San Francisco Giants Picks
4th in National League West
(48 - 67)
Next Game
Fri, Aug 7
22:15 ET
DET @ SF Picks
MLB Picks
Colby Marchio
Contributor
Rafael Devers immediately stands out as one of my favorite hitter looks on Friday. The Giants slugger enters the matchup with an elite Batters-Box rating and covers over 76% of Keider Montero’s arsenal. Devers has been seeing the ball extremely well, posting a .320 BA, 10% strikeout rate and .913 OPS while making 89% contact. Meanwhile, Montero has struggled to limit quality contact against left-handed hitters on the road, allowing a 64% elevation rate and 37.7% hard-hit rate. With Devers owning the hottest bat in San Francisco’s lineup, I am trusting him at home. Take this down to +350.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
When estimating his home run ability, Willy Adames ranks in the 91st percentile according to the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Willy Adames is projected to hit 3rd in the lineup today.. The wind projects to be blowing out to LF at 10.4-mph in this match-up, the most-favorable of the day for bats.. Willy Adames has big-time power (91st percentile) if he makes contact, but that's usually a big "IF" (27.1% K%). Today, however, opposing pitcher Keider Montero struggles to strike batters out (24th percentile K%) — great news for Adames.. Home field advantage typically boosts hitter metrics in all categories, and Willy Adames will hold that advantage in today's game.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Riley Greene in the 95th percentile when estimating his home run talent.. Riley Greene is penciled in 4th on the lineup card in today's game.. The shallowest RF fences in the majors are found in Oracle Park.. The wind projects to be blowing out to LF at 10.4-mph in this match-up, the most-favorable of the day for bats.. Hitting from the opposite that Adrian Houser throws from, Riley Greene will have an edge in today's game.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Bryce Eldridge in the 90th percentile when estimating his home run ability.. Bryce Eldridge has primarily hit in the back-half of the lineup this season (51% of the time), but he is penciled in 1st in the lineup in this matchup.. The shallowest RF fences in the majors are found in Oracle Park.. The wind projects to be blowing out to CF at 12.6-mph in this match-up, the most-favorable of the day for bats.. Bryce Eldridge will have the handedness advantage over Keider Montero in today's matchup.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
As it relates to his home run ability, Rafael Devers ranks in the 97th percentile according to the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Rafael Devers is projected to hit 4th in the batting order in today's game.. The shallowest RF fences in the majors are found in Oracle Park.. The wind projects to be blowing out to LF at 10.4-mph in this match-up, the most-favorable of the day for bats.. Rafael Devers will have the benefit of the platoon advantage against Keider Montero today.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Kevin McGonigle in the 93rd percentile as it relates to his overall offensive skill.. Kevin McGonigle is projected to hit 1st in the lineup in this matchup.. The shallowest RF fences in the majors are found in Oracle Park.. The wind projects to be blowing out to LF at 10.4-mph in this match-up, the most-favorable of the day for bats.. Kevin McGonigle will have the handedness advantage over Adrian Houser in today's matchup.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Kevin McGonigle in the 93rd percentile as it relates to his overall offensive skill.. Kevin McGonigle is projected to hit 1st in the lineup in this matchup.. The shallowest RF fences in the majors are found in Oracle Park.. The wind projects to be blowing out to RF at 12.4-mph in this match-up, the most-favorable of the day for bats.. Kevin McGonigle will have the handedness advantage over Adrian Houser in today's matchup.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
When estimating his home run ability, Willy Adames ranks in the 91st percentile according to the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Willy Adames is projected to hit 3rd in the lineup today.. The wind projects to be blowing out to LF at 10.4-mph in this match-up, the most-favorable of the day for bats.. Willy Adames has big-time power (91st percentile) if he makes contact, but that's usually a big "IF" (27.1% K%). Today, however, opposing pitcher Keider Montero struggles to strike batters out (24th percentile K%) — great news for Adames.. Home field advantage typically boosts hitter metrics in all categories, and Willy Adames will hold that advantage in today's game.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
When estimating his home run ability, Willy Adames ranks in the 91st percentile according to the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Willy Adames is projected to hit 3rd in the lineup today.. The wind projects to be blowing out to LF at 10.4-mph in this match-up, the most-favorable of the day for bats.. Willy Adames has big-time power (91st percentile) if he makes contact, but that's usually a big "IF" (27.1% K%). Today, however, opposing pitcher Keider Montero struggles to strike batters out (24th percentile K%) — great news for Adames.. Home field advantage typically boosts hitter metrics in all categories, and Willy Adames will hold that advantage in today's game.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
As it relates to his home run ability, Rafael Devers ranks in the 97th percentile according to the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Rafael Devers is projected to hit 4th in the batting order in today's game.. The shallowest RF fences in the majors are found in Oracle Park.. The wind projects to be blowing out to CF at 12.6-mph in this match-up, the most-favorable of the day for bats.. Rafael Devers will have the benefit of the platoon advantage against Keider Montero today.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Riley Greene in the 95th percentile when estimating his home run talent.. Riley Greene is penciled in 4th on the lineup card in today's game.. The shallowest RF fences in the majors are found in Oracle Park.. The wind projects to be blowing out to CF at 12.6-mph in this match-up, the most-favorable of the day for bats.. Hitting from the opposite that Adrian Houser throws from, Riley Greene will have an edge in today's game.
Consensus Picks
More ConsensusDET @ SF · Props
| GAME & PLAYER PROPS | PROJECTIONS | ANALYSIS | BEST ODDS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MONEYLINE
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL
|
|||||||
|
SPREAD
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
C. Keith
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.82
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
4.74%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
R. Devers
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.93
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
2.05%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
D. Gilbert
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.80
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-0.65%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
W. Adames
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.91
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-1.28%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
D. Susac
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
0.95
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-1.42%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
J. Baez
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
1.00
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-2.46%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
B. Eldridge
(DH)
0.5 Total Hits
0.97
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-3.13%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
M. Clark
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.93
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.6%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
S. Torkelson
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.93
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.6%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
G. Torres
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
1.08
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-4.73%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
K. McGonigle
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
1.08
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-4.73%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
O. Basabe
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.91
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.64%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
G. McCray
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.72
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-6.72%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
C. Koss
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.81
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-7.33%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
D. Dingler
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
