I know two fade sharps who fade badlands after he has 4 straight winning nights and they make a killing, make all the faces you like but I deal with experts why you deal with cartoons.
0
Quote Originally Posted by poolman11:
badlands fade material a few drinks then a
I know two fade sharps who fade badlands after he has 4 straight winning nights and they make a killing, make all the faces you like but I deal with experts why you deal with cartoons.
I'll respond to all the "pathetic posts" I don't even call it hating as that's above you and it being beneath me I can distinguish it better than most. How about you boys get a good night sleep huh.
0
I'll respond to all the "pathetic posts" I don't even call it hating as that's above you and it being beneath me I can distinguish it better than most. How about you boys get a good night sleep huh.
2.5* Kent St -1.5 W 2.5* Bradley -2 W 1.10* Marquette -7 L 1.10* Memphis +2 W 1* Tulane -2.5 L 1* Missouri -8 W 1* Kansas -13 L .85* Umass -1 7pm W .85* George Mason +10 7pm L .85* Hawaii +3 10pm L .85* Appalachian State +16.5 8pm W .85* Tulane/Wofford Under 127 7pm W .85* Iowa/N. Iowa Under 133 8pm W
8-5 smarty pants.
Congrats on the Iowa Under. My book graded that as a loss.
GL
0
Quote Originally Posted by ultimatetailer1:
2.5* Kent St -1.5 W 2.5* Bradley -2 W 1.10* Marquette -7 L 1.10* Memphis +2 W 1* Tulane -2.5 L 1* Missouri -8 W 1* Kansas -13 L .85* Umass -1 7pm W .85* George Mason +10 7pm L .85* Hawaii +3 10pm L .85* Appalachian State +16.5 8pm W .85* Tulane/Wofford Under 127 7pm W .85* Iowa/N. Iowa Under 133 8pm W
8-5 smarty pants.
Congrats on the Iowa Under. My book graded that as a loss.
And he forgot to mention that he had the Tulane/Wofford over 125 which was a loss making him 7-7 on the day. However, I do acknowledge he did win almost 2.5 units on the day. So bad accounting, but nice day!
0
And he forgot to mention that he had the Tulane/Wofford over 125 which was a loss making him 7-7 on the day. However, I do acknowledge he did win almost 2.5 units on the day. So bad accounting, but nice day!
2.5* Kent St -1.5 W 2.5* Bradley -2 W 1.10* Marquette -7 L 1.10* Memphis +2 W 1* Tulane -2.5 L 1* Missouri -8 W 1* Kansas -13 L .85* Umass -1 7pm W .85* George Mason +10 7pm L .85* Hawaii +3 10pm L .85* Appalachian State +16.5 8pm W .85* Tulane/Wofford Under 127 7pm W (taied NROPP over someone else, conflict wasn't intentional) .85* Iowa/N. Iowa Under 133 8pm L
7-6 +4.7
0
2.5* Kent St -1.5 W 2.5* Bradley -2 W 1.10* Marquette -7 L 1.10* Memphis +2 W 1* Tulane -2.5 L 1* Missouri -8 W 1* Kansas -13 L .85* Umass -1 7pm W .85* George Mason +10 7pm L .85* Hawaii +3 10pm L .85* Appalachian State +16.5 8pm W .85* Tulane/Wofford Under 127 7pm W (taied NROPP over someone else, conflict wasn't intentional) .85* Iowa/N. Iowa Under 133 8pm L
And he forgot to mention that he had the Tulane/Wofford over 125 which was a loss making him 7-7 on the day. However, I do acknowledge he did win almost 2.5 units on the day. So bad accounting, but nice day!
won whats posted above, for some reason I thought Iowa went under, guess all this pollution is getting to me. Thanks for the handshake.
0
Quote Originally Posted by GameHunter:
And he forgot to mention that he had the Tulane/Wofford over 125 which was a loss making him 7-7 on the day. However, I do acknowledge he did win almost 2.5 units on the day. So bad accounting, but nice day!
won whats posted above, for some reason I thought Iowa went under, guess all this pollution is getting to me. Thanks for the handshake.
I'm going to bet both sides of a game tonight and tell my book the conflict wasn't intentional. I'm sure they'll cancel the losing bet for me.
