thanks! (On a side note, the check is in the mail for your mention of my HUGE COX website! You were right, the hits went almost viral when you posted the link!!! The only thing that pissed me off was you claimed it was your unit instead of mine!!!) Plus, you forgot to promote the HUGEBALLZ website that I created in your honor!!!
Okay, since I posted losers 1-2 the other day, I finally got some winners today.
FADED Total of the day, Houston under!
Dodgers jump-in.
White Sox jump-in.
Minn jump-in.
Ariz jump-in. That's 2 series in a row!!! May want to double-up next time to avoid sweep at home.
Yankees under 8.5. I almost pulled the trigger on Toronto with Happ, but since I cashed with Semper's pick on Toronto GM1 I didn't want to double-dip, which is normally the way to go as Semper says.. Happ came from the Astros, and has improved since but as an Astros fan I could not do it, just glad for the GM1 win as a HUGE DOG!!! (Thanks again Semper!)
I know, I didn't actually say I was fading the Astros under, but info came in late after I signed off, sorry if anyone lost. Lately, that total has been fade material and McShady has taught me well!!!
Thanks to Semper, McShady and all others! I also hit with San Diego again! Thanks Moth! Thanks Camp for your support on the Twins chase!
Looking forward to Thurs as another chance to jump-in on something.
Let's keep it up guys, the year is almost over.
0
Semper, great win on Rays! From Dallas Morning News after the 1-0 loss, Joe Maddon said and I quote almost exactly "We will be ready for the next game!" (They tore up Harrison last time they faced him.)
McShady, I usually don't have bets on team totals as not available on my main book but I did win with Oakland, thanks! (On a side note, the check is in the mail for your mention of my HUGE COX website! You were right, the hits went almost viral when you posted the link!!! The only thing that pissed me off was you claimed it was your unit instead of mine!!!) Plus, you forgot to promote the HUGEBALLZ website that I created in your honor!!!
Okay, since I posted losers 1-2 the other day, I finally got some winners today.
FADED Total of the day, Houston under!
Dodgers jump-in.
White Sox jump-in.
Minn jump-in.
Ariz jump-in. That's 2 series in a row!!! May want to double-up next time to avoid sweep at home.
Yankees under 8.5. I almost pulled the trigger on Toronto with Happ, but since I cashed with Semper's pick on Toronto GM1 I didn't want to double-dip, which is normally the way to go as Semper says.. Happ came from the Astros, and has improved since but as an Astros fan I could not do it, just glad for the GM1 win as a HUGE DOG!!! (Thanks again Semper!)
I know, I didn't actually say I was fading the Astros under, but info came in late after I signed off, sorry if anyone lost. Lately, that total has been fade material and McShady has taught me well!!!
Thanks to Semper, McShady and all others! I also hit with San Diego again! Thanks Moth! Thanks Camp for your support on the Twins chase!
Looking forward to Thurs as another chance to jump-in on something.
Dammit, McShady, you scared me off the Padres over!
Oh, well, I'm still ahead taking your advice!!!
Let's get em tomorrow!
I read somewhere and cannot find it now, that conference home dogs in the first 2 weeks hit pretty well in NCAA football. I cannot find the email, so this is a guess based on memory. Please do not put major money on these plays!
The games involved are:
Thurs S Car at Vandy +6.5 (buy to 7.5)
Saturday Mia at Boston College +2 (buy to 3 or 3.5) Troy at UAB +6 (buy to 7 or 7.5)
I hope this makes sense, and anyone who got the email from 1unitwagers can chime in and let me know if I have this correct. For all I know, it could have been the favorite, but I don't think so, I always look for dogs now after following Semper and McShady. Of course, on jump-in MLB chases I am not afraid to take a favorite.
Another gem that I have researched. Fade the Super Bowl champ (Giants) for a 3 game chase. I read that it has never lost. Since they are almost always favored be sure to buy at least a half point over 3, 7, 10, 14,etc, but if you don't want to lose by half point buy 1 point if necessary.
