Quote Originally Posted by roberob2u: @wgomel21 LMFAO come on linda. We need that baseball play from the GOAT. Go take the Blue Jays and get off of my tit. No need to thank me.
@bringit
Any thoughts on the doubles match in the morning? TT and Siniakova are -500 right now for me on FD. They won the last matchup at Indian Wells but Danilina/Krunic beat them earlier this year at the AO and beat them last year here at RG.
@bringit
Any thoughts on the doubles match in the morning? TT and Siniakova are -500 right now for me on FD. They won the last matchup at Indian Wells but Danilina/Krunic beat them earlier this year at the AO and beat them last year here at RG.
@mrnotoriousman
Yeah they have a history against each other for sure. After losing to them at RG last year they actually got bageled in the third set against them in Australia. It's hard for me to fathom that happening to them at a grand slam but I was unable to watch the match so I'm not sure what happened.
I did back them to get their revenge at Indian Wells in straight sets though and they came out pretty flawlessly just as I would've expected them to when they've got a vendetta out for someone. Danikrun played excellent in that match too though and it was a great match with two tight sets. And I do think danikrun are obviously the second best team in the world right now.
But no way I'd bet against Siniakova/Townsend right now. I like them to win in straight sets but that's juicy at like -160. I don't think they will drop a set though. With grand slams using advantage scoring it makes for much less volatility so the better team typically comes out on top. That Dabrowski team has been excellent all tournament too and they completely dismantled them so it's pretty clear they are dialed in right now. And when they're like that they're unbeatable. They can only beat themselves and they're too locked in to allow that to happen. They are not always like this but when they are it's similar to say Sinner versus the field. They're just that dominant.
If your book offers -4.5 I think that is worth a look. I typically wouldn't like that large of a spread in doubles, especially with as tight as their previous matches have been. But while danikrun have had a clean run here they have at times been vulnerable on serve on this slower surface but they have been able to break their opponents enough to make up for it. I can see Siniakova/Townsend easily getting through this match surrendering one, maybe two breaks but they should be able to generate at least 3-5 breaks on return which should allow them to cover the 4.5 imo.
Also they had 0 double faults last match and a total of 6 in 5 matches here. That is low for them and it's typically a good indicator of where they're at.
@mrnotoriousman
Yeah they have a history against each other for sure. After losing to them at RG last year they actually got bageled in the third set against them in Australia. It's hard for me to fathom that happening to them at a grand slam but I was unable to watch the match so I'm not sure what happened.
I did back them to get their revenge at Indian Wells in straight sets though and they came out pretty flawlessly just as I would've expected them to when they've got a vendetta out for someone. Danikrun played excellent in that match too though and it was a great match with two tight sets. And I do think danikrun are obviously the second best team in the world right now.
But no way I'd bet against Siniakova/Townsend right now. I like them to win in straight sets but that's juicy at like -160. I don't think they will drop a set though. With grand slams using advantage scoring it makes for much less volatility so the better team typically comes out on top. That Dabrowski team has been excellent all tournament too and they completely dismantled them so it's pretty clear they are dialed in right now. And when they're like that they're unbeatable. They can only beat themselves and they're too locked in to allow that to happen. They are not always like this but when they are it's similar to say Sinner versus the field. They're just that dominant.
If your book offers -4.5 I think that is worth a look. I typically wouldn't like that large of a spread in doubles, especially with as tight as their previous matches have been. But while danikrun have had a clean run here they have at times been vulnerable on serve on this slower surface but they have been able to break their opponents enough to make up for it. I can see Siniakova/Townsend easily getting through this match surrendering one, maybe two breaks but they should be able to generate at least 3-5 breaks on return which should allow them to cover the 4.5 imo.
Also they had 0 double faults last match and a total of 6 in 5 matches here. That is low for them and it's typically a good indicator of where they're at.
You are acting like a whiny little girl. You need to get over yourself. You aren't that good. No reply necessary.
You are acting like a whiny little girl. You need to get over yourself. You aren't that good. No reply necessary.
Wasted too much time dealing with you already so we googled something for you.
Admitting you’re wrong is one of the most human yet challenging acts — it requires vulnerability, self-awareness, and a willingness to change.
Wasted too much time dealing with you already so we googled something for you.
Admitting you’re wrong is one of the most human yet challenging acts — it requires vulnerability, self-awareness, and a willingness to change.
Andre Agassi says Zev in 4. With his knowledge and having his boots on the ground, why would you test that? It sure appears it is Zev's time. No value for any play here.
Andre Agassi says Zev in 4. With his knowledge and having his boots on the ground, why would you test that? It sure appears it is Zev's time. No value for any play here.
The Heels had a very nice bounce back from Friday's collapse. Hard not to favor them but let that one go. To big of a risk and not enough reward. If you are wanting some potential action, take a look at the Tigers and the Fish. ![]()
* Diamond play will be later
The Heels had a very nice bounce back from Friday's collapse. Hard not to favor them but let that one go. To big of a risk and not enough reward. If you are wanting some potential action, take a look at the Tigers and the Fish. ![]()
* Diamond play will be later

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.