The conflict wasn't in the copy and pasting of the posts not the actual submission of the wager as reflected in my 5dimes bankroll. Do me a favor upgrade your life by barring nit picking. ANYBODY WITH A HALF A BRAIN KNOWS I COPY AND PASTED OUT OF MY NOTEPAD WHICH HAD ALL OF NROPP PLAYS WITH THE STARTING TIMES. WHY IN HIGH HEAVEN WOULD I GO AGAINST HIM WHEN I"M ON ALL HIS OTHER PLAYS. VENOM LOVER.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Top_5_Guy:
I'm going to bet both sides of a game tonight and tell my book the conflict wasn't intentional. I'm sure they'll cancel the losing bet for me.
The conflict wasn't in the copy and pasting of the posts not the actual submission of the wager as reflected in my 5dimes bankroll. Do me a favor upgrade your life by barring nit picking. ANYBODY WITH A HALF A BRAIN KNOWS I COPY AND PASTED OUT OF MY NOTEPAD WHICH HAD ALL OF NROPP PLAYS WITH THE STARTING TIMES. WHY IN HIGH HEAVEN WOULD I GO AGAINST HIM WHEN I"M ON ALL HIS OTHER PLAYS. VENOM LOVER.
mean to to say conflict was in the copy and pasting and not editing it. I warned you all that I don't have a great amount of time, back at 5 or 6 pm, enjoy typing useless posts.
0
mean to to say conflict was in the copy and pasting and not editing it. I warned you all that I don't have a great amount of time, back at 5 or 6 pm, enjoy typing useless posts.
No, useless posts are copying a few other people's picks and starting your own thread to glorify yourself, especially for someone who doesn't have a great amount of time. But you are definitely impressing with your copy-and-pasting abilities.
0
No, useless posts are copying a few other people's picks and starting your own thread to glorify yourself, especially for someone who doesn't have a great amount of time. But you are definitely impressing with your copy-and-pasting abilities.
This Thead is genuinly amusing ... i'm interested to see how it goes. I read all the better handicappers threads here as well and you can get some useful information before making your own decisions so i'm interested to see how this works out.
0
This Thead is genuinly amusing ... i'm interested to see how it goes. I read all the better handicappers threads here as well and you can get some useful information before making your own decisions so i'm interested to see how this works out.
mean to to say conflict was in the copy and pasting and not editing it. I warned you all that I don't have a great amount of time, back at 5 or 6 pm, enjoy typing useless posts.
The fact is - this mistake WAS brought to your attention and yet you didn't correct the mistake until the game was over. I mean, you want to be taken seriously and you don't even know which games you are apparently betting on. While your big plays were nice - you still went 7-7 in your POSTED plays. Sorry if that confuses you - but I'm sure if that total had gone the other way - you would have counted it as a W and dismissed the L. Or if it had hit the middle, I'm sure you would be telling us how smart you are...
You don't have much time - and yet you get drawn into pissing contests with numerous posters...
0
Quote Originally Posted by ultimatetailer1:
mean to to say conflict was in the copy and pasting and not editing it. I warned you all that I don't have a great amount of time, back at 5 or 6 pm, enjoy typing useless posts.
The fact is - this mistake WAS brought to your attention and yet you didn't correct the mistake until the game was over. I mean, you want to be taken seriously and you don't even know which games you are apparently betting on. While your big plays were nice - you still went 7-7 in your POSTED plays. Sorry if that confuses you - but I'm sure if that total had gone the other way - you would have counted it as a W and dismissed the L. Or if it had hit the middle, I'm sure you would be telling us how smart you are...
You don't have much time - and yet you get drawn into pissing contests with numerous posters...
No, useless posts are copying a few other people's picks and starting your own thread to glorify yourself, especially for someone who doesn't have a great amount of time. But you are definitely impressing with your copy-and-pasting abilities.
I''ll be looking for you next to tool in the dictionary. Your baseless presumptions and illogical conclusions mean much more to you than anybody with sense. I'm not here to impress, glorify or toot any horns, I'm here to put monies back to the peoples that seemingly have forgotten that if you don't have the right stuff to bet on your own then you create a network of experts. This is what forums are all about, networking and using the tools available. We are only a product of our sources and as WILL in GOOD WILL HUNTING said to Robin Williams its all about having the right books i.e. right sources. Am I claiming to have the best experts around, no, but they're pretty darn good, and if anyone fancies helping this money making machine please post a handicapper that you think is worthy of inclusion. Using other peoples material has been done many, many times in history with huge success, now cut your pride and bias down a few notches and open your mind to what we all seek here. NOT DIRECTED TO YOU BUT ALL, IF YOUR A BOOK AGENT WHO SPEWS VENOM TO DESTROY WHATS PROFITABLE, I UNDERSTAND, YOUR UPBRINGING DESERVED BETTER.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Top_5_Guy:
No, useless posts are copying a few other people's picks and starting your own thread to glorify yourself, especially for someone who doesn't have a great amount of time. But you are definitely impressing with your copy-and-pasting abilities.