1.17
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
-8.17%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
J. Lee
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.10
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-9.47%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
R. Greene
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.06
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-11.9%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
W. Adames
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
1.65
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
13.7%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
R. Greene
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.79
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
11.56%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
B. Eldridge
(DH)
1.5 Total Bases
1.72
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
10.75%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
R. Devers
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.75
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
10.53%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
K. McGonigle
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
1.76
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
8.17%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
C. Keith
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.81
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
7.76%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
S. Torkelson
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.93
PROJECTION
-0.6
DIFFERENCE
7.4%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
M. Clark
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.36
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
7%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
D. Susac
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
0.95
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
6.73%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
D. Dingler
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
1.73
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
3.47%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
G. McCray
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.12
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
3.12%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
O. Basabe
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
0.91
PROJECTION
-0.6
DIFFERENCE
2.92%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
G. Torres
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.46
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
2.56%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
D. Gilbert
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
0.80
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
2.43%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
Z. McKinstry
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.82
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
2.31%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
C. Koss
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.81
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
0.15%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
J. Baez
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
1.00
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-0.42%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
J. Lee
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.58
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
-0.89%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
K. McGonigle
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.14
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
13.59%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
W. Adames
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.18
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
8.04%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
B. Eldridge
(DH)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.19
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
3.31%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
O. Basabe
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.06
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-3.42%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Lee
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.05
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-3.6%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Clark
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.07
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-3.62%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
G. McCray
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.07
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.52%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
Z. McKinstry
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.05
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-4.68%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
D. Dingler
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.11
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.68%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
R. Greene
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.17
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.75%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
C. Koss
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.05
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-4.9%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Baez
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.06
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.16%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
D. Gilbert
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.07
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.19%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
S. Torkelson
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.14
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.27%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
C. Keith
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.08
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.3%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
G. Torres
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.07
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.56%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
R. Devers
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.21
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-5.69%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
D. Susac
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.09
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-6.07%
EV
|
|||||||
|
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
K. Montero
(SP)
3.5 Strikeouts Thrown
3.98
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-3.73%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
W. Adames
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.65
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
18.75%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
R. Devers
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.71
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
15.84%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
R. Greene
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.74
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
14.22%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
B. Eldridge
(DH)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.52
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
13.11%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
D. Dingler
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.65
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
12.95%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
G. Torres
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.47
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
11.02%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
D. Gilbert
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.36
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
10.93%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
K. McGonigle
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.53
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
10.55%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
S. Torkelson
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.56
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
10.52%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
D. Susac
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.45
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
10.29%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
M. Clark
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.43
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
10.26%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
J. Baez
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.41
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
8.45%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
O. Basabe
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.36
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
6.89%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
