Bovada offers Andreozzi at -200 ML. You're saying you got this at +153? Are Brit books really that much better?
You have to realize that's 1.53 times your stake barnone these are European decimal odds. I don't know what -200 equates to. I assume it's 1.5 times your stake?? Anyone
So if you bet 200 dollars you would win 300 back including your 200 dollar stake?
0
Quote Originally Posted by barnone:
Bovada offers Andreozzi at -200 ML. You're saying you got this at +153? Are Brit books really that much better?
You have to realize that's 1.53 times your stake barnone these are European decimal odds. I don't know what -200 equates to. I assume it's 1.5 times your stake?? Anyone
So if you bet 200 dollars you would win 300 back including your 200 dollar stake?
You have to realize that's 1.53 times your stake barnone these are European decimal odds. I don't know what -200 equates to. I assume it's 1.5 times your stake?? Anyone
So if you bet 200 dollars you would win 300 back including your 200 dollar stake?
For example, a (-200) ML bet would pay out $50 if you bet $100. If it was (+200), it pays out $200 if you bet $100. The favorite has a minus number and the dog has a plus number. At least, that's how it works on Bovada and 5 Dimes.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Sentinel3:
You have to realize that's 1.53 times your stake barnone these are European decimal odds. I don't know what -200 equates to. I assume it's 1.5 times your stake?? Anyone
So if you bet 200 dollars you would win 300 back including your 200 dollar stake?
For example, a (-200) ML bet would pay out $50 if you bet $100. If it was (+200), it pays out $200 if you bet $100. The favorite has a minus number and the dog has a plus number. At least, that's how it works on Bovada and 5 Dimes.
You have to realize that's 1.53 times your stake barnone these are European decimal odds. I don't know what -200 equates to. I assume it's 1.5 times your stake?? AnyoneSo if you bet 200 dollars you would win 300 back including your 200 dollar stake?
For example, a (-200) ML bet would pay out $50 if you bet $100. If it was (+200), it pays out $200 if you bet $100. The favorite has a minus number and the dog has a plus number. At least, that's how it works on Bovada and 5 Dimes.
Then Bovada is giving you Andreozzi at 1.50 in European decimal terms barnone. There is no real difference.
0
Quote Originally Posted by barnone:
Quote Originally Posted by Sentinel3:
You have to realize that's 1.53 times your stake barnone these are European decimal odds. I don't know what -200 equates to. I assume it's 1.5 times your stake?? AnyoneSo if you bet 200 dollars you would win 300 back including your 200 dollar stake?
For example, a (-200) ML bet would pay out $50 if you bet $100. If it was (+200), it pays out $200 if you bet $100. The favorite has a minus number and the dog has a plus number. At least, that's how it works on Bovada and 5 Dimes.
Then Bovada is giving you Andreozzi at 1.50 in European decimal terms barnone. There is no real difference.
I guess they feel like the house doesn't have a big enough advantage already. It looks like I have many matches available to me tomorrow. If you can, would you post tonight who you like on the early matches tomorrow morning, much appreciated Sentinel
Okay Jimbob81. These are my plays for tomorrow.
Y.MERTENS@1.53--CHALLENGER NEW DELHI INDIA 8.AM
B.MATTEK-SANDS@1.44--WTA DUBAI (UNITED ARAB EMIRATES)
10.AM
S.KUZNETSOVA@1.44--WTA DUBAI (UNITED ARAB EMIRATES) 16.00PM
B.PAIRE@1.57--ATP MARSEILLE FRANCE 17.30PM
A.RAMOS@1.53--ATP RIO DE JANEIRO BRAZIL 9.00PM
0
Quote Originally Posted by Jimbob81:
I guess they feel like the house doesn't have a big enough advantage already. It looks like I have many matches available to me tomorrow. If you can, would you post tonight who you like on the early matches tomorrow morning, much appreciated Sentinel
Okay Jimbob81. These are my plays for tomorrow.
Y.MERTENS@1.53--CHALLENGER NEW DELHI INDIA 8.AM
B.MATTEK-SANDS@1.44--WTA DUBAI (UNITED ARAB EMIRATES)
10.AM
S.KUZNETSOVA@1.44--WTA DUBAI (UNITED ARAB EMIRATES) 16.00PM
For example, a (-200) ML bet would pay out $50 if you bet $100. If it was (+200), it pays out $200 if you bet $100. The favorite has a minus number and the dog has a plus number. At least, that's how it works on Bovada and 5 Dimes.Then Bovada is giving you Andreozzi at 1.50 in European decimal terms barnone. There is no real difference.
Thanks. I get it now.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Sentinel3:
For example, a (-200) ML bet would pay out $50 if you bet $100. If it was (+200), it pays out $200 if you bet $100. The favorite has a minus number and the dog has a plus number. At least, that's how it works on Bovada and 5 Dimes.Then Bovada is giving you Andreozzi at 1.50 in European decimal terms barnone. There is no real difference.