0
Dammit, McShady, you scared me off the Padres over!
Oh, well, I'm still ahead taking your advice!!!
Let's get em tomorrow!
I read somewhere and cannot find it now, that conference home dogs in the first 2 weeks hit pretty well in NCAA football. I cannot find the email, so this is a guess based on memory. Please do not put major money on these plays!
The games involved are:
Thurs S Car at Vandy +6.5 (buy to 7.5)
Saturday Mia at Boston College +2 (buy to 3 or 3.5) Troy at UAB +6 (buy to 7 or 7.5)
I hope this makes sense, and anyone who got the email from 1unitwagers can chime in and let me know if I have this correct. For all I know, it could have been the favorite, but I don't think so, I always look for dogs now after following Semper and McShady. Of course, on jump-in MLB chases I am not afraid to take a favorite.
Another gem that I have researched. Fade the Super Bowl champ (Giants) for a 3 game chase. I read that it has never lost. Since they are almost always favored be sure to buy at least a half point over 3, 7, 10, 14,etc, but if you don't want to lose by half point buy 1 point if necessary.
The ACC and the Big East are generally regarded to be the two weakest of
the major conferences, but as you will see, the non-conference ATS
results of the two conferences are quite different over the last five
years. The ACC has a losing 126-139-5, 47.6 percent ATS record out of
conference since 2006, with favorites going 67-87-2 ATS for a 56.5
percent fade. This goes against the Week 1 favorite pattern and the one qualifying play for Week 1 is Florida International +3½ vs. Duke.
0
The ACC and the Big East are generally regarded to be the two weakest of
the major conferences, but as you will see, the non-conference ATS
results of the two conferences are quite different over the last five
years. The ACC has a losing 126-139-5, 47.6 percent ATS record out of
conference since 2006, with favorites going 67-87-2 ATS for a 56.5
percent fade. This goes against the Week 1 favorite pattern and the one qualifying play for Week 1 is Florida International +3½ vs. Duke.
Big 12 is 125-105-3, 54.4 percent ATS out of conference the last five
years, and in keeping with the normal Week 1 theme, Big 12
non-conference favorites have been especially strong going 103-78-3,
56.9 percent ATS. The four qualifying plays this weekend are
Oklahoma -31, Texas -29½ and West Virginia -24½ on Saturday and Baylor
-10½ on Sunday.
0
Big 12 is 125-105-3, 54.4 percent ATS out of conference the last five
years, and in keeping with the normal Week 1 theme, Big 12
non-conference favorites have been especially strong going 103-78-3,
56.9 percent ATS. The four qualifying plays this weekend are
Oklahoma -31, Texas -29½ and West Virginia -24½ on Saturday and Baylor
-10½ on Sunday.
The Big East may be the weakest conference of all among the six major
conferences and yet it is 132-96-3, 57.9 percent ATS in non-conference
games since 2006, although that is probably due to scheduling weak
opponents. The Big East has excelled both as a favorite (79-57-2, 58.1
percent ATS) and as an underdog (50-38-1, 56.8 percent ATS). There are
two qualifying favorites this week in Rutgers -20½ on Saturday and
Louisville -13½ on Sunday, as well as one qualifying underdog in Syracuse +2 vs. Northwestern on Saturday.
0
The Big East may be the weakest conference of all among the six major
conferences and yet it is 132-96-3, 57.9 percent ATS in non-conference
games since 2006, although that is probably due to scheduling weak
opponents. The Big East has excelled both as a favorite (79-57-2, 58.1
percent ATS) and as an underdog (50-38-1, 56.8 percent ATS). There are
two qualifying favorites this week in Rutgers -20½ on Saturday and
Louisville -13½ on Sunday, as well as one qualifying underdog in Syracuse +2 vs. Northwestern on Saturday.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.