Scal is a pompous, whiny douche with a wining % in posted plays.
But you suffer from pathologic, obsessive-compulsive cyber stalking. That, added to your hypocrisy, your nauseating world view, your arrogant narrow mindedness makes you the nr 1 troll on this site for me. The leash they got you on is not short enough.
CPL XIX Winner. Punter. Scotch lover. Big Man.
0
Scal is a pompous, whiny douche with a wining % in posted plays.
But you suffer from pathologic, obsessive-compulsive cyber stalking. That, added to your hypocrisy, your nauseating world view, your arrogant narrow mindedness makes you the nr 1 troll on this site for me. The leash they got you on is not short enough.
I am expecting BIG things from Covers only 70% capper.
You might ask ... "why is that, Hugh"
My response is, don't ask me, just ask scal himself ...
"For those who have lost with my picks, you will be paid back. I will personally play picks as usual and return when the time is right, and simply pick fewer games. I'm on too many games. That is for certain. You'll have winners back and we will settle for nothing less than 65% and my goal is 70% over smaller sample sizes"
bigreds daddy
0
I am expecting BIG things from Covers only 70% capper.
You might ask ... "why is that, Hugh"
My response is, don't ask me, just ask scal himself ...
"For those who have lost with my picks, you will be paid back. I will personally play picks as usual and return when the time is right, and simply pick fewer games. I'm on too many games. That is for certain. You'll have winners back and we will settle for nothing less than 65% and my goal is 70% over smaller sample sizes"
Scal is a pompous, whiny douche with a wining % in posted plays.
But you suffer from pathologic, obsessive-compulsive cyber stalking. That, added to your hypocrisy, your nauseating world view, your arrogant narrow mindedness makes you the nr 1 troll on this site for me. The leash they got you on is not short enough.
Ganda, Hugh now has a job here, let's let him do it.
No bashing in this thread... The link to this thread will be placed in each of his pick threads so people can have an honest look at exactly what they are tailing.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ganda:
Scal is a pompous, whiny douche with a wining % in posted plays.
But you suffer from pathologic, obsessive-compulsive cyber stalking. That, added to your hypocrisy, your nauseating world view, your arrogant narrow mindedness makes you the nr 1 troll on this site for me. The leash they got you on is not short enough.
Ganda, Hugh now has a job here, let's let him do it.
No bashing in this thread... The link to this thread will be placed in each of his pick threads so people can have an honest look at exactly what they are tailing.
Never thought you'd be part of hugh's bullying clique BWS, thought you were your own man. His obsession with Scal is pathetic and creepy. You know what hugh is all about. Weird to see you on that side.
CPL XIX Winner. Punter. Scotch lover. Big Man.
0
Never thought you'd be part of hugh's bullying clique BWS, thought you were your own man. His obsession with Scal is pathetic and creepy. You know what hugh is all about. Weird to see you on that side.
No bashing in this thread... The link to this thread will be placed in each of his pick threads so people can have an honest look at exactly what they are tailing.
Oh, this is excellent!
0
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:
No bashing in this thread... The link to this thread will be placed in each of his pick threads so people can have an honest look at exactly what they are tailing.
Never thought you'd be part of hugh's bullying clique BWS, thought you were your own man. His obsession with Scal is pathetic and creepy. You know what hugh is all about. Weird to see you on that side.
Hugh and I haven't seen eye to eye on many things. Not bullying or ganging up, just keeping things straight and easy to find. Lots of history here Ganda.....scal brings it on himself with personal attacks going back for years.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ganda:
Never thought you'd be part of hugh's bullying clique BWS, thought you were your own man. His obsession with Scal is pathetic and creepy. You know what hugh is all about. Weird to see you on that side.
Hugh and I haven't seen eye to eye on many things. Not bullying or ganging up, just keeping things straight and easy to find. Lots of history here Ganda.....scal brings it on himself with personal attacks going back for years.
