Take the top 3 teams with the highest win %, and chase them on the RL. If the team is an underdog for the day, then play the ML on that day. Also, take the bottom 2 teams of the league, and fade them on the RL.
Re-calculate your teams at the beginning of each week.
So far, since May 1st the results would be.. 48 wins, 37 losses. (48-0 using the chase method) - Betting to win 1% of your bankroll, would show a ROI of 45.77% in 20 days!
May 21st...
Pittsburgh (+105) ML Game 1 Milwaukee (+122) ML Game 1 Kansas City (+100) RL Game 1 Toronto (+155) ML Game 1
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Let's try this one....
Take the top 3 teams with the highest win %, and chase them on the RL. If the team is an underdog for the day, then play the ML on that day. Also, take the bottom 2 teams of the league, and fade them on the RL.
Re-calculate your teams at the beginning of each week.
So far, since May 1st the results would be.. 48 wins, 37 losses. (48-0 using the chase method) - Betting to win 1% of your bankroll, would show a ROI of 45.77% in 20 days!
May 21st...
Pittsburgh (+105) ML Game 1 Milwaukee (+122) ML Game 1 Kansas City (+100) RL Game 1 Toronto (+155) ML Game 1
https://www.vegasinsider.com/mlb/stats/totals-report/ That is a link to the totals report, once you are there you can click on a team and see very quickly the final score for all games played in '09.
Sofar I just glanced at Toronto. Now they may not have been in 1st place the entire year but the point I wanted to know was how many games after a RL loser until the next one. What I saw was that the max was 4. Today vs. the RedSox is another one that if they lose, it cause the chase to go to 5 for the 1st time. If I get time I will look at a few others.
I am trying to figure out the best way to bet this. I don't think I will double up on the chase however a mild progression should work fine because there are times that the wins come very close together.
0
https://www.vegasinsider.com/mlb/stats/totals-report/ That is a link to the totals report, once you are there you can click on a team and see very quickly the final score for all games played in '09.
Sofar I just glanced at Toronto. Now they may not have been in 1st place the entire year but the point I wanted to know was how many games after a RL loser until the next one. What I saw was that the max was 4. Today vs. the RedSox is another one that if they lose, it cause the chase to go to 5 for the 1st time. If I get time I will look at a few others.
I am trying to figure out the best way to bet this. I don't think I will double up on the chase however a mild progression should work fine because there are times that the wins come very close together.
Yeah cisco, you play on + money basically every time. It's not a double up... you adjust your risk amount according to the line you get. I'll be able to explain more later.
0
Yeah cisco, you play on + money basically every time. It's not a double up... you adjust your risk amount according to the line you get. I'll be able to explain more later.
What I do, is start out to bet to win a certain amount. Let's say my game 1 is at +140. Let's say I want to win $100... so my wager would be $71.43 to win $100. If I lose, then I go to the next game. Let's say game 2 will be at +150 odds. So I just add together my losses and divide by the + line. So in game 2 my wager would be $114.28 to win $173.43. This way I recoup my losses, and still manage to keep my risk low. The deepest chase so far is game 5.
Also well worth noting, that a few teams a play came up forcing us to take a (-) line. This happens when both teams are (-) and the RL is at +1½ on our side. To my knowledge this has happened 7 times this month and the record is at 7-0.
May 22nd...
LA Dodgers (+165) RL Game 1 Milwaukee (+106) ML Game 1 Toronto (-105) RL Game 2 Cincinnati (+160) RL Game 2 *Fading Cleveland Baltimore (+110) ML Game 2 *Fading Washington
Records since beginning to post: - Flat wagering (1-3) 33% -.80 units. - Chase system (1-0) + 1.00 unit. 3 Pending.
0
What I do, is start out to bet to win a certain amount. Let's say my game 1 is at +140. Let's say I want to win $100... so my wager would be $71.43 to win $100. If I lose, then I go to the next game. Let's say game 2 will be at +150 odds. So I just add together my losses and divide by the + line. So in game 2 my wager would be $114.28 to win $173.43. This way I recoup my losses, and still manage to keep my risk low. The deepest chase so far is game 5.
Also well worth noting, that a few teams a play came up forcing us to take a (-) line. This happens when both teams are (-) and the RL is at +1½ on our side. To my knowledge this has happened 7 times this month and the record is at 7-0.
May 22nd...
LA Dodgers (+165) RL Game 1 Milwaukee (+106) ML Game 1 Toronto (-105) RL Game 2 Cincinnati (+160) RL Game 2 *Fading Cleveland Baltimore (+110) ML Game 2 *Fading Washington
Records since beginning to post: - Flat wagering (1-3) 33% -.80 units. - Chase system (1-0) + 1.00 unit. 3 Pending.
joe money. I like this system. with my book, I am able to change the runline to -2.5 and get crazy odds like +370... what do you think about maybe chasing up to 8 - 10 times with the better odds? would probably be about the same risk as chasing 5 times at the 1.5 runline but how often would the team win by 2 rather than 3...?
