I, apparently, am a mathematical "moron" to coin a term.
A local barfly recommended that I understand Bayes theorem to be a better handicapper. That eventually led to a wikipedia entry regarding the Monty Hall problem. I still don't fully understand the solution, but I think I am getting there.
Anyway, that led me to ponder a similar problem relating to a modern gameshow - the one with all the suitcases that Howie Mandel hosts. I wonder if, when he gets down to the last 2 cases, would a contestant be better off by switching? I assume he would, but I don't want to assume anyting that can be proven. So, do we have any math guys in here that would care to discuss this?
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I, apparently, am a mathematical "moron" to coin a term.
A local barfly recommended that I understand Bayes theorem to be a better handicapper. That eventually led to a wikipedia entry regarding the Monty Hall problem. I still don't fully understand the solution, but I think I am getting there.
Anyway, that led me to ponder a similar problem relating to a modern gameshow - the one with all the suitcases that Howie Mandel hosts. I wonder if, when he gets down to the last 2 cases, would a contestant be better off by switching? I assume he would, but I don't want to assume anyting that can be proven. So, do we have any math guys in here that would care to discuss this?
No, this could not be used in Deal or No Deal. The reason is because YOU decide which case gets eliminated, instead of the host who is aware which case yields which prize.
0
No, this could not be used in Deal or No Deal. The reason is because YOU decide which case gets eliminated, instead of the host who is aware which case yields which prize.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.