G. McCray
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.35
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
5.58%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
J. Lee
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.41
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
5.35%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
Z. McKinstry
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.35
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
4.14%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
C. Koss
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.31
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
2.12%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
C. Keith
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.42
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-1.07%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
R. Greene
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.46
PROJECTION
+1.0
DIFFERENCE
14.73%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
W. Adames
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.15
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
14.44%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
R. Devers
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.28
PROJECTION
+0.8
DIFFERENCE
12.38%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
B. Eldridge
(DH)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.20
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
11.94%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
S. Torkelson
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.05
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
10.9%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
D. Gilbert
(CF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.54
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
9.71%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
D. Dingler
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.38
PROJECTION
+0.9
DIFFERENCE
9.4%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Clark
(CF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.81
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
9.37%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Baez
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.83
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
9.18%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
D. Susac
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.82
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
8.85%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
K. McGonigle
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.35
PROJECTION
+0.9
DIFFERENCE
8.78%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
G. Torres
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.12
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
8.18%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
O. Basabe
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.62
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
5.51%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
G. McCray
(CF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.43
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
3.8%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
Z. McKinstry
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.59
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
3.59%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Lee
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.01
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
2.74%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
C. Koss
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.47
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
1.51%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
C. Keith
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.63
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
-2.43%
EV
|
|||||||
- Proj. Diff: Low to High
- Proj. Diff: High to Low
- Proj. Rating: Low to High
- Proj. Rating: High to Low
- +EV: Low to High
- +EV: High to Low
MONEYLINE
TOTAL
SPREAD
TOTAL HITS
C. Keith
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.82
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
4.74%
EV
TOTAL HITS
R. Devers
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.93
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
2.05%
EV
TOTAL HITS
D. Gilbert
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.80
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-0.65%
EV
TOTAL HITS
W. Adames
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.91
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-1.28%
EV
TOTAL HITS
D. Susac
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
0.95
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-1.42%
EV
TOTAL HITS
J. Baez
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
1.00
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-2.46%
EV
TOTAL HITS
B. Eldridge
(DH)
0.5 Total Hits
0.97
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-3.13%
EV
TOTAL HITS
M. Clark
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.93
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.6%
EV
TOTAL HITS
S. Torkelson
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.93
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.6%
EV
TOTAL HITS
G. Torres
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
1.08
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-4.73%
EV
TOTAL HITS
K. McGonigle
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
1.08
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-4.73%
EV
TOTAL HITS
O. Basabe
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.91
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.64%
EV
TOTAL HITS
G. McCray
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.72
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-6.72%
EV
TOTAL HITS
C. Koss
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.81
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-7.33%
EV
TOTAL HITS
D. Dingler
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
1.17
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
-8.17%
EV
TOTAL HITS
J. Lee
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.10
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-9.47%
EV
TOTAL HITS
R. Greene
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.06
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-11.9%
EV
TOTAL BASES
W. Adames
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
1.65
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
13.7%
EV
TOTAL BASES
R. Greene
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.79
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
11.56%
EV
TOTAL BASES
B. Eldridge
(DH)
1.5 Total Bases
1.72
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
10.75%
EV
TOTAL BASES
R. Devers
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.75
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
10.53%
EV
TOTAL BASES
K. McGonigle
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
1.76
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
8.17%
EV
TOTAL BASES
C. Keith
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.81
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
7.76%
EV
TOTAL BASES
S. Torkelson
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.93
PROJECTION
-0.6
DIFFERENCE
7.4%
EV
TOTAL BASES
M. Clark
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.36
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
7%
EV
TOTAL BASES
D. Susac
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
0.95
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
6.73%
EV
TOTAL BASES
D. Dingler
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
1.73
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
3.47%
EV
TOTAL BASES
G. McCray
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.12
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
3.12%
EV
TOTAL BASES
O. Basabe
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
0.91
PROJECTION
-0.6
DIFFERENCE
2.92%
EV
TOTAL BASES
G. Torres
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.46
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
2.56%
EV
TOTAL BASES
D. Gilbert
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
0.80
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
2.43%
EV
TOTAL BASES
Z. McKinstry
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.82
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
2.31%
EV
TOTAL BASES
C. Koss
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.81
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
0.15%
EV
TOTAL BASES
J. Baez
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
1.00
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-0.42%
EV
TOTAL BASES
J. Lee
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.58
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
-0.89%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
K. McGonigle
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.14
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
13.59%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
W. Adames
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.18
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
8.04%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
B. Eldridge
(DH)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.19
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
3.31%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
O. Basabe
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.06
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-3.42%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Lee
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.05
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-3.6%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Clark
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.07
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-3.62%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
G. McCray
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.07
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.52%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
Z. McKinstry
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.05
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-4.68%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
D. Dingler
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.11
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.68%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
R. Greene
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.17
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.75%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
C. Koss
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.05
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-4.9%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Baez
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.06
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.16%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
D. Gilbert
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.07
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.19%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
S. Torkelson
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.14
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.27%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
C. Keith
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.08
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.3%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
G. Torres
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.07
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.56%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
R. Devers
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.21
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-5.69%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
D. Susac
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.09
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-6.07%
EV
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
K. Montero
(SP)
3.5 Strikeouts Thrown
3.98
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-3.73%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
W. Adames
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.65
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
18.75%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
R. Devers
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.71
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
15.84%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
R. Greene
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.74
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
14.22%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
B. Eldridge
(DH)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.52
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
13.11%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
D. Dingler
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.65
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
12.95%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
G. Torres
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.47
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
11.02%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
D. Gilbert
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.36
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
10.93%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
K. McGonigle
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.53
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
10.55%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
S. Torkelson
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.56
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
10.52%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
D. Susac
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.45
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
10.29%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
M. Clark
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.43
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
10.26%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
J. Baez
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.41
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
8.45%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
O. Basabe
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.36
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
6.89%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
G. McCray
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.35
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
5.58%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
J. Lee
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.41
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
5.35%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
Z. McKinstry
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.35
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
4.14%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
C. Koss
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.31
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
2.12%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
C. Keith
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.42
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-1.07%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
R. Greene
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.46
PROJECTION
+1.0
DIFFERENCE
14.73%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
W. Adames
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.15
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
14.44%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
R. Devers
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.28
PROJECTION
+0.8
DIFFERENCE
12.38%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
B. Eldridge
(DH)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.20
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
11.94%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
S. Torkelson
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.05
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
10.9%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
D. Gilbert
(CF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.54
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
9.71%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
D. Dingler
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.38
PROJECTION
+0.9
DIFFERENCE
9.4%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Clark
(CF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.81
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
9.37%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Baez
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.83
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
9.18%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
D. Susac
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.82
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
8.85%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
K. McGonigle
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.35
PROJECTION
+0.9
DIFFERENCE
8.78%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
G. Torres
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.12
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
8.18%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
O. Basabe
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.62
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
5.51%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
G. McCray
(CF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.43
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
3.8%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
Z. McKinstry
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.59
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
3.59%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Lee
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.01
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
2.74%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
C. Koss
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.47
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
1.51%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
C. Keith
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.63
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
-2.43%
EV