Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
@CanadaCup It sure feels bad this morning! |
HockeyNight11 | 8 |
|
![]() |
2-1 -0.36u
just have to laugh sometimes |
HockeyNight11 | 8 |
|
![]() |
2-0 early
SNF: Ravens ML -118 2u |
HockeyNight11 | 8 |
|
![]() |
Cleveland +5.5 -115 1u Teaser: Falcons +7/Cards -1 -120
GL |
HockeyNight11 | 8 |
|
![]() |
3-2 -0.3u Klein out hurt. Nothing from the O tonight. |
HockeyNight11 | 29 |
|
![]() |
Sitting out props tonight just wanna watch this game… feel like I may regret it but already have one play on the game…. Introducing 19 |
HockeyNight11 | 29 |
|
![]() |
Week 2 updated:
UConn/Cuse over 57.5 2u Baylor/SMU over 64.5 Wisconsin -28.5 Arkansas -22.5 Michigan +6.5
will likely add a prop at some point |
HockeyNight11 | 29 |
|
![]() |
@MrFreedo Wouldn’t play it this week. Heard he was in a boot earlier in the week, going to play but not sure how limited he will be. Hogan Hansen may be back as well which could further limit his snaps if not 100%. Not sure on props yet I need to dig a little more this week. |
HockeyNight11 | 29 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by MrFreedo:
I wonder what Klein’s receiving yards will be. I’m sure they raise it but haven’t seen it out yet. little birdie told me he may have gotten hurt in practice :( not sure if he is playing Saturday |
HockeyNight11 | 29 |
|
![]() |
Miss st |
sidthetallkid | 3 |
|
![]() |
@Last2thirst |
HockeyNight11 | 29 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by Bixby17:
@HockeyNight11 Great write ups. Just want to make sure I haven’t overlooked the prop bet for this week? And congrats on the 1st catch cover on week 1! No I think they learned quick lol that Klein prop was a laugher. Had a few alts as well! I am 100% convinced if you focus on a few teams you can find some player props in CFB that aren’t even close to a good line. Too many teams and the books all love to be able to say they offer the widest variety of betting options… then they make some big mistakes. The underwood UNDER rush yards was another great one last week. Was like 43.5 and there’s zero reason to run him. Think he finished at -5. |
HockeyNight11 | 29 |
|
![]() |
@DrGame Could be wrong in the end but I am not concerned. Was blown away with his command of the offense from the first snap. Again I get it was New Mexico and this is a different level against a very good defensive coach but the kid just has every tool you could ask for. I think he, today, can make the throws that only a handful of players in CFB can make. He’s that good. But I’m also not going to argue against fading a freshman QB in his first big road start. He certainly could hit a wall & have trouble with more complex defensive schemes but I’m rolling with him - 6.5 is a lot of points in what I expect to be a lower scoring game even if he’s struggling. |
HockeyNight11 | 29 |
|
![]() |
In the end, I think this is a big spot for both QB's for very different reasons. I think Michigan will be able to run the ball a little more effectively to take the pressure off. This is a team that is no stranger to a tough road environment so not overly worried there. Sherrone is an Oklahoma alum, and feel pretty good about him having this one circled for a long time. Michigan rotated 31 guys on defense in week 1 which we won't see here - Barham out for the first half is brutal but fortunately the depth is good at the position and he will be fresh for the 2H. I think the same can be said about OU defensively rotating a bunch of young guys who we probably won't see in this game so the rush yards given up to Ill St may be a bit of an outlier. I'm interested to see how Michigan handles the quick screens and RB's out of the backfield as I think Wink's defense tends to over pursue and get caught at times. Have to avoid the big plays & use the same strategy as against teams like OSU here. Keep it in front of you, make Mateer snap it a ton and drive the whole field. Bend don't break defense this week. If Bryce plays a mistake free game I think Michigan wins, but if the freshman nerves come out in Norman then this certainly swings the other way. Either way, in the trenches, I like Michigan to be able to stay within the 6.5 here. Very good numbers under the lights as a team & 4-1 ATS as an away dog and 3 outright wins in the past 5 years. Venebles at OU is 3-10 ATS in games with spreads < 7 pts.
Tight game that could go either way - i'll take the 6.5 with Michigan |
HockeyNight11 | 29 |
|
![]() |
Michigan @ Oklahoma |
HockeyNight11 | 29 |
|
![]() |
@UNIMAN They also rotated 31 defensive players which is unlikely to happen this week. |
HockeyNight11 | 29 |
|
![]() |
@buceye9
Doubtful. Seeing 5/5.5 this morning already. Would love 7’s though hope you’re right! |
HockeyNight11 | 29 |
|
![]() |
@Last2thirst Haha yeah certainly reasons to like OU! |
HockeyNight11 | 29 |
|
![]() |
wasn’t expecting to play this game, but the line move doesn’t make a lot of sense to me.
Michigan +6.5 |
HockeyNight11 | 29 |
|
![]() |
@UNIMAN Played 31 guys on defense last night |
UNIMAN | 23 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.