If you say so. Can't say I've followed it all, but don't think scal cheats with his record, so what's the point? Anyway, all I see from hugh is negativity, hate mongering, instigating, bullying, putting people down, twisting and turning every fact and event to fit a vile ideological world view etc...
I'll leave you guys to it. Can't wait till Covers flip the switch on him.
CPL XIX Winner. Punter. Scotch lover. Big Man.
0
If you say so. Can't say I've followed it all, but don't think scal cheats with his record, so what's the point? Anyway, all I see from hugh is negativity, hate mongering, instigating, bullying, putting people down, twisting and turning every fact and event to fit a vile ideological world view etc...
I'll leave you guys to it. Can't wait till Covers flip the switch on him.
Never thought you'd be part of hugh's bullying clique BWS, thought you were your own man. His obsession with Scal is pathetic and creepy. You know what hugh is all about. Weird to see you on that side.
Gandi, I will make a rare exception here, and address you in a thread which is outside of your very own thread here in the PB.
I find the term "clique" to be passé.
I like to think of me and my gang to be more of a posse.
Please refer to us as a posse going forward.
That is all
bigreds daddy
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ganda:
Never thought you'd be part of hugh's bullying clique BWS, thought you were your own man. His obsession with Scal is pathetic and creepy. You know what hugh is all about. Weird to see you on that side.
Gandi, I will make a rare exception here, and address you in a thread which is outside of your very own thread here in the PB.
I find the term "clique" to be passé.
I like to think of me and my gang to be more of a posse.
Rare exception #2 in posting to Gandhi outside of his own thread (Gandhi, you should feel privileged that you finally have my attention. Lord knows you beg for it often enough)
On the internet, we all have the option to ignore someone, anyone, or everyone.
Unless, of course, that someone is dancing inside your head every waking minute, as well as half the sleeping ones.
In this event, one simply cannot ignore another, as they become consumed with them, impatiently waiting for their next post.
This is referred to as "being inside your head"
So Gandhi, as I dance around inside your noggin, do you approve of my rhythm?
Do me a favor, put on some latin music, I feel like doing the Salsa!
Olé
bigreds daddy
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ganda:
Can't wait till Covers flip the switch on him.
Rare exception #2 in posting to Gandhi outside of his own thread (Gandhi, you should feel privileged that you finally have my attention. Lord knows you beg for it often enough)
On the internet, we all have the option to ignore someone, anyone, or everyone.
Unless, of course, that someone is dancing inside your head every waking minute, as well as half the sleeping ones.
In this event, one simply cannot ignore another, as they become consumed with them, impatiently waiting for their next post.
This is referred to as "being inside your head"
So Gandhi, as I dance around inside your noggin, do you approve of my rhythm?
Do me a favor, put on some latin music, I feel like doing the Salsa!
If you say so. Can't say I've followed it all, but don't think scal cheats with his record, so what's the point? Anyway, all I see from hugh is negativity, hate mongering, instigating, bullying, putting people down, twisting and turning every fact and event to fit a vile ideological world view etc...
I'll leave you guys to it. Can't wait till Covers flip the switch on him.
Short version... scal was 4-5-1 in NFL for the 2016 season, yet he posts a record of 36-23 (or whatever he ended up) on his picks. Someone who stumbles upon an NFL play of his should know that he is not a 65-70% NFL capper this season. When asked, he refuses to post a record by sport. You wouldn't want to hire a painter to change out a toilet for you, so why would someone want to tail a guy in a sport that he is obviously not as strong in this year? Transparency is the goal of this
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ganda:
If you say so. Can't say I've followed it all, but don't think scal cheats with his record, so what's the point? Anyway, all I see from hugh is negativity, hate mongering, instigating, bullying, putting people down, twisting and turning every fact and event to fit a vile ideological world view etc...
I'll leave you guys to it. Can't wait till Covers flip the switch on him.