I''ll be looking for you next to tool in the dictionary. Your baseless presumptions and illogical conclusions mean much more to you than anybody with sense. I'm not here to impress, glorify or toot any horns, I'm here to put monies back to the peoples that seemingly have forgotten that if you don't have the right stuff to bet on your own then you create a network of experts. This is what forums are all about, networking and using the tools available. We are only a product of our sources and as WILL in GOOD WILL HUNTING said to Robin Williams its all about having the right books i.e. right sources. Am I claiming to have the best experts around, no, but they're pretty darn good, and if anyone fancies helping this money making machine please post a handicapper that you think is worthy of inclusion. Using other peoples material has been done many, many times in history with huge success, now cut your pride and bias down a few notches and open your mind to what we all seek here. NOT DIRECTED TO YOU BUT ALL, IF YOUR A BOOK AGENT WHO SPEWS VENOM TO DESTROY WHATS PROFITABLE, I UNDERSTAND, YOUR UPBRINGING DESERVED BETTER.
The fact is - this mistake WAS brought to your attention and yet you didn't correct the mistake until the game was over. I mean, you want to be taken seriously and you don't even know which games you are apparently betting on. While your big plays were nice - you still went 7-7 in your POSTED plays. Sorry if that confuses you - but I'm sure if that total had gone the other way - you would have counted it as a W and dismissed the L. Or if it had hit the middle, I'm sure you would be telling us how smart you are...
You don't have much time - and yet you get drawn into pissing contests with numerous posters...
I've made time when its available today, I have all my ducks in a row thank you very much. NROPP plays were all posted with times next to it, obviously if rationale took over for the majority they would define this as an obvious tail of all his plays. Last night I was with my wife snooping around for more playmates to add into our repertoire. Love the movie, usual suspects, at least we agree there.
0
Quote Originally Posted by _keyser_soze_:
The fact is - this mistake WAS brought to your attention and yet you didn't correct the mistake until the game was over. I mean, you want to be taken seriously and you don't even know which games you are apparently betting on. While your big plays were nice - you still went 7-7 in your POSTED plays. Sorry if that confuses you - but I'm sure if that total had gone the other way - you would have counted it as a W and dismissed the L. Or if it had hit the middle, I'm sure you would be telling us how smart you are...
You don't have much time - and yet you get drawn into pissing contests with numerous posters...
I've made time when its available today, I have all my ducks in a row thank you very much. NROPP plays were all posted with times next to it, obviously if rationale took over for the majority they would define this as an obvious tail of all his plays. Last night I was with my wife snooping around for more playmates to add into our repertoire. Love the movie, usual suspects, at least we agree there.
This Thead is genuinly amusing ... i'm interested to see how it goes. I read all the better handicappers threads here as well and you can get some useful information before making your own decisions so i'm interested to see how this works out.
trust me its only going to get better, amusing will be only one word to describe once the winning nights continue to be the norm and the naysayers, haters, book agents become so ridiculous in their banter that I'm gonna have to ask for posters such as yourself to deflect the diarrhea back into their court. So the stench can't infect a wholesome money maker and bring people such as yourself to front row of this beautiful paradise. Excited, at eased while dancing in the streets as the dollars rain on us, experience this those wiser to man, don't let the blind turn off your light.
0
Quote Originally Posted by shermhoy:
This Thead is genuinly amusing ... i'm interested to see how it goes. I read all the better handicappers threads here as well and you can get some useful information before making your own decisions so i'm interested to see how this works out.
trust me its only going to get better, amusing will be only one word to describe once the winning nights continue to be the norm and the naysayers, haters, book agents become so ridiculous in their banter that I'm gonna have to ask for posters such as yourself to deflect the diarrhea back into their court. So the stench can't infect a wholesome money maker and bring people such as yourself to front row of this beautiful paradise. Excited, at eased while dancing in the streets as the dollars rain on us, experience this those wiser to man, don't let the blind turn off your light.
You can't post two contradicting picks (both the over and the under of the same game) and then pick which one wins after the result is known...well actually you technically can, but you'll be ridiculed and tormented for doing so...rightfully. Grow up
0
You can't post two contradicting picks (both the over and the under of the same game) and then pick which one wins after the result is known...well actually you technically can, but you'll be ridiculed and tormented for doing so...rightfully. Grow up
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
a few drinks 
then a
!
Hot Forum Topics
