i want to thank everyone that has done the dilegence on this thread and system. The information is more then helpful. I have been following it only only since yesterday(the following it part was funny after I reread it) anyways i read everypost and seems like there has to be some filter whatever it may be that would reduce those 6 losses so far. they may not have been wins but would not be a 1 intthe L coloumn. So the thought would be to find the link between them and place the filter so that it doesnt reduce the amount of plays but the amount of losses. I know this all sounds rudimentary, but a little tweaking here and there to reduce loss can not and never will hurt.
I dont mean to sound brash and there is no pointing and laughing I think that Tony and you 2 have done a phenomenal job.
I do have a question though since overall I am new to the entire world of systematic wagering. On the posts when it xxx(xxxto lose) game 1 or game 2 the game part means what game in the series or system it is? and if it has the (xxx to lose you are actually playing the away team to fade as opposedto the home team to win?
Thanks folks i love all of this numbers and money cant help it sounds like yall cant either.
Will look at some stuff over the next 2 days to see if I cant find some filters that help reduce the amount of losses, if you already know then please post as to save me from posting what is already known.
Maybe its just the logic as in last place home team bad bet i would imagine
or betting on a top tier team when they are the away team.
Sorry for the ramble thanks for reading
0
i want to thank everyone that has done the dilegence on this thread and system. The information is more then helpful. I have been following it only only since yesterday(the following it part was funny after I reread it) anyways i read everypost and seems like there has to be some filter whatever it may be that would reduce those 6 losses so far. they may not have been wins but would not be a 1 intthe L coloumn. So the thought would be to find the link between them and place the filter so that it doesnt reduce the amount of plays but the amount of losses. I know this all sounds rudimentary, but a little tweaking here and there to reduce loss can not and never will hurt.
I dont mean to sound brash and there is no pointing and laughing I think that Tony and you 2 have done a phenomenal job.
I do have a question though since overall I am new to the entire world of systematic wagering. On the posts when it xxx(xxxto lose) game 1 or game 2 the game part means what game in the series or system it is? and if it has the (xxx to lose you are actually playing the away team to fade as opposedto the home team to win?
Thanks folks i love all of this numbers and money cant help it sounds like yall cant either.
Will look at some stuff over the next 2 days to see if I cant find some filters that help reduce the amount of losses, if you already know then please post as to save me from posting what is already known.
Maybe its just the logic as in last place home team bad bet i would imagine
or betting on a top tier team when they are the away team.
Can someone help me understand something about this system...How come I see NYM Game 1 and STL Game 1 when neither team is playing today?? What does that mean?
0
Can someone help me understand something about this system...How come I see NYM Game 1 and STL Game 1 when neither team is playing today?? What does that mean?
Can someone help me understand something about this system...How come I see NYM Game 1 and STL Game 1 when neither team is playing today?? What does that mean?
Why should STL and NYM not play today ? https://scores.covers.com/baseball-scores-matchups.aspx
0
Quote Originally Posted by deadgoneblitz26:
Can someone help me understand something about this system...How come I see NYM Game 1 and STL Game 1 when neither team is playing today?? What does that mean?
Why should STL and NYM not play today ? https://scores.covers.com/baseball-scores-matchups.aspx
Glad to see people are understanding clearly on their own!! Grrrrreat!
Feel free to ask any questions....
With regards to the FILTERS, threeg5, filters are what touts use to sell their "145-0 system" plays, and there's no way any filter would have kept out STL and NYY (both system losses this season)...
With each loss costing approx 25 units, assuming an average -150 wager per chase bet... if a team was underdogs the entire chase, a system loss is only about 15 units... That being said, this 170-6 record is yielding anywhere between +50 to +80 units, which is more than enough for me!
0
Glad to see people are understanding clearly on their own!! Grrrrreat!
Feel free to ask any questions....
With regards to the FILTERS, threeg5, filters are what touts use to sell their "145-0 system" plays, and there's no way any filter would have kept out STL and NYY (both system losses this season)...
With each loss costing approx 25 units, assuming an average -150 wager per chase bet... if a team was underdogs the entire chase, a system loss is only about 15 units... That being said, this 170-6 record is yielding anywhere between +50 to +80 units, which is more than enough for me!
7/31 Friday CLE (DET to Lose) Game 1 CIN (COL to Lose) Game 1 NYM Game 1 ATL (LAD to Lose) Game 1 ATL Game 1 STL Game 1 Overall Record for this is 172-6 (Last Lost on Tuesday, July 28th with the Arizona Diamondbacks)
0
7/31 Friday CLE (DET to Lose) Game 1 CIN (COL to Lose) Game 1 NYM Game 1 ATL (LAD to Lose) Game 1 ATL Game 1 STL Game 1 Overall Record for this is 172-6 (Last Lost on Tuesday, July 28th with the Arizona Diamondbacks)
Can't help there, Gameboy...Only been following for about 1+ month and just remember my losses....
Although I would like to know the actual +/- units of the system...
Going back to my statement about filters earlier, sometimes I do decide NOT to follow a system bet if it's a terrible & slumping team vs. a good hot-streak team... and NEVER bet the Nats
0
Can't help there, Gameboy...Only been following for about 1+ month and just remember my losses....
Although I would like to know the actual +/- units of the system...
Going back to my statement about filters earlier, sometimes I do decide NOT to follow a system bet if it's a terrible & slumping team vs. a good hot-streak team... and NEVER bet the Nats
ATL (LAD to Lose) Game 2 ATL Game 2 NYM Game 2 BAL (BOS to Lose) Game 1 MIN Game 1 CIN (COL to Lose) Game 2 SF Game 1 Overall Record for this is 176-6 (Last Lost on Tuesday, July 28th with the Arizona Diamondbacks)
0
8/1 Saturday
ATL (LAD to Lose) Game 2 ATL Game 2 NYM Game 2 BAL (BOS to Lose) Game 1 MIN Game 1 CIN (COL to Lose) Game 2 SF Game 1 Overall Record for this is 176-6 (Last Lost on Tuesday, July 28th with the Arizona Diamondbacks)
Glad I didn't check in time to bet A's , but mad that I rememebred to bet Game 3 of the anti-Rockies bet (DAMN THE REDS SUCK!!!) ...
P.S. you'd have to have to be crazy to have gotten on a "BOS to lose" chase, esp. against Baltimore! I will be betting the "BOS to lose" chase after this Baltimore series is done (looks like they'll be swept) cuz the next two opponents are TB and NYY, of which I think there'll be at least one Boston loss... Cheers and GL all!
0
Glad I didn't check in time to bet A's , but mad that I rememebred to bet Game 3 of the anti-Rockies bet (DAMN THE REDS SUCK!!!) ...
P.S. you'd have to have to be crazy to have gotten on a "BOS to lose" chase, esp. against Baltimore! I will be betting the "BOS to lose" chase after this Baltimore series is done (looks like they'll be swept) cuz the next two opponents are TB and NYY, of which I think there'll be at least one Boston loss... Cheers and GL all!
The information is more then helpful. I have been following it only only since yesterday
(the following it part was funny after I reread it) anyways i read everypost and seems like there has to be some filter whatever it may be that would reduce those 6 losses so far. they may not have been wins but would not be a 1 intthe L coloumn. So the thought would be to find the link between them and place the filter so that it doesnt reduce the amount of plays but the amount of losses. I know this all sounds rudimentary, but a little tweaking here and there to reduce loss can not and never will hurt.
Hot Forum Topics