That was a weird first set, 5 breaks in a row.. not a single one could hold serve.. then of course the last to get breaked was MATTEK.. and MATTEK hold her serves better in the end but couldn't rebreak.. lets go second set!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Sentinel3:
BANKROLL=1089.76 UNITS
BET 118=B.MATTEK-SANDS@1.44 STAKE 10 UNITS
EVENT=WTA DUBAI (UNITED ARAB EMIRATES)
84 WINS 33 LOSSES
That was a weird first set, 5 breaks in a row.. not a single one could hold serve.. then of course the last to get breaked was MATTEK.. and MATTEK hold her serves better in the end but couldn't rebreak.. lets go second set!
That was a weird first set, 5 breaks in a row.. not a single one could hold serve.. then of course the last to get breaked was MATTEK.. and MATTEK hold her serves better in the end but couldn't rebreak.. lets go second set!
Poor performance third set, got double breaked + cant hold a serve.. there was some injury dont know who got it.. :S
0
Quote Originally Posted by Chroem:
That was a weird first set, 5 breaks in a row.. not a single one could hold serve.. then of course the last to get breaked was MATTEK.. and MATTEK hold her serves better in the end but couldn't rebreak.. lets go second set!
Poor performance third set, got double breaked + cant hold a serve.. there was some injury dont know who got it.. :S
That was a weird first set, 5 breaks in a row.. not a single one could hold serve.. then of course the last to get breaked was MATTEK.. and MATTEK hold her serves better in the end but couldn't rebreak.. lets go second set!
Do we dare go Kuznetsov, she lost against a odds 5 and a odds 9 and also a odds 2 the last 3 matches.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Chroem:
That was a weird first set, 5 breaks in a row.. not a single one could hold serve.. then of course the last to get breaked was MATTEK.. and MATTEK hold her serves better in the end but couldn't rebreak.. lets go second set!
Do we dare go Kuznetsov, she lost against a odds 5 and a odds 9 and also a odds 2 the last 3 matches.
That was a weird first set, 5 breaks in a row.. not a single one could hold serve.. then of course the last to get breaked was MATTEK.. and MATTEK hold her serves better in the end but couldn't rebreak.. lets go second set!
Do we dare go Kuznetsov, she lost against a odds 5 and a odds 9 and also a odds 2 the last 3 matches.
Chroem youve gone into panic mode again. IS THIS THE DAY FOR A 5 LOSING STREAK? Could be. In over 10,000 bets Ive only had 6 losing streaks go beyond 4. I doubt theres too many cappers who can say that for nearly 11 thousand bets.
5,5,5,5,6,7 Those are the longest losing streaks ive ever suffered in 8 years and nearly 11 thousand bets. SO THATS WHY I SAY DONT GO CRAZY WITH YOUR STAKES CHROEM. The time to throw down real big is when youve lost 4 in a row. Onto KUZ...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Chroem:
Quote Originally Posted by Chroem:
That was a weird first set, 5 breaks in a row.. not a single one could hold serve.. then of course the last to get breaked was MATTEK.. and MATTEK hold her serves better in the end but couldn't rebreak.. lets go second set!
Do we dare go Kuznetsov, she lost against a odds 5 and a odds 9 and also a odds 2 the last 3 matches.
Chroem youve gone into panic mode again. IS THIS THE DAY FOR A 5 LOSING STREAK? Could be. In over 10,000 bets Ive only had 6 losing streaks go beyond 4. I doubt theres too many cappers who can say that for nearly 11 thousand bets.
5,5,5,5,6,7 Those are the longest losing streaks ive ever suffered in 8 years and nearly 11 thousand bets. SO THATS WHY I SAY DONT GO CRAZY WITH YOUR STAKES CHROEM. The time to throw down real big is when youve lost 4 in a row. Onto KUZ...
That was a weird first set, 5 breaks in a row.. not a single one could hold serve.. then of course the last to get breaked was MATTEK.. and MATTEK hold her serves better in the end but couldn't rebreak.. lets go second set!
Do we dare go Kuznetsov, she lost against a odds 5 and a odds 9 and also a odds 2 the last 3 matches.
Chroem youve gone into panic mode again. IS THIS THE DAY FOR A 5 LOSING STREAK? Could be. In over 10,000 bets Ive only had 6 losing streaks go beyond 4. I doubt theres too many cappers who can say that for nearly 11 thousand bets. 5,5,5,5,6,7 Those are the longest losing streaks ive ever suffered in 8 years and nearly 11 thousand bets. SO THATS WHY I SAY DONT GO CRAZY WITH YOUR STAKES CHROEM. The time to throw down real big is when youve lost 4 in a row. Onto KUZ...
Arhh ok, but do we dare KUZNETSOV ? With The huge losses AS huge favorite.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Sentinel3:
Quote Originally Posted by Chroem:
Quote Originally Posted by Chroem:
That was a weird first set, 5 breaks in a row.. not a single one could hold serve.. then of course the last to get breaked was MATTEK.. and MATTEK hold her serves better in the end but couldn't rebreak.. lets go second set!
Do we dare go Kuznetsov, she lost against a odds 5 and a odds 9 and also a odds 2 the last 3 matches.
