Posted:
#676
Quote Originally Posted by drewsmooth:
Hat, I've been winning, thanks.
Hat, I've been winning, thanks.
we all have
0
Ridiculously absurd MLB System!
okok thank you!
Posted:
#683
if every play was -220 odds for +1.5 you would need $16,069.15 to chase those odds thru play E to win a hundred $ profit every series chase
a) $220 / to win $100 L 220 + 100 = 320.00 move dec 2 to the left [3.20 * 220] (for play B) = 704 vvv
b) 704 / to win 100 L 704 + 100 = " " " "
c) 1,768.80 / 100 L
d) 4,111.36 / 100 L
e) 9,264.99 / 100 ?
+
------------------------------
$16,069.15
if you look to profit just 10 dollars a series chase you would need $1,606.92 bank roll to play through 'E' in the strategy & a lot is at risk. playing these straight up without a chase could give you less anxiety
best of luck hat and others looking to profit. the very best!
0
Posted:
#685
Quote Originally Posted by jdbf23:
I dont understand why some One gives a fu%# if someone else here wins or loses? Why doesnt everyone just tail or fade at their own risk ? Why do u care how he decided on a certain wager? You trolls are fkn annoying! They do this to all winners so u must be doing something right hat !
I dont understand why some One gives a fu%# if someone else here wins or loses? Why doesnt everyone just tail or fade at their own risk ? Why do u care how he decided on a certain wager? You trolls are fkn annoying! They do this to all winners so u must be doing something right hat !
0
Posted:
#686
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT:
You didn't create garbage. Don't lie to the sheep. Guys way smarter than you tried this nonsense 50 years ago and went bust.
You first time posters crack me up. I did create this if you know the name of this supposed tout say it or be silent. Another thing sir I never was using AL system so get your facts straight please. It hasnt lost anyway by the way! Really dude get your facts straight. 
0
Posted:
#687
Quote Originally Posted by KEV_BO:
if every play was -220 odds for +1.5 you would need $16,069.15 to chase those odds thru play E to win a hundred $ profit every series chase
if every play was -220 odds for +1.5 you would need $16,069.15 to chase those odds thru play E to win a hundred $ profit every series chase
a) $220 / to win $100 L 220 + 100 = 320.00 move dec 2 to the left [3.20 * 220] (for play B) = 704 vvv
b) 704 / to win 100 L 704 + 100 = " " " "
c) 1,768.80 / 100 L
d) 4,111.36 / 100 L
e) 9,264.99 / 100 ?
+
------------------------------
$16,069.15
if you look to profit just 10 dollars a series chase you would need $1,606.92 bank roll to play through 'E' in the strategy & a lot is at risk. playing these straight up without a chase could give you less anxiety
best of luck hat and others looking to profit. the very best!
Actually it's a lot easier than that to calculate.
Since you are effectively risking $16,069 to win $100, you need to win 99.38% of the time to break even!
This scumbag HAT will tell you the system is 92% or 95% like it was a good thing. And of course, being a 161:1 favorite (laying the same kind of risk), as much as we'd love to see OP lose a play 5 or 6 games deep and be in the streets sucking d|ck, he's likely to go 100% over a sample size of a handful of games. Because he is risking 161:1. Sort of like a reversed parlay, except the juice accumulates from one game to another.
And for something that can happen only 0.62% of the time to break even, if it even happens 1% or 2% of the time, the result can be devastating. This is like a player luckboxing at a parlay 161:1 and the books never being able to recoup their losses. Except this time you are taking the risk of paying out the parlay AND the juice.
I can believe Covers hasn't moved this MARTINGALE scam into the Penalty Box yet. It's not even like OP picks his games based on Amy intellectual factor.
0
Posted:
#688
Quote Originally Posted by m0rtgageguy:
Actually it's a lot easier than that to calculate.
Since you are effectively risking $16,069 to win $100, you need to win 99.38% of the time to break even!
This scumbag HAT will tell you the system is 92% or 95% like it was a good thing. And of course, being a 161:1 favorite (laying the same kind of risk), as much as we'd love to see OP lose a play 5 or 6 games deep and be in the streets sucking d|ck, he's likely to go 100% over a sample size of a handful of games. Because he is risking 161:1. Sort of like a reversed parlay, except the juice accumulates from one game to another.
And for something that can happen only 0.62% of the time to break even, if it even happens 1% or 2% of the time, the result can be devastating. This is like a player luckboxing at a parlay 161:1 and the books never being able to recoup their losses. Except this time you are taking the risk of paying out the parlay AND the juice.
I can believe Covers hasn't moved this MARTINGALE scam into the Penalty Box yet. It's not even like OP picks his games based on Amy intellectual factor.
