Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
responded to poll
Do you prefer one thread with all my picks or a new thread everyday
in MLB Betting So far, since creating the New Shannon's Double your On June 11th: Orioles Big -135 1/10 of a bankroll play 10-1 Orioles On June 12th: KC +1.5 -135 WIN 1/10 of a bankroll play 1-0 Yankees WIN |
ClaudeShannon1 | 6 |
|
![]() |
replied to
After giving you Orioles for 1/10 of your bankroll -NOW - Shannon Double Your Bankroll System daily MLB plays Part 2
in MLB Betting I'm thinking: should I continue my picks here -in this thread - or should I open a new thread every day? |
ClaudeShannon1 | 20 |
|
![]() |
replied to
After giving you Orioles for 1/10 of your bankroll -NOW - Shannon Double Your Bankroll System daily MLB plays Part 2
in MLB Betting Quote Originally Posted by ChatBIN:
Quote Originally Posted by ClaudeShannon1: KC +1.5 -135 another 1/10 of your bankroll You really did it for the second night in a row!!! Grats !!! |
ClaudeShannon1 | 20 |
|
![]() |
replied to
After giving you Orioles for 1/10 of your bankroll -NOW - Shannon Double Your Bankroll System daily MLB plays Part 2
in MLB Betting @AtlantaGambler @ChatBIN
|
ClaudeShannon1 | 20 |
|
![]() |
replied to
After giving you Orioles for 1/10 of your bankroll -NOW - Shannon Double Your Bankroll System daily MLB plays Part 2
in MLB Betting @bigred84
We will see |
ClaudeShannon1 | 20 |
|
![]() |
replied to
After giving you Orioles for 1/10 of your bankroll -NOW - Shannon Double Your Bankroll System daily MLB plays Part 2
in MLB Betting @D-Town @FelixFermin21
|
ClaudeShannon1 | 20 |
|
![]() |
created a topic
After giving you Orioles for 1/10 of your bankroll -NOW - Shannon Double Your Bankroll System daily MLB plays Part 2
in MLB Betting KC +1.5 -135 another 1/10 of your bankroll |
ClaudeShannon1 | 20 |
|
![]() |
@ChatBIN Thank you Machine |
ClaudeShannon1 | 5 |
|
![]() |
The Tigers have a 9 game lead over the Twins in their division. The Tigers won 4 out of total 6 games in this seasonal series against the Orioles. There's no record of a seasonal sweep since Covid and much before that between those two. Two more games to go. Sure winner one of them. Orioles Big -135 1/10 of a bankroll play |
ClaudeShannon1 | 5 |
|
![]() |
When I just started posting picks here - there were many factors I didn't take into a consideration. The most important one is the consistency. Some evenings I posted my plays and on others I didn't. And on posted picks here I went 7-8 with 402 money units lost (for me it is 402 USD) and including the picks I didn't post I am in a positive figures but who cares if that was not posted.
Now, I'm starting fresh. No money. No units. Just strength of the play according to my system I have developed and will post for everyone to enjoy. |
ClaudeShannon1 | 5 |
|
![]() |
These last picks ended in a 1-2 result and -625 money units So, 7-8 since I began and -402 money units. |
ClaudeShannon1 | 28 |
|
![]() |
Tonight's picks: Cubs -1.5 +120 Phillies ML -130 5 units Detroit -1.5 +125 |
ClaudeShannon1 | 28 |
|
![]() |
6-6 since I began all this with 223 money units gained |
ClaudeShannon1 | 28 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by ClaudeShannon1:
Toronto ML +116 3 units NY Yankees -1.5 -112 Cardinals ML -107 2-1 on the night winning 341 (units) |
ClaudeShannon1 | 28 |
|
![]() |
Toronto ML +116 3 units NY Yankees -1.5 -112 Cardinals ML -107 |
ClaudeShannon1 | 28 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by Mskeets: Interesting. One thing for sure -you do have a way of writing. You should devote more time to that. Write short stories and novels with methodical description of the events in a chronological order with summing up the totals. A life of a gambler - then, now and tomorrow. I'm sure it will be a bestseller. Serious
@ClaudeShannon1 Yes sir… even my bank does not understand decimal points… assuming all my learning was for not… my bank says they pay 1.08% on my savings account… then they pay .00108…. 6ish dollars on 30,000$ over 3 months… its so minuscule I pay no attention… but their printed interest payment is 1.08 ish…. That is actually one percent plus .0008…. Which would be 300 ish dollars on 30,000 in a year…. Maybe if you read the fine print they are compounding it every 10 years…. So my bank has no idea how to read decimal points…. Good luck… my suggestion is you do this for entertainment purposes only unless you are lucky… I am not lucky… I live bet Philly n oak other night in 4th inning…. Under 6.5….. it was 1-0 Philly going to the 9th…. Now those that wagered over 6.5… are lucky imo…. I am not….. I have hundreds of these … and most … and I mean most… go the way of this…. I’m no longer shocked … I just play to enjoy a very small bit of risk…. I handicap the handicappers on here… not the games anymore… and even with the best… I tend to lose… I’ll decide to add a can’t miss to one of their picks… and my can’t miss will…. The game was 1-0 going into the 9nth…. What are the odds of st least 6 runs in one inning even with the watered down pitching….. I no longer am surprised… been doing this 40 plus years… my high school girlfriend parents played with local bookie is how it started…. Of course I hit my first ever wager… for a half…50$… when you are 17… and hit for 50$ in 1982… I was set for the week… that led to me losing hundreds to 2,000 in college…. And that for me was unsustainable… and just a collasal…?… waste of time n money….and here I are today… |
ClaudeShannon1 | 28 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by ChatBIN: You and your righteous posts are so tiring...
Just a small positive input if I may please: I ran back your 9 plays and - if I am not mistaken - I see clear pattern of fading the trends that are good over 51%. Well, contrarian betting can be profitable if you also add to that an element of anti public and that usually can be only with the teams with losing records SU or ATS. And, then too - to have a steady profitable path - you will have to be extremely lucky to be winning more games than losing. That is why I use Hidden Markov model integrated with a special grade of martingale system. Now, not that I am profitable at this time but I know that over the longer sample I will be. I rarely comment in someone else's threads -but, I think that I must say what I just said. BOL CS1 |
ClaudeShannon1 | 28 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by Mskeets:
@ClaudeShannon1 How do you gain 30% on 3 wins … you gain 3 thousandths… or 1.003 units right. ? 1.0. Tenths. 1.00. Hundredths…1.003. Thousandths. You wagered 1 out of 1000…. Right. Not 1 out of 10. I’m not a mathematician… but you said you wagered 1 of 1,000… Sorry for the confusion I caused. My bad. just picks with no money relation. I am 4-5 right now -118 |
ClaudeShannon1 | 28 |
|
![]() |
Washington ML +125 Cubs ML -130 Toronto ML +100 |
ClaudeShannon1 | 28 |
|
![]() |
Lost 2 and won the last one. Both losses were +100 and the win +105. So, loss of 0.95 units. 4 wins 2 losses +212
|
ClaudeShannon1 | 28 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.