
Saturday RESULTS, game 1, Dallas -155 and Boston-150, $11 to win $19.16 - WINNER!
2017-2018 Won/Loss: $1,075.12
Current Bankroll: $2,570.09 ($1,830.09 gain, 247.3% gain on bankroll)
Original Bankroll (2016-2017) : $740
Since posting in 2014-2015 season
Overall 149-2 (+$4,256.89)
Saturday RESULTS, game 1, Dallas -155 and Boston-150, $11 to win $19.16 - WINNER!
2017-2018 Won/Loss: $1,075.12
Current Bankroll: $2,570.09 ($1,830.09 gain, 247.3% gain on bankroll)
Original Bankroll (2016-2017) : $740
Since posting in 2014-2015 season
Overall 149-2 (+$4,256.89)
If you don’t mind me asking. What is the criteria for making a play on the road teams
If you don’t mind me asking. What is the criteria for making a play on the road teams
If you don’t mind me asking. What is the criteria for making a play on the road teams
If you don’t mind me asking. What is the criteria for making a play on the road teams
it was just a question to try to better understand the system. a system shouldn't require capping IMO. i'm asking honestly b/c i want to learn how he arrived at it, so i'll wait for Dan to answer. thanks.
BTW buckeye, this is from the first post in the thread: "The basic concept is to parlay the strongest 2 road teams each night. For example if Boston is -120, NYR +110 and Toronto +125 are the 3 road teams, you'd parlay Boston -120 and NYR +110"
i know that it has probably changed over time, and i tried reading most of this thread before the season so i would understand any changes in the system, but it's a pretty long thread.
it was just a question to try to better understand the system. a system shouldn't require capping IMO. i'm asking honestly b/c i want to learn how he arrived at it, so i'll wait for Dan to answer. thanks.
BTW buckeye, this is from the first post in the thread: "The basic concept is to parlay the strongest 2 road teams each night. For example if Boston is -120, NYR +110 and Toronto +125 are the 3 road teams, you'd parlay Boston -120 and NYR +110"
i know that it has probably changed over time, and i tried reading most of this thread before the season so i would understand any changes in the system, but it's a pretty long thread.
yeah, the reason i ask is i've seen on rare occasion where Dan has changed his pick. it's not a big deal, i'll probably just play both NAS and WAS with BOS. maybe hit both. have enough built up it won't hurt the bank.
yeah, the reason i ask is i've seen on rare occasion where Dan has changed his pick. it's not a big deal, i'll probably just play both NAS and WAS with BOS. maybe hit both. have enough built up it won't hurt the bank.
it was just a question to try to better understand the system. a system shouldn't require capping IMO. i'm asking honestly b/c i want to learn how he arrived at it, so i'll wait for Dan to answer. thanks.
BTW buckeye, this is from the first post in the thread: "The basic concept is to parlay the strongest 2 road teams each night. For example if Boston is -120, NYR +110 and Toronto +125 are the 3 road teams, you'd parlay Boston -120 and NYR +110"
i know that it has probably changed over time, and i tried reading most of this thread before the season so i would understand any changes in the system, but it's a pretty long thread.
I've tried to stay away from road dogs and stick to only faves. Not written in stone, but mostly. A slight modification of the system. I don't mind skipping some days.
it was just a question to try to better understand the system. a system shouldn't require capping IMO. i'm asking honestly b/c i want to learn how he arrived at it, so i'll wait for Dan to answer. thanks.
BTW buckeye, this is from the first post in the thread: "The basic concept is to parlay the strongest 2 road teams each night. For example if Boston is -120, NYR +110 and Toronto +125 are the 3 road teams, you'd parlay Boston -120 and NYR +110"
i know that it has probably changed over time, and i tried reading most of this thread before the season so i would understand any changes in the system, but it's a pretty long thread.
I've tried to stay away from road dogs and stick to only faves. Not written in stone, but mostly. A slight modification of the system. I don't mind skipping some days.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.