I have followed your thread Wayne and your doing a great job showing a sound strategy using accuscore, I am interested in using it for other sports as well. Your NFL picks have been losses but sounds like a cashing fade if it is consistently losing. Thx for sharing with your fellow betters.
0
I have followed your thread Wayne and your doing a great job showing a sound strategy using accuscore, I am interested in using it for other sports as well. Your NFL picks have been losses but sounds like a cashing fade if it is consistently losing. Thx for sharing with your fellow betters.
I have followed your thread Wayne and your doing a great job showing a sound strategy using accuscore, I am interested in using it for other sports as well. Your NFL picks have been losses but sounds like a cashing fade if it is consistently losing. Thx for sharing with your fellow betters.
I'm tracking the NBA some pretty good things going on there too. I want some more data before i post them though.
0
Quote Originally Posted by notagain:
I have followed your thread Wayne and your doing a great job showing a sound strategy using accuscore, I am interested in using it for other sports as well. Your NFL picks have been losses but sounds like a cashing fade if it is consistently losing. Thx for sharing with your fellow betters.
I'm tracking the NBA some pretty good things going on there too. I want some more data before i post them though.
wow 35 % accuracy on Marshall, common sense than would be to take tulsa plus 13 at 65% accuracy, is that correct?
At the end of the first qt of the marshall game i would have bet my left nut on marshall and bet accuscore was wrong. 65% says Tulsa covers wow, amazing. I am becoming a believer thanks for your post
0
Quote Originally Posted by boomersooner18:
wow 35 % accuracy on Marshall, common sense than would be to take tulsa plus 13 at 65% accuracy, is that correct?
At the end of the first qt of the marshall game i would have bet my left nut on marshall and bet accuscore was wrong. 65% says Tulsa covers wow, amazing. I am becoming a believer thanks for your post
Have you seen any games where accuscore is right less than 30% of the time?
That would ensure a fade with 70%+
Plenty of those. They have Ucla -2 but they are only winning 35% between the two. Yestetday tulsa covered if you faded accuscore. I will post them later
0
Quote Originally Posted by SqueaksUofA:
Have you seen any games where accuscore is right less than 30% of the time?
That would ensure a fade with 70%+
Plenty of those. They have Ucla -2 but they are only winning 35% between the two. Yestetday tulsa covered if you faded accuscore. I will post them later
Wayne, You use the same accuscore system for NBA? Is it ready to bet or just a trial? Thanks
Kind of, with the NBA i'm tracking all the plays. They list them from 4 stars to 1 star. I track them that way for ATS and totals and also the way we are doing it here.
I've been tracking the NBA since the 5th. ATS for all star levels is 30-18 over ll. The two star plays themselves are 24-7. Which is odd because none of them would qualify for the 70 percent plays we are doing here. I'm really hesitant to even post them because i think they'll begin trending back to the average here soon.
The 70% NBA plays for totals are 8-3. So far there have only been 4 ATS plays that are 70% and higher and they are 2-2.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jonathan68:
Wayne, You use the same accuscore system for NBA? Is it ready to bet or just a trial? Thanks
Kind of, with the NBA i'm tracking all the plays. They list them from 4 stars to 1 star. I track them that way for ATS and totals and also the way we are doing it here.
I've been tracking the NBA since the 5th. ATS for all star levels is 30-18 over ll. The two star plays themselves are 24-7. Which is odd because none of them would qualify for the 70 percent plays we are doing here. I'm really hesitant to even post them because i think they'll begin trending back to the average here soon.
The 70% NBA plays for totals are 8-3. So far there have only been 4 ATS plays that are 70% and higher and they are 2-2.