0
joe money. I like this system. with my book, I am able to change the runline to -2.5 and get crazy odds like +370... what do you think about maybe chasing up to 8 - 10 times with the better odds? would probably be about the same risk as chasing 5 times at the 1.5 runline but how often would the team win by 2 rather than 3...?
That is pretty crazy... Its worth a shot... my guess is you'd probably make the same amount of money. You could win 2 or 3 times, but the time you are probably going to win once. And 2 or 3 wins will be more profit than just 1... even though it may seem like a lot from the chase.
Example... If I were to win 3 game 1's @ $100.. I'd be up $300. - You could be down (0-3) and win your 4th game of your chase for some crazy +350.. but just be up $100, plus your losses. So I'd be well ahead of you.
The Risk formula should look like this...
Amount to win / (losses + odds). - If you have a (-) line... then you should multiply instead of divide.
On the last note... Bryan perhaps.... follow 1 team or so, and see how that turns out. Not sure if you want to lay less money and win less often... or lay a little more money, more less often, but have a bigger profit.
0
That is pretty crazy... Its worth a shot... my guess is you'd probably make the same amount of money. You could win 2 or 3 times, but the time you are probably going to win once. And 2 or 3 wins will be more profit than just 1... even though it may seem like a lot from the chase.
Example... If I were to win 3 game 1's @ $100.. I'd be up $300. - You could be down (0-3) and win your 4th game of your chase for some crazy +350.. but just be up $100, plus your losses. So I'd be well ahead of you.
The Risk formula should look like this...
Amount to win / (losses + odds). - If you have a (-) line... then you should multiply instead of divide.
On the last note... Bryan perhaps.... follow 1 team or so, and see how that turns out. Not sure if you want to lay less money and win less often... or lay a little more money, more less often, but have a bigger profit.
Baltimore (+130) RL Game 1 *Fading Washington Cincinnati (-108) ML Game 1 *Fading Cleveland LA Dodgers (+170) RL Game 2 Milwaukee (+150) RL Game 2 Toronto (+126) ML Game 3
Current Record is... (3-6) 33% (-2.84 units) *Flat Betting. (3-0) +3.00 units 3 Pending. *Chasing.
0
Anyways plays for today are...
Baltimore (+130) RL Game 1 *Fading Washington Cincinnati (-108) ML Game 1 *Fading Cleveland LA Dodgers (+170) RL Game 2 Milwaukee (+150) RL Game 2 Toronto (+126) ML Game 3
Current Record is... (3-6) 33% (-2.84 units) *Flat Betting. (3-0) +3.00 units 3 Pending. *Chasing.
joe money. I like this system. with my book, I am able to change the runline to -2.5 and get crazy odds like +370... what do you think about maybe chasing up to 8 - 10 times with the better odds? would probably be about the same risk as chasing 5 times at the 1.5 runline but how often would the team win by 2 rather than 3...?
bryan, are you using a local or online? If online, which site?
0
Quote Originally Posted by bryan11:
joe money. I like this system. with my book, I am able to change the runline to -2.5 and get crazy odds like +370... what do you think about maybe chasing up to 8 - 10 times with the better odds? would probably be about the same risk as chasing 5 times at the 1.5 runline but how often would the team win by 2 rather than 3...?
bryan, are you using a local or online? If online, which site?
Yeah.. I hope to keep it pretty accurate. I just wish Toronto would win already!!
May 24th....
Toronto (+121) ML Game 4 Milwaukee (+110) ML Game 3 LA Dodgers (+115) RL Game 2 Cincinnati (+100) ML Game 2 *Fading Cleveland Baltimore (+117) ML Game 1 *Fading Washington
Yeah.. I hope to keep it pretty accurate. I just wish Toronto would win already!!
May 24th....
Toronto (+121) ML Game 4 Milwaukee (+110) ML Game 3 LA Dodgers (+115) RL Game 2 Cincinnati (+100) ML Game 2 *Fading Cleveland Baltimore (+117) ML Game 1 *Fading Washington
joe money. just did a little bit of back dating... Just looked at Detroit. from may 2 to may 20, they didn't have a win by 2 or more... thats 16 in a row. how many games are you going to be chasing this year in case something like this happens?
0
joe money. just did a little bit of back dating... Just looked at Detroit. from may 2 to may 20, they didn't have a win by 2 or more... thats 16 in a row. how many games are you going to be chasing this year in case something like this happens?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.