NFL Underdogs: Week 17 pointspread picks

Ashton Grewal - Covers Associate Editor
It doesn’t matter who wins on Sunday between the Bengals and Ravens, Jay Rood will come out a winner. As a bookie, that’s got to be a pretty sweet feeling.

Rood, the race and sportsbook manager at the MGM Mirage properties in Las Vegas, was the first to post NFL season win totals way back in early August and the line that drew the most attention from sharp and public bettors was Cincinnati at 7.5 wins.
Jay Rood's belief in Dalton paid off for the MGM.
“Guys were going on local radio and saying the MGM was giving away free money (because of the Bengal season win total),” Rood said with a chuckle.

I remember being one of those so-called “wise” bettors who saw the Bengals under as easy money. The Cincinnati kids were coming off a 4-12 season and they seemed positioned to start a second-round, rookie QB. No one thought Carson Palmer was an elite quarterback but how could some freckled-faced youngster from TCU improve the position for the Bengals?

“I liked (Andy) Dalton, but I thought that Carson Palmer thing would get worked out and he’d be back under center,” Rood said while explaining his thought process for the Bengals win total.

The professionals disagreed and bet the under early and often. Rood quickly moved the line down from 7.5 to 6.5 and then moved it down again when he upped the limits from $3,000 to $10,000.

“The very first bet we took when we put those totals out was on the Bengals and it was a limit bet.”

The action kept coming in on the Bengals and, by the time the season was about to start, Rood had the total down to 5.5 with the under juiced at -150.

I know I’m supposed to see the book as the enemy, but I talk to sportsbook managers every week and they’re all good people. And, let’s be honest, there’s an element of envy that plays into degenerates disdain for their bookie. Don’t most bettors see working in a sportsbook as a dream job? Aren’t we all, as columnist Jeff Rake says, “wannabe oddsmakers”?

It’s hard not to feel good for a guy like Rood pulling in a six-figure win for his company on that Bengals line. It takes courage and conviction to be the first to post those NFL season win totals.

So, even though the house is always the favorite, this underdog bettor is happy knowing one respected rival is smiling a little bit more this holiday season.

OK, I’m done feeling happy for the bad guys. Let’s get back to the business of picking winners and bringing down the house.

Chicago Bears (+1) at Minnesota Vikings

The Bears know this is their last game of a bitterly disappointing season. After Week 11, Chicago looked like one of the top five teams in the league. Now, all the Monsters of the Midway have to play for is a .500 campaign.

But Bears head coach Lovie Smith knows a thing or two about those plus and minus numbers in the sports section of the newspaper. He’s been known to use pointspreads to motivate his team and I see him doing it again in this game.

Chicago is an underdog against the Adrian Peterson-less Vikings? That’s not going to fly in the Lovie’s locker room.

Bears +1

Kansas City Chiefs (+3.5) at Denver Broncos

The hook hooked me here. I could see either team winning this game and a field-goal finish sounds about right.

Chiefs +3.5
That's a pretty big game...
Dallas Cowboys (+3) at New York Giants

This game is bigger than Katy Perry’s bustline.

For a second straight season, Sunday Night Football in Week 17 is essentially a playoff game. The winner nabs the NFC East and goes to the postseason. The loser goes home.

Tony Romo’s proven he’s a tough tomato, and I think he’ll manage fine with that bruised hand.

The Cowboys are 0-5 ATS against their division this season. How gross is that?

The Giants put up 510 offensive yards last time they played Dallas. Rob Ryan isn’t the best defensive coordinator in the league but something tells me his unit will be much sharper in the rematch.

Pick: Cowboys +3

Last week: 1-2
Season record: 27-22-1


Looking for another way to bash Ashton’s picks? Follow him on Twitter @AshtonGrewal.

If you have any feedback or suggestions for our Editorial Team, please contact us at Editorial

share SHARE rss RSS FEED email EMAIL print PRINT
Hide All Responses

Posted by Saltpetey
4 years ago

I like Chi/Min under 41.5 . No Cutler no Forte no Barber & no Peterson. It looks like most the scoring will have to come off of defensive plays.

Posted by dantanna
4 years ago

take new england minus 7 in the first half buffalo is 3 -13 vs spread in first half this year

Posted by Raines
4 years ago

NFL. WHO KNOWS. What a crap shoot this year. I,m a PACKER fan, can both teams lose here?

Posted by Biscuit
4 years ago

Lovie can't use the point spread to motivate a QB not to turn the ball over. Since Cutler went out, Bears QBs have thrown 4 TDs and 12 INTs. I agree w/Parma, Ponder @ home gets it done today. BOL & Happy New Year

Posted by ynotzepol10
4 years ago

my top 3 pick's are 1)Jets+ 1 1/2 2)Panthers+8 3)Jags-4 1/2 Good Luck!!!

Posted by botk
4 years ago

I got kc +3, my best dog is carolina +7.5

Posted by FeralChild
4 years ago

Can you imagine Lovie saying, "all right guys, you're a 1 point dog...are we gonna take that kind of disrespect?". Bears might win but Lovie showed was a wuss he was against his chief nemesis last week kicking a field goal down 17 at the Packers 12 with 72 seconds left. Can't believe his players weren't shaking their heads at that surrender...

Posted by ykmichael
4 years ago

That KC pick is awfully tempting. Dallas, that seems iffy to me

Posted by PARMATJ25
4 years ago

I like 2 out of the 3 picks, but the logic/motivation for CHI is whacked. I think Urlacher can motivate these guys better than Lovie. But i like MIN here based on better QB play from Ponder and MIN @ home. GL to you & Happy 2012
You are currently not logged in.
Login | Signup | Help
You must be logged in to post a comment.

Top Response

Posted by Raines
4 years ago

"NFL. WHO KNOWS. What a crap shoot this year. I,m a PACKER fan, can both teams lose here? "

!--*** Footer scoreboard ************ -->