Posted:
#51
Over 214.5......
0
Tracking thread for 2017
Posted:
#52
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Transparency, from a poster who provides a favorable online on 12/6 that no one has access to, and the real lines loses. Now that's transparent folks!
Post 36....
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Guys I posted this 2 months ago so we all could get the best line. I know some of you weren't here for the -5.5. I can only leave -9 up to you.
Guys I posted this 2 months ago so we all could get the best line. I know some of you weren't here for the -5.5. I can only leave -9 up to you.
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=22&sub=102309645&page=1
0
8-2 2017
Posted:
#61
Quote Originally Posted by Cyrax:
Cyrax
Warriors TT Over 59.5 1H 
Warriors TT Over 114
Warriors / Grizzlies Over 110 1H
HJ Sports accountants have rendered a decision not to accept wagers of 1 TT Over in the 1h, as well as both teams Over in the 1h.
HJ Sports accountants views this as double dipping, which is not allowed 
Cyrax 2-0
More on double dipping here;
bigreds daddy
0
Posted:
#65
Quote Originally Posted by Inyourlife16:
The same place where everyone posts their NBA picks.........in the NFL forum......duh.
Ohh... Is it really an official scal pick without it's own thread? How many of the people missed out on this free play because it was embedded into 600+ posts of whining, crying and a few cold hard facts?
0
Posted:
#67
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:
Post 36....
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Guys I posted this 2 months ago so we all could get the best line. I know some of you weren't here for the -5.5. I can only leave -9 up to you.
Guys I posted this 2 months ago so we all could get the best line. I know some of you weren't here for the -5.5. I can only leave -9 up to you.
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=22&sub=102309645&page=1
LOL
Ok, now this is rich and I'd LOVE for everyone to read this.
BWS posts a line in a thread almost a MONTH later, wins, say NOTHING about the closed line which everyone lost at (-8.5) and adds a win to his record (and on top of this, the wins are weighted. The win for the wisky game with the month old line only took $100 off a $1205 loss).
I post a line almost TWO MONTHS IN ADVANCE of the NBA season, a line that didn't move for several weeks because NO ONE paid attention to it, told everyone to take it at posting and thereafter and it WINS.
And along the way, after I warned them exactly what would happen, that it would rise, and it did, and said it's up to you to deal with a different line which you were told would move.
And BWS equates THAT to his -7.5 month-old line posting on the Wisky game.
WOW. If you are seriously going to use that as an argument that and you don't think that doesn't make YOU look bad, I don't know what will.
Hugh, the Purdue bet was counted in last year's total. I clearly specified that in my thread which you are free to search for. Now you can keep it here in the Penalty Box with your falsified record keeping, like other trolls, and that is up to you.
I am 1-2 with picks this year and 0-1 on a team total I made over a half a year ago. Keep tallying them up in an attempt to make me look bad. I welcome it. Your time here is being well spent.
0
Posted:
#68
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:
Ohh... Is it really an official scal pick without it's own thread? How many of the people missed out on this free play because it was embedded into 600+ posts of whining, crying and a few cold hard facts?
Now it needs 'it's own thread' for it to be a pick.
But of course, if it didn't hit, he would be THE FIRST PERSON posting it as a loss.
Not a lot of people missed it BWS. The thread only has a mere 25+K views.
0
Posted:
#70
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
LOL
Ok, now this is rich and I'd LOVE for everyone to read this.
BWS posts a line in a thread almost a MONTH later, wins, say NOTHING about the closed line which everyone lost at (-8.5) and adds a win to his record (and on top of this, the wins are weighted. The win for the wisky game with the month old line only took $100 off a $1205 loss).
I post a line almost TWO MONTHS IN ADVANCE of the NBA season, a line that didn't move for several weeks because NO ONE paid attention to it, told everyone to take it at posting and thereafter and it WINS.
And along the way, after I warned them exactly what would happen, that it would rise, and it did, and said it's up to you to deal with a different line which you were told would move.
And BWS equates THAT to his -7.5 month-old line posting on the Wisky game.
WOW. If you are seriously going to use that as an argument that and you don't think that doesn't make YOU look bad, I don't know what will.
Hugh, the Purdue bet was counted in last year's total. I clearly specified that in my thread which you are free to search for. Now you can keep it here in the Penalty Box with your falsified record keeping, like other trolls, and that is up to you.
I am 1-2 with picks this year and 0-1 on a team total I made over a half a year ago. Keep tallying them up in an attempt to make me look bad. I welcome it. Your time here is being well spent.
Big difference here (I knew I would have to explain it to you) is that my early lines were posted and WERE AVAILABLE TO ANYONE AT THAT TIME on 12/6 for people to play....
Your line didn't move for weeks.... Want to know why? Not because no one paid attention to it like he wants you to believe.... It's because it was barely available in any books other than the one that scal used....It wasn't even posted on scoresandodds until 10/24
Now reread scal's thread... People could NOT access the line that he had. Your argument (as usual) makes little sense and is a waste of everyone's time. Your hypocrisy on the other hand (as usual) shines brighter with every post.
0
Posted:
#71
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Now it needs 'it's own thread' for it to be a pick.
But of course, if it didn't hit, he would be THE FIRST PERSON posting it as a loss.
Not a lot of people missed it BWS. The thread only has a mere 25+K views.
But if 24,000 of the views are you rereading your own meltdown does it really help the people? Did it really help the people that were looking for a basketball play last night? It's all about the people right? For free, remember 
0
Posted:
#73
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Now it needs 'it's own thread' for it to be a pick.
But of course, if it didn't hit, he would be THE FIRST PERSON posting it as a loss.
Not a lot of people missed it BWS. The thread only has a mere 25+K views.
Very astute move by you.... if it loses, barely any would have noticed because nobody was going into that thread to see a pick. And once again, if it lost you were taking your ball and going home. Since it won, you go ahead and claim that you 'shut them up after 599 posts' even though it was a 'A miracle if it happens. This stupid fu**s'.
If I may I'd like to steal a quote from you....
"Ya can't make it up folks!"
0
Hot Forum Topics
Established in 1995,Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Covers is verified safe by:
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.