First Polls in September are The Deciding Polls

30 crucial days.

Trump needs to be within 3 points nationally, and continue his focus on the swing states and on Hillary.

He needs to be more like able , smiley, approachable, friendly.

Americans tend to like smiley and folksy types--JFK, Carter, GWBush, Bill Clinton....Obama

Trump has a sharp mind for quick decisions, and that is perfect for a company. Americans don't care for smarts (Dukakis). Trump can be sharp and also abrasive, cutting, piercing ... The rifts with other republicans has to stop. NOW.

Hillary beyond her smile and forced laugh (someone has advised her to laugh more as a memory cue for voters but she sux at it); Hillary is about as unlike able as Trump, and she is seen as more untrustworthy. This is the most vulnerable candidate on the democratic side since Dukakis. Dukakis had a double digit lead in the polls slowly erased by another tuff to like guy, who also used a pronounced Texas drawl when he had to.

Clinton is an easy target, vulnerable all over. No record to stand on. Failed record. Only platform is how unstable Donsld Trump is. This will be her only message is thru mainstream media attacks putting an abrasive Donald in bad situations. Only Nixon had a more sever austere face. Hillary has a poor nonexistent grassroots movement--noenthusiasm.

Still, the Donald loves the big stage, can handle s large crowd and does it well. They are raising money. They are facing a bad unlike able candidate. It is possible. It is not possible if the 30 days after the DNC and there is a gap of 5 points or more.

The time is gonna fly by now.

Umder 100 days. In 30 days polling improves or everything changes to a swan song. Up to a million will leave for greener pastures. Whoever wins will inherit immediate opposition and friction.

Quote Originally Posted by Relax_Dude:

30 crucial days.

Trump needs to be within 3 points nationally, and continue his focus on the swing states and on Hillary.

He needs to be more like able , smiley, approachable, friendly.

Americans tend to like smiley and folksy types--JFK, Carter, GWBush, Bill Clinton....Obama

Trump has a sharp mind for quick decisions, and that is perfect for a company. Americans don't care for smarts (Dukakis). Trump can be sharp and also abrasive, cutting, piercing ... The rifts with other republicans has to stop. NOW.

Hillary beyond her smile and forced laugh (someone has advised her to laugh more as a memory cue for voters but she sux at it); Hillary is about as unlike able as Trump, and she is seen as more untrustworthy. This is the most vulnerable candidate on the democratic side since Dukakis. Dukakis had a double digit lead in the polls slowly erased by another tuff to like guy, who also used a pronounced Texas drawl when he had to.

Clinton is an easy target, vulnerable all over. No record to stand on. Failed record. Only platform is how unstable Donsld Trump is. This will be her only message is thru mainstream media attacks putting an abrasive Donald in bad situations. Only Nixon had a more sever austere face. Hillary has a poor nonexistent grassroots movement--noenthusiasm.

Still, the Donald loves the big stage, can handle s large crowd and does it well. They are raising money. They are facing a bad unlike able candidate. It is possible. It is not possible if the 30 days after the DNC and there is a gap of 5 points or more.

The time is gonna fly by now.

Umder 100 days. In 30 days polling improves or everything changes to a swan song. Up to a million will leave for greener pastures. Whoever wins will inherit immediate opposition and friction.

Please remember (or look it up) the skill that was learned by Trump for the branding of his businesses. Most "experts" believe that sooner or later ad publicity will topple a brand. Any brand. It may be a truthdom but it can be born again. All brands come back. Trump has always taken the point of view that bad publicity is better than none. He will make remarks that are breeching public sensibilities and he knows this is true. Does this play into the hands of the Clinton campaign, whose candidate has credibility issues herself? A typical strategist will say "yes." Yet it appears rules are bring turned on their head. Trump still draws huge crowds, his followers are loyal, and his brand grows even if vilified. There is always a setback in negative branding, and it appears that the backlash is on election night. But the Trump brand after it subsides, it will have to re emerge and be stronger and solidified. McDonalds is an unhealthy meal made by teenagers, and is the most successful restAurant ever.
Building a wall to keep out Mexican rapists; banning Muslims temporarily --these are huge issues for traditional republican strategists and contrary to the outreach they've invested in for decades prior. Those who distance themselves gingerly from Trump are justified, naturally.
Yet results don't lie: the highest vote attainment for any republican nominee; and running even in critical swing states and at one point even nationally with Hillary. Revenue is surpassing expectations from private donors. It was Reibus who was most influential in ridding Lewandowski (who was extremist ) and getting a moderate and stable Pence on the ticket. Reibus is ok with the idea that Trump could alter the way republicans view immigration and trade, and to be more self interested in those areas(nativist), and abandoning immigration reform and open trade platforms--if Trump wins, these two issues will be front and center, and policies the new Republican Party endorses, part of this nativist platform.
Trump has so far overcome all challengers, and Hillary is susceptible on many levels. With a 30% chance to win the general (based on 3,300 computer analyses of possible scenarios), an even poll in September makes this number more irrelevant.

Donald will not change his spots. But the Hillary camp is notably concerned that their candidate does not have Bill Clinton folksiness, has a cackling voice, and appears non empathetic. on top of this is a huge credibility and trust issue from leftists and conservatives alike . She's a visible insider. Not good. These next 30 days are crucial. Looking good for Clinton, so far. So far.

Election is all but lost. CIA chief backs Clinton. Game over. No one can overcome that. They have chosen her. Only thing to stop her is her health, a bullet, or herself.