| Author: |
[Politics] Topic: The Media Lies, Romney Will Win |
|
drJ |
 View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Captain
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 6816
Location: Nevada |
#1 Posted: 9/10/2012 3:56:09 PM THE BULLSH*T: More of Politico's magical unnamed sources appear from within the Romney camp claiming Ohio is lost. THE FACTS: A poll released just last week had Romney up three in Ohio and the RCP poll of polls only has Obama up by 2.2 points. PPP -- left-leaning pollster affiliated with Obama toadies SEIU -- just released a poll showing Obama ahead 50/45 in Ohio. So you know it's pretty much tied. THE BULLSH*T: Obama's convention was a rousing success. THE FACTS: Obama's speech flopped and his delegates booed God and Israel. THE BULLSH*T: The campaign is over. Romney can't win. THE FACTS: There are 57 long days to go, four major debates, and the economy is collapsing. THE BULLSH*T: Obama is winning. THE FACTS: Romney was also winning after his convention. This is what happens after conventions. THE BULLSH*T: Conservatives are worried. THE FACTS: Only those who don’t know the facts. THE BULLSH*T: Obama can't lose. THE FACTS: Even after a three-day media lovefest, Obama's not polling over 50 in any national polls and most swing state polls. Conditions will never be this sweet for him again… And. He. Can't. Get. Over. 50. The media lies. That's what they do. It's not about truth; it's about winning Obama a second term. And in order to rescue him from the disastrous trifecta of a lame speech, booing God and an awful jobs report, the lying media launched this inevitability nonsense. |
|
quote |
|
darkhorse12 |
RSI  |
Captain
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 7417
Location: United States |
#2 Posted: 9/10/2012 4:03:01 PM |
|
quote |
|
TheGoldenGoose |
RSI  |
MVP
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 18221
Location: United States |
#3 Posted: 9/10/2012 4:07:57 PM
Small businessman, a restaurant owner, hugging Obama.
This picture is worth at least 5% gain in the State Polls.
Florida loves Obama
|
|
quote |
|
djbrow |
RSI  |
Covers Linesmen
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 11890
Location: United States |
#4 Posted: 9/10/2012 4:19:02 PM Well if Breitbart says it.....
next thing you know, The Heritage Foundation will call the election for Romney.  |
|
quote |
|
drJ |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Captain
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 6816
Location: Nevada |
#5 Posted: 9/10/2012 4:31:47 PM
Obama will bankrupt our country so while he will be the progressive you think you want, kiss our fiscal situation goodbye. |
|
quote |
|
|
|
depeche2 |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |
Legend
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 66823
Location: Illinois |
#6 Posted: 9/10/2012 4:46:51 PM
|
|
quote |
|
wallstreetcappers |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Covers Linesmen
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 47717
Location: United States |
#7 Posted: 9/10/2012 4:52:24 PM
Great thread.
|
|
quote |
|
djbrow |
RSI |
Covers Linesmen
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 11890
Location: United States |
#8 Posted: 9/10/2012 5:00:16 PM Not only that, he will do so intentionally. His ultimate goal is obviously the destruction and failure of America. Whether it is because he was born in Kenya or is Muslim, it doesn't really matter. Four more years of Obama and we will certainly become a third world country.  |
|
quote |
|
drJ |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Captain
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 6816
Location: Nevada |
#9 Posted: 9/10/2012 5:10:10 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: Wow..
Great thread.
Brilliant commentary yourself. Two months and you'll see I was right. take care.
Muslim....Kenyan.....did i ever say those things DJ? No, so take your straw man somewhere else. |
|
quote |
|
djbrow |
RSI |
Covers Linesmen
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 11890
Location: United States |
#10 Posted: 9/10/2012 5:15:26 PM In fact, you have stated many times that you believe Obama is intentionally destroying this country.
Do you really want to dispute saying that? |
|
quote |
|
drJ |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Captain
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 6816
Location: Nevada |
#11 Posted: 9/10/2012 5:18:04 PM |
|
quote |
|
djbrow |
RSI |
Covers Linesmen
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 11890
Location: United States |
#12 Posted: 9/10/2012 5:26:55 PM Did you ever think there is not an ulterior motive?
See, that is the problem with getting all of your political understandings from the Koch Brothers, Fox News, Breitbart, Heritage Foundation, Drudge Report, etc.
Budgets are nearly impossible to maintain. It is even harder for national politicans, as they are constricted by mandatory spending that existed long before they took office.
I could cite tons of graphs showing the percentage of governmental spending that is "Obama's responsibility" as opposed to spending that was mandated before his watch.
Our nation does have a spending problem, but it is far greater than Obama. It is the old axiom that everything is easier at a distance. Everyone is for cuts and less spendings, except when those cuts and less spending impacts them (which obviously creates a completely cyclical anamaly). |
|
quote |
|
drJ |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Captain
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 6816
Location: Nevada |
#13 Posted: 9/10/2012 6:12:23 PM I listen daily to BBC and NPR, no conservative talk radio and read the huffpo as well. no TV but sports and movies
Carter was way ahead in the polls as was Dukakis at this point....landslides. 2010 polls were way off at this point. The goal of the admin is to send out fishy data to whip their base up and bum out the other side. people hate obama. theyll show up and vote him out.
|
|
quote |
|
SirJohnDrake |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
All-Star
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 12218
Location: United States |
#14 Posted: 9/10/2012 6:20:00 PM Quote Posted by drj:
He will bankrupt us, 2016 the movie explains how.
---------------------------------------------------------------
I don't need to see the movie to convince me he is bankrupting the country because I can already see it with the policies he has which resulted in adding another 5 trillion dollars to the deficit.
