Posted:
#351
BANKROLL=1090.25 UNITS
BET 096=R.VINCI@1.50--STAKE 3 UNITS
EVENT=WTA ST.PETERSBURG RUSSIA
71 WINS--24 LOSSES
CURRENT WINNING STREAK 6 MATCHES...
0
MY TENNIS PICKS 2016
Posted:
#355
Quote Originally Posted by Jimbob81:
Just started looking at this website last week. Incredible job Sentinel, thank you. I started with comparing my picks to yours and they have all been on the money. Cheers!
Thanks Jimbob, it's going very strong at the moment. My best start to a year ever.
Just started looking at this website last week. Incredible job Sentinel, thank you. I started with comparing my picks to yours and they have all been on the money. Cheers!
0
Posted:
#369
Quote Originally Posted by Jimbob81:
Hey Chass, you probably don't even have a job do you? Nothing comes easy...
Hey Chass, you probably don't even have a job do you? Nothing comes easy...
Probably, probably...
Who cares on win/hit ratio if average odds are 1.5.. If i would pick Djokovic only my win/hit ratio would be way better. Would you be dancing then as well? I dont see any argument why exactly a selection is made. Just based on a feel. Wow. Neat. Also when guy was loosing and found himself in 970 something suddenly a 30 unit selections were introduced. Imagine what would happen of those didnt win.
0
Posted:
#371
Quote Originally Posted by accountant4life:
Sentinel, don't even respond to the negative people on here.
The first sign that you are dealing with someone who knows nothing about sports betting. Is they dont realize, if you can come out of a month with even a 7% increase on your bankroll. You have done extremely well. Yes I could stake higher. But im experienced enough to know that one bad losing streak of 6 or more and you would be DESTROYED. If you were risking say 5% of your roll as the starting bet. I dont suffer MANY losing streaks beyond FIVE. In fact in 8 years its only happened twice. A 6 streak and a 7 streak. So knowing that I COULD go nuclear and make three times as much.Sentinel, don't even respond to the negative people on here.
But I believe in the saying TALK QUITELY BUT WALK WITH A BIG STICK. The big stick in this case being your bankroll.
So dont worry no clueless haters are going to scare me away. I have one more pick today. Later, most of you wont be able to play it though because its Estrella at the Santo Domingo challenger tournament. He is the closest thing I see today to a dead cert. And im trying to win my 100th bet this year to end my first hundred picks with a very respectable 74% STRIKERATE...
Tomorrow it will be business as usual and I will have 5 or 6 picks for you guys....
0
Posted:
#373
Quote Originally Posted by Chaz22:
Probably, probably...
Who cares on win/hit ratio if average odds are 1.5.. If i would pick Djokovic only my win/hit ratio would be way better. Would you be dancing then as well? I dont see any argument why exactly a selection is made. Just based on a feel. Wow. Neat. Also when guy was loosing and found himself in 970 something suddenly a 30 unit selections were introduced. Imagine what would happen of those didnt win.
When you can present a100 plays with a better STRIKERATE. AND MORE IMPORTANTLY LESS THAT THREE CONSECUTIVE LOSSES. You have bragging rights, until then you have a lot of work to do.Probably, probably...
Who cares on win/hit ratio if average odds are 1.5.. If i would pick Djokovic only my win/hit ratio would be way better. Would you be dancing then as well? I dont see any argument why exactly a selection is made. Just based on a feel. Wow. Neat. Also when guy was loosing and found himself in 970 something suddenly a 30 unit selections were introduced. Imagine what would happen of those didnt win.
I could risk 5% of my roll because my losing streaks are shorter than any capper I've ever seen. When you pay some guy 300 dollars a month for picks and he gives you 10 straight winners followed by 11 straight losses. You will understand this. A strategy is only as good as its weakest link. And the weakest link is ALWAYS THE LOSING STREAK. And I've yet to see any capper better my lack of long losing streaks. If they existed the gambling industry would be in trouble...
0
Posted:
#374
Quote Originally Posted by coscos:
Hey Sentinel I will be on Estrella as well, but what do you think of Millman? He's in your price range, and he's been on a good run...
Yes my friend I like him too. But if I have to go for just one. ESTRELLA has the edge in my opinion. It's like Gasquet at Montpellier. He is playing a home tournie. He will want to do well in front of his people...
Hey Sentinel I will be on Estrella as well, but what do you think of Millman? He's in your price range, and he's been on a good run...
0
Posted:
#375
Quote Originally Posted by Jimbob81:
If you have it all figured out, why are you here?
If you have it all figured out, why are you here?
Im mostly here to see EPs tournament write-ups but then i noticed this huge thread and started to follow a bit just to see if this strategy is worth it (no no i didnt pick a single bet from here - 1.4 is a dead end IMO). Im not saying its not working it just takes so much time so if someone started with 1000$ he would make 80 bucks in a month. Awesome. The fun thing is that clowns dont realize that and tend to follow this billionair strategy.
0
Hot Forum Topics