If your a hater and you know it clap your hands 
If your a hater and you know it clap your hands if your a hater and you know it, then your broke and your bankroll will show it ,if your a hater and you know it clap your hands! 
If your a hater and you know it clap your hands if your a hater and you know it, then your broke and your bankroll will show it ,if your a hater and you know it clap your hands! 0
Posted:
#691
Quote Originally Posted by KEV_BO:
if every play was -220 odds for +1.5 you would need $16,069.15 to chase those odds thru play E to win a hundred $ profit every series chase
if every play was -220 odds for +1.5 you would need $16,069.15 to chase those odds thru play E to win a hundred $ profit every series chase
a) $220 / to win $100 L 220 + 100 = 320.00 move dec 2 to the left [3.20 * 220] (for play B) = 704 vvv
b) 704 / to win 100 L 704 + 100 = " " " "
c) 1,768.80 / 100 L
d) 4,111.36 / 100 L
e) 9,264.99 / 100 ?
+
------------------------------
$16,069.15
if you look to profit just 10 dollars a series chase you would need $1,606.92 bank roll to play through 'E' in the strategy & a lot is at risk. playing these straight up without a chase could give you less anxiety
best of luck hat and others looking to profit. the very best!
please show me where you saw an average line of -220
0
Posted:
#692
Quote Originally Posted by JoeMahirap:
Great start tonight boys. Phillies scored 2 runs in the bottom of the 1st inning. 
HAT I wanted to ask you, how many years back did you check on this system and saw it work when you checked it?
5 so far, but remember all the genius' said it wouldn't work. We must be due for 20+ losses in a row! 
0
Posted:
#693
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT:
5 so far, but remember all the genius' said it wouldn't work. We must be due for 20+ losses in a row!
nah , wont take 20 losses in a row..just 1 loss..to wipe out a whole seasons profit.and then some..guy comes in this thread earlier with just the facts of why this won't succeed long term, and you can only call him a hater , and the sheep, most of whom dont have the bankroll to chase this past a c game let alone an e game..all pile on....its comical how " the greatest system player in the world" cannot understand simple probability and statistics, and can only refute sound logic with insults...
0
Posted:
#695
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT:
5 so far, but remember all the genius' said it wouldn't work. We must be due for 20+ losses in a row!
I wonder if we reverse Martingale system it (of course need to figure out how many times to double down though), what would be the result. I'll take a look at that some time this season when I have a chance, and see the result of the last 5 - 6 years or so.
0
Posted:
#696
Quote Originally Posted by Bart_:
please show me where you saw an average line of -220
i said 'if'
i did some math and was curious to see, at worse with heavy juice, what kind of a roll you need to start 5 game chase. detroit is -230 +1.5 today and although not a play, very high vig. if you like the chase great. its just something to consider if you are planning to play that way. no disrespect toward the thread or intent. example; if the juice is -170 you would need $6,500ish to profit 100 per series. again best of luck to everyones success making money. all the best.
0
Posted:
#698
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT:
If your a hater and you know it clap your hands If your a hater and you know it clap your hands if your a hater and you know it, then your broke and your bankroll will show it ,if your a hater and you know it clap your hands!
If your a hater and you know it clap your hands if your a hater and you know it, then your broke and your bankroll will show it ,if your a hater and you know it clap your hands! Is that all you have to say for yourself for being a fraud?
There are "systems" based on what color of jersey a team is wearing, how long ago since the last rainfall and if the moon is a wanning or waxing crescent. Today we discover a MARTINGALE system that picks games by the time they start at 
Covers is becoming a joke. Threads like that belong in the dumpster. It makes me happy to know what type of suckers exist out there and what they'll do for attention, and it's going to make me even happier when the OP loses a 161:1 ahead shot, goes broke chasing a unit and somehow tries to convince the forum he has enough money to go 7 or 8 games deep.
0
Posted:
#700
Quote Originally Posted by m0rtgageguy:
Is that all you have to say for yourself for being a fraud?
There are "systems" based on what color of jersey a team is wearing, how long ago since the last rainfall and if the moon is a wanning or waxing crescent. Today we discover a MARTINGALE system that picks games by the time they start at
Covers is becoming a joke. Threads like that belong in the dumpster. It makes me happy to know what type of suckers exist out there and what they'll do for attention, and it's going to make me even happier when the OP loses a 161:1 ahead shot, goes broke chasing a unit and somehow tries to convince the forum he has enough money to go 7 or 8 games deep.
What's really a joke is clowns like you coming into threads with nothing to say! 
0
Hot Forum Topics