But for those who are in denial...well maybe they should go see the movie!
If that wreckless spender gets another 4 yrs. with the same policies the deficit is projected to be at 20 trillion dollars by the time that big spender leaves office...ouch!
Let's get our fiscal house in order and vote for....
Romney and Ryan in 012!
|
|
quote |
|
SirJohnDrake |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
All-Star
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 12218
Location: United States |
#15 Posted: 9/10/2012 6:27:10 PM A while back obama called President Bush unpatriotic for increasing the deficit under his watch but President Bush only increased it by 3 trillion dollars in the 8 yrs. he was in office while obama has increased it by 5 trillion dollars in just a tad under 4 yrs.
Now tell me the truth obama who is really the unpatriotic guy?...lol
|
|
quote |
|
drJ |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Captain
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 6816
Location: Nevada |
#16 Posted: 9/10/2012 6:30:23 PM |
|
quote |
|
wallstreetcappers |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Covers Linesmen
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 47717
Location: United States |
#17 Posted: 9/10/2012 6:46:48 PM
Its like the guy above you who posts the same boring drivel all day long..it isnt interesting, it IS biased, annoying, useless junk.
Bring something strong, not just any bashing crap you can find..we have way too long until the election to settle on such low quality content. |
|
quote |
|
SirJohnDrake |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
All-Star
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 12218
Location: United States |
#18 Posted: 9/10/2012 6:54:39 PM Quote Posted by drj:
Bush increased it by more than that. he spent like a drunk democrat. obama moved twice as fast...doubled down on stupid.
-------------------------------------------------------------
No I believe what I said is accurate and the point was the obama has spent more in 4yrs. than President Bush ever did in 8 yrs.
But President Bush had to spend on the military after 9/11 to get after those criminials who attacked us on our soil.
But you know those criminals pretty much got what they wanted. They knew what they did would weaken us economically & financially.
They knew they couldn't beat us militarily but financially they could make an impact and that's what is happening know.
|
|
quote |
|
drJ |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Captain
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 6816
Location: Nevada |
#19 Posted: 9/10/2012 7:02:00 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: I dont mind interesting content and I am not in favor of either candidate..my problem is this thread is nothing but snoozing bashing.
Its like the guy above you who posts the same boring drivel all day long..it isnt interesting, it IS biased, annoying, useless junk.
Bring something strong, not just any bashing crap you can find..we have way too long until the election to settle on such low quality content.
Oh horse cookies. I'm telling you the polls are lying. The media, either side, always lies. 32 years ago , pew got 36% of callers....now 9% Polling companies sample way more democrats than the other.
If you think my contention that this book cooking and the media's portrayal of it is garbage then just disagree with it. I pasted a somewhat famous but biased conservative author.
you got about ten vocal lefties jizzing over the polls. i say they are wrong and ive been around long enough to see reagan 1 in 80 and the stupefied dems as well as bush 1. i also remember peter jennings losing his garbage in 94 and the dems having their minds blown in 2010 from their loss.
i am right, i know i'm right and 58 days from now i'll post it here. |
|
quote |
|
wallstreetcappers |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Covers Linesmen
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 47717
Location: United States |
#20 Posted: 9/10/2012 7:20:02 PM
If that yutz does win somehow, it will not be a day worth celebrating or gloating over..the same goes for the other guy.
Its a lose lose election. I would rather lose towards the lower class than the military, capitalist thief though. |
|
quote |
|
TheGoldenGoose |
RSI |
MVP
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 18221
Location: United States |
#21 Posted: 9/10/2012 7:26:06 PM
"But President Bush had to spend on the military after 9/11 to get after those criminals who attacked us on our soil"
He had to spend? He went after Saddam who had nothing to do with 9/11.
|
|
quote |
|
TheGoldenGoose |
RSI |
MVP
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 18221
Location: United States |
#22 Posted: 9/10/2012 7:27:47 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: The ten vocal lefties jizzing over the polls are often talking about betting odds, no?
If that yutz does win somehow, it will not be a day worth celebrating or gloating over..the same goes for the other guy.
Its a lose lose election. I would rather lose towards the lower class than the military, capitalist thief though.
You can say that again.
|
|
quote |
|
djbrow |
RSI |
Covers Linesmen
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 11890
Location: United States |
#23 Posted: 9/10/2012 7:28:23 PM {{{you got about ten vocal lefties jizzing over the polls.
i say they are wrong and ive been around long enough to see reagan 1 in 80 and the stupefied dems as well as bush 1. i also remember peter jennings losing his garbage in 94 and the dems having their minds blown in 2010 from their loss.
i am right, i know i'm right and 58 days from now i'll post it here.}}}
You'll be in here posting about how Obama stole the election. I do love the above mentality from right wingers though. It made me a lot of money in 2008 as I could still get Obama -375 a week before the election. |
|
quote |
|
TravelHC |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 164
Location: California |
#24 Posted: 9/10/2012 7:55:07 PM "Bush increased it by more than that. he spent like a drunk democrat. obama moved twice as fast...doubled down on stupid."
Actually he and his congress spent like Republicans since they were in control...also Wonder Boy Ryan was on the budget committee that opted not to pay for the wars, tax cuts, and the prescription drug plan and now Romney/ryan want to cut another 5 trillion in taxes? |
|
quote |
|
bakemcbride |
RSI  |
Legend
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 34070
Location: California |
#25 Posted: 9/10/2012 8:02:25 PM
1) after hearing for a week straight that Romney was out fundraising Obama by a wide margin, are these accurate numbers, and
2) how will fundraising affect both parties down the stretch?
On a different note, has there been talk about the types of debates that will take place (i.e. prescripted questions, etc)
|
|
Posted using a mobile device.quote |