Chroem youve gone into panic mode again. IS THIS THE DAY FOR A 5 LOSING STREAK? Could be. In over 10,000 bets Ive only had 6 losing streaks go beyond 4. I doubt theres too many cappers who can say that for nearly 11 thousand bets. 5,5,5,5,6,7 Those are the longest losing streaks ive ever suffered in 8 years and nearly 11 thousand bets. SO THATS WHY I SAY DONT GO CRAZY WITH YOUR STAKES CHROEM. The time to throw down real big is when youve lost 4 in a row. Onto KUZ...
Arhh ok, but do we dare KUZNETSOV ? With The huge losses AS huge favorite.
Do we dare go Kuznetsov, she lost against a odds 5 and a odds 9 and also a odds 2 the last 3 matches.Chroem youve gone into panic mode again. IS THIS THE DAY FOR A 5 LOSING STREAK? Could be. In over 10,000 bets Ive only had 6 losing streaks go beyond 4. I doubt theres too many cappers who can say that for nearly 11 thousand bets. 5,5,5,5,6,7 Those are the longest losing streaks ive ever suffered in 8 years and nearly 11 thousand bets. SO THATS WHY I SAY DONT GO CRAZY WITH YOUR STAKES CHROEM. The time to throw down real big is when youve lost 4 in a row. Onto KUZ... Arhh ok, but do we dare KUZNETSOV ? With The huge losses AS huge favorite.
That is your choice Chroem. Sentinel clearly said "onto Kuz" Why do you continually question him?? I'm pretty sure if all of us could do better than Sentinel than we wouldn't be on here tailing him everyday. And he's not just giving us plays but great advice that you should adhere to. Peace
0
Quote Originally Posted by Chroem:
Do we dare go Kuznetsov, she lost against a odds 5 and a odds 9 and also a odds 2 the last 3 matches.Chroem youve gone into panic mode again. IS THIS THE DAY FOR A 5 LOSING STREAK? Could be. In over 10,000 bets Ive only had 6 losing streaks go beyond 4. I doubt theres too many cappers who can say that for nearly 11 thousand bets. 5,5,5,5,6,7 Those are the longest losing streaks ive ever suffered in 8 years and nearly 11 thousand bets. SO THATS WHY I SAY DONT GO CRAZY WITH YOUR STAKES CHROEM. The time to throw down real big is when youve lost 4 in a row. Onto KUZ... Arhh ok, but do we dare KUZNETSOV ? With The huge losses AS huge favorite.
That is your choice Chroem. Sentinel clearly said "onto Kuz" Why do you continually question him?? I'm pretty sure if all of us could do better than Sentinel than we wouldn't be on here tailing him everyday. And he's not just giving us plays but great advice that you should adhere to. Peace
That was a weird first set, 5 breaks in a row.. not a single one could hold serve.. then of course the last to get breaked was MATTEK.. and MATTEK hold her serves better in the end but couldn't rebreak.. lets go second set!
Do we dare go Kuznetsov, she lost against a odds 5 and a odds 9 and also a odds 2 the last 3 matches.
Chroem youve gone into panic mode again. IS THIS THE DAY FOR A 5 LOSING STREAK? Could be. In over 10,000 bets Ive only had 6 losing streaks go beyond 4. I doubt theres too many cappers who can say that for nearly 11 thousand bets. 5,5,5,5,6,7 Those are the longest losing streaks ive ever suffered in 8 years and nearly 11 thousand bets. SO THATS WHY I SAY DONT GO CRAZY WITH YOUR STAKES CHROEM. The time to throw down real big is when youve lost 4 in a row. Onto KUZ...
Arhh ok, but do we dare KUZNETSOV ? With The huge losses AS huge favorite.
Chroem cool it baby, you dont run from a play based on that. Even top three players can lose to dogs. The pattern has to be broken...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Chroem:
Quote Originally Posted by Sentinel3:
Quote Originally Posted by Chroem:
Quote Originally Posted by Chroem:
That was a weird first set, 5 breaks in a row.. not a single one could hold serve.. then of course the last to get breaked was MATTEK.. and MATTEK hold her serves better in the end but couldn't rebreak.. lets go second set!
Do we dare go Kuznetsov, she lost against a odds 5 and a odds 9 and also a odds 2 the last 3 matches.
Chroem youve gone into panic mode again. IS THIS THE DAY FOR A 5 LOSING STREAK? Could be. In over 10,000 bets Ive only had 6 losing streaks go beyond 4. I doubt theres too many cappers who can say that for nearly 11 thousand bets. 5,5,5,5,6,7 Those are the longest losing streaks ive ever suffered in 8 years and nearly 11 thousand bets. SO THATS WHY I SAY DONT GO CRAZY WITH YOUR STAKES CHROEM. The time to throw down real big is when youve lost 4 in a row. Onto KUZ...
Arhh ok, but do we dare KUZNETSOV ? With The huge losses AS huge favorite.
Chroem cool it baby, you dont run from a play based on that. Even top three players can lose to dogs. The pattern has to be broken...
Hot Forum Topics
