Indiana Advances Sweepstakes Ban Bill to Senate

The bill, which moved quickly through the House, would tighten the regulation of sweepstakes games, sports wagering, and horse racing, though it has been met with resistance from the Social Gaming Leadership Alliance.

Ziv Chen - News Editor at Covers.com
Ziv Chen • News Editor
Feb 3, 2026 • 14:24 ET • 4 min read
Photo By - Reuters Connect.

Indiana lawmakers have rapidly advanced a broad gambling reform bill that tightens oversight of sweepstakes games, sports wagering, and horse racing. The measure now resides with the Senate less than two months after its introduction.

Key Takeaways

  • Indiana House Bill 1052 passed the House and advanced to the Senate for consideration.

  • The bill tightens the regulation of sweepstakes games, sports wagering, and horse racing.

  • Sweepstakes games would be formally defined in state law, with new civil penalties introduced for operators.

Indiana House Bill 1052 (HB 1052), sponsored by Rep. Ethan Manning, moved rapidly through the House after committee amendments, expanding regulatory authority, clarifying wagering prohibitions, and introducing new penalties tied to gaming activities.

The bill was introduced Dec. 5, 2025, and was approved by the Committee on Public Policy on Jan. 20 with a 10-0 vote, and then left the committee on Jan. 27 following several amendments. The full House approved the bill with an 87-11 vote Monday and sent it to the Senate on Tuesday.

Although the legislation includes provisions affecting alcohol and tobacco regulation and age verification for THC products, the core of the bill centers on gambling oversight and enforcement.

The bill would establish a formal statutory definition for sweepstakes games and create civil penalties for individuals or entities that operate them. It would also expand Indiana's voluntary exclusion program, allowing individuals to self-exclude from additional gambling activities beyond existing programs.

The legislation also clarifies wagering restrictions at licensed facilities by explicitly including horse racing. These prohibitions apply to commission members, employees, racing officials, and their spouses. Violations are classified as Class C infractions, with repeat offenses eligible for elevation to a Class A misdemeanor.

There has been some opposition to the bill, however. The Social Gaming Leadership Alliance (SGLA) released a statement after the bill passed the House Committee, expressing its disappointment with the decision and maintaining sweepstakes platforms have been operating lawfully in the state. The SGLA proposed a new framework that could bring Indiana an additional $20 million in revenue from these platforms.

Enjoying Covers content? Add us as a preferred source on your Google account Add as a preferred source on Google

Tennessee lawmakers move to ban sweeps casinos

As Indiana advanced its legislation, Tennessee lawmakers introduced a separate bill aimed specifically at sweepstakes casinos. House Bill 1885 (HB 1885) was introduced by Rep. Scott Cepicky during the current legislative session and classifies sweepstakes casinos as illegal online gambling.

If enacted, the bill would designate illegal gambling and related activities as violations of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act of 1977. Operators found in violation could face civil penalties of up to $15,000 per offense.

The measure also proposes expanding the investigative authority of the state's sports wagering council and the attorney general to pursue unlawful gambling activity.

The bill defines sweepstakes casinos as operators using virtual currency systems for casino-style games, where players can exchange virtual currency for cash or other real-world prizes. The legislation states these platforms function as a facade for real-money gambling without a required gaming license.

HB 1885 follows cease-and-desist letters issued by the Tennessee Attorney General to nearly 40 sweepstakes operators in late December. Some operators agreed to exit the state, while others shut down operations entirely.

A companion measure, Senate Bill 2136, was introduced simultaneously. Neither has made its first appearance in its respective chamber.

Pages related to this topic

Ziv Chen
News Editor

Ziv has been deep in the iGaming trenches for over 20 years, long before most people could spell "geolocation compliance." With a background in marketing and business development at some of the biggest names in gambling tech, Ziv knows the industry from the inside out. Since joining Covers, he's turned his sharp eye (and sharper keyboard) toward everything happening in the fast-moving world of online gambling. Whether it's new state launches, the latest twists in regulation, or what the big operators and game providers are cooking up next, Ziv breaks it all down with clarity, context, and just the right amount of snark. He covers the business side of betting, from affiliate trends and revenue reports to the tech powering your favorite slots. His motto in writing is “let’s make it make sense without putting you to sleep.”

When he’s not tracking gambling legislation or looking for the next breaking story, Ziv is living and dying with every pitch and play from his beloved Pittsburgh Steelers, Pirates, and Penguins. As a Pitt graduate, it’s a city loyalty forged in heartbreak, but one he wouldn’t trade for anything, except maybe a few more playoff wins.

When away from the keyboard, Ziv loves to hit the road and soak up the energy of casinos. Whether strolling the neon jungle called the Vegas Strip, or wandering into a smoky riverboat casino in the Midwest, Ziv’s in his element. He’s the guy chatting with players, blackjack dealers, and asking pit bosses way too many questions, all in the name of “research,” of course. The casino floor isn’t just his workplace, it’s a weird and wonderful ecosystem of flashing lights, wild characters, and pure sensory overload, and he wouldn’t have it any other way.

Popular Content

Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo