What is the point of arguing about this? Different people have different strategies on how to bet and who is to say the others is wrong? There are ALWAYS going to be people who think the lines have nothing to do with who wins, and there are ALWAYS going to be people who think the lines factor into the winner.
Arguing over who is right and who is wrong is a never ending argument. No one wins.
0
What is the point of arguing about this? Different people have different strategies on how to bet and who is to say the others is wrong? There are ALWAYS going to be people who think the lines have nothing to do with who wins, and there are ALWAYS going to be people who think the lines factor into the winner.
Arguing over who is right and who is wrong is a never ending argument. No one wins.
Perhaps with baseball you can get away with ignoring the public and just picking the team you think is going to when the game. But when you start talking about other sports, like football for example, and start dealing with spreads, then understanding which side the public money is on, line movement and finding VALUE in the side you bet becomes critical, in my opinion.
0
Perhaps with baseball you can get away with ignoring the public and just picking the team you think is going to when the game. But when you start talking about other sports, like football for example, and start dealing with spreads, then understanding which side the public money is on, line movement and finding VALUE in the side you bet becomes critical, in my opinion.
both methods are valid in increasing profit... two each his own seriously.
Sometimes I'm with the public, sometimes against. It's good to know though, I wouldn't say its complete BS. And at the end of the day if you ask all the really profitable gamblers out here. they wouldn't say they didn't check value and public.
NOTE: public/value two diff things
0
both methods are valid in increasing profit... two each his own seriously.
Sometimes I'm with the public, sometimes against. It's good to know though, I wouldn't say its complete BS. And at the end of the day if you ask all the really profitable gamblers out here. they wouldn't say they didn't check value and public.
all the people who dont agree...guess what i could give 2 shits....u know what i do care about??? the thousands of dollars in my closet.
i stand by my comment 100% and dont give a shit if people like it or dont
and RJSIZZLE your still on my dick man, can u get off already....ive seen u in several threads bring my name up....i wasnt talking about that particular game i said u should NEVER BET A GAME BASED JUST ON THE LINE ALONE.
HI HATERS----
GOOD CALL ! I pick my games and dont look at anything that would bias my analysis if I have picked one that is aconsensus pick, I think, " Wow, the consensus has this one right! I have had people say I was playing favs and overs one day, and went like 8-2. This SQUARE /Sharp nonsense irritates me! The so called "square" plays I have bet on normally WIN? So, is it still a square play? NO hell no, its the winner? Since November 6th, I posted and they are all on my blog b/c I check it to go there, and I looked back this am, and I went 34-12-1, in that time period hitting Dalas for 2000, and 1000, and 200 there last game when Roy Williams got the ball stripped on Thanksgiving day! I just try and stay away from those guys that write threads that say , "as a matter of fact" , the play they posted will NOT lose, and one guy picked the Giants last week and about 40 guys were taking them b/c he said that, and LOST! They post these capricious picks and these guys are like sheep lead to slaughter, and they lose there money? I couldnt live with myself! Thats why they play the game!
Great discussion my friend! Im glad to see others feel the same as I do about these extremely audacious posts! BOL to all of you this weekend! PG
0
Quote Originally Posted by hammer22:
ACE AND ALL THE PEOPLE WHO AGREE
all the people who dont agree...guess what i could give 2 shits....u know what i do care about??? the thousands of dollars in my closet.
i stand by my comment 100% and dont give a shit if people like it or dont
and RJSIZZLE your still on my dick man, can u get off already....ive seen u in several threads bring my name up....i wasnt talking about that particular game i said u should NEVER BET A GAME BASED JUST ON THE LINE ALONE.
HI HATERS----
GOOD CALL ! I pick my games and dont look at anything that would bias my analysis if I have picked one that is aconsensus pick, I think, " Wow, the consensus has this one right! I have had people say I was playing favs and overs one day, and went like 8-2. This SQUARE /Sharp nonsense irritates me! The so called "square" plays I have bet on normally WIN? So, is it still a square play? NO hell no, its the winner? Since November 6th, I posted and they are all on my blog b/c I check it to go there, and I looked back this am, and I went 34-12-1, in that time period hitting Dalas for 2000, and 1000, and 200 there last game when Roy Williams got the ball stripped on Thanksgiving day! I just try and stay away from those guys that write threads that say , "as a matter of fact" , the play they posted will NOT lose, and one guy picked the Giants last week and about 40 guys were taking them b/c he said that, and LOST! They post these capricious picks and these guys are like sheep lead to slaughter, and they lose there money? I couldnt live with myself! Thats why they play the game!
Great discussion my friend! Im glad to see others feel the same as I do about these extremely audacious posts! BOL to all of you this weekend! PG
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
