Raiders22

BOL 

303-279     +1446

2U DET 1st5 -.5 -120

2U NYY 1st5 -.5 -146

2U NYM 1st5 -.5 -101

DET -179

PHL 1st5 U4 -119

PHL 1st5 -.5 -119

COL TT U2.5 +111

NYM -148

MIL -125

SD TT U3.5 +118

AZ TT O4.5 +110

LAD O9 -105

BOL 

BOL 

297-272     +1616

2U DET 1st5 -.5 -125

DET -162

DET U8 -104

CHC 1st5 -.5 -139

PHL 1st5 U4.5 -105

PHL 1st5 -.5 -126

CHW TT U2.5 -134

BLT O9 +102

BLT 1st5 O5 -103

TB -1.5 +198

TB U7 +104

NYY 1st5 -.5 -118

HOU NRFI -149

Buena suerte 

@newmarket
Yessir, somewhere close to that is likely 

@OO7CRUSHER

 Yessir.  Maybe only a few more big weeks before it drops way off.  Especially after the break. 

BOL 

BOL 

281-259    +1504

2U NYM 1st5 -.5 -104

2U DET 1st5 -.5 +115

2U KC -146

PHL 1st5 U4 -106

PHL 1st5 -.5 +126

LAA O10 -116

LAA 1st5 O5.5 -116

NYY 1st5 +.5 -111

BOS TT U4.5 -120

TB +1.5 -152
NYM -155

NYM U8 -114

DET -136

DET U8 -109

COL TT U3.5 -143

TX U9 -112

MN TT U3.5 +112

HOU -110

STL 1st5 +.5 -110

LAD O7.5 +100

HOU NRFI -108

CHW NRFI -117

TB NRFI -118

AZ NRFI +116

LAA NRFI +112

TOR YRFI -103

SEA YRFI +114

@StumpTownStu

 Yes. You are technically correct.  But it is easier to explain that way.  
  Early on I explained the difficulty they have always had with developing a vaccine for an URI.

The mutation part of it is what I was comparing to the yearly flu vaccine.  

But it was not.  All studies have shown this.  Look at the damage that was done by the original strain before the vaccine was available.  Then look at the damage done by the strain that came next and bypassed the vaccine.  Etc., etc.

Yes, because in the back of folk’s minds (including the non-silenced experts) the vaccine was a cure-all — like, say the smallpox or measles vaccine.  But being a flu, it does not work that way.  You cannot stay ‘in front’ of it with a vaccine. 
Any cautionary voice was silenced and/or canceled.  You see some popping back up now on some outlets.  

@joe pockets

Yessir.  That is why I say it was more agenda-driven and not health-driven. 

@joe pockets

  Yessir.  But when you have something that has not been properly studied you cannot fully assess  the side effects and determine accurately whether the risk/reward is proper.  
   For sure, since you are older, you were in a higher risk group and the vaccine seemed to adversely affect other groups more than your group.  This was suppressed and not made fully available to the public or even the medical industry.  So, how can doctors and patients make an accurate determination if the reward outweighed the risk.  
   Then you couple this with the misinformation being spread by the ‘experts’ about how bad the Wuhan Flu was and how deadly it was, you then scare folks in to taking something not fully studied and not needed for all groups of people.  
   To have policy, more or less, set by non-elected folks with an agenda by forcing folks to take an unproven vaccine, with undetermined side effects, was simply awful and a very bad look.  Certainly both administrations touted the vaccine because they were handcuffed into having to believe the ‘experts’ once the other experts that were calling for caution were silenced.  
   Even if you make the argument that the vaccine was largely effective on the original strain; it was no longer effective on the ones that followed, so why still force it on folks.  Any non-expert understands that flus mutate and even the seasonal shots are guesswork at that because the previous one is no longer going to work.

So, just because other vaccines, or medicines, have been proven to have side effects but are long term worth taking does not mean every vaccine or medicine is worth taking.

There are enough examples or vaccines and medicines being withdrawn for this very reason to warrant caution—especially with a new technology altogether.