Short version... scal was 4-5-1 in NFL for the 2016 season, yet he posts a record of 36-23 (or whatever he ended up) on his picks. Someone who stumbles upon an NFL play of his should know that he is not a 65-70% NFL capper this season. When asked, he refuses to post a record by sport. You wouldn't want to hire a painter to change out a toilet for you, so why would someone want to tail a guy in a sport that he is obviously not as strong in this year? Transparency is the goal of this
Short version... scal was 4-5-1 in NFL for the 2016 season, yet he posts a record of 36-23 (or whatever he ended up) on his picks. Someone who stumbles upon an NFL play of his should know that he is not a 65-70% NFL capper this season. When asked, he refuses to post a record by sport. You wouldn't want to hire a painter to change out a toilet for you, so why would someone want to tail a guy in a sport that he is obviously not as strong in this year? Transparency is the goal of this
Why do you worry about someone else keeping a 100% posted record when you don't once you start losing?
HOCKEY........?
MMA.......?
I'll you on this one......
HOOPS......3-12
You shouldn't throw stones.
Oh.......Don't forget to bump up ONLY my losing threads from years ago....Not the winning ones. Either way it doesn't help your case.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:
Short version... scal was 4-5-1 in NFL for the 2016 season, yet he posts a record of 36-23 (or whatever he ended up) on his picks. Someone who stumbles upon an NFL play of his should know that he is not a 65-70% NFL capper this season. When asked, he refuses to post a record by sport. You wouldn't want to hire a painter to change out a toilet for you, so why would someone want to tail a guy in a sport that he is obviously not as strong in this year? Transparency is the goal of this
Why do you worry about someone else keeping a 100% posted record when you don't once you start losing?
HOCKEY........?
MMA.......?
I'll you on this one......
HOOPS......3-12
You shouldn't throw stones.
Oh.......Don't forget to bump up ONLY my losing threads from years ago....Not the winning ones. Either way it doesn't help your case.
Short version... scal was 4-5-1 in NFL for the 2016 season, yet he posts a record of 36-23 (or whatever he ended up) on his picks. Someone who stumbles upon an NFL play of his should know that he is not a 65-70% NFL capper this season. When asked, he refuses to post a record by sport. You wouldn't want to hire a painter to change out a toilet for you, so why would someone want to tail a guy in a sport that he is obviously not as strong in this year? Transparency is the goal of this
Why would I post a record by sport when it was you the trolls who demanded I provide a record as an overall capper after relentlessly harassing me as a 50% capper overall???
Then when that hits the roof because it is so good you want to go back to individual sport.
TRANSPARENCY IS THE MAIN REASON I PROVIDED AN OVERALL RECORD
Transparency, from a poster who provides a favorable online on 12/6 that no one has access to, and the real lines loses. Now that's transparent folks!
0
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:
Short version... scal was 4-5-1 in NFL for the 2016 season, yet he posts a record of 36-23 (or whatever he ended up) on his picks. Someone who stumbles upon an NFL play of his should know that he is not a 65-70% NFL capper this season. When asked, he refuses to post a record by sport. You wouldn't want to hire a painter to change out a toilet for you, so why would someone want to tail a guy in a sport that he is obviously not as strong in this year? Transparency is the goal of this
Why would I post a record by sport when it was you the trolls who demanded I provide a record as an overall capper after relentlessly harassing me as a 50% capper overall???
Then when that hits the roof because it is so good you want to go back to individual sport.
TRANSPARENCY IS THE MAIN REASON I PROVIDED AN OVERALL RECORD
Transparency, from a poster who provides a favorable online on 12/6 that no one has access to, and the real lines loses. Now that's transparent folks!
If you say so. Can't say I've followed it all, but don't think scal cheats with his record, so what's the point? Anyway, all I see from hugh is negativity, hate mongering, instigating, bullying, putting people down, twisting and turning every fact and event to fit a vile ideological world view etc...
I'll leave you guys to it. Can't wait till Covers flip the switch on him.
Regarding the bolded. It's been proven fact he inflated his record in 2016. Included a hot dog eating contest, but didn't include his play of the year on Hillary, amongst others
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ganda:
If you say so. Can't say I've followed it all, but don't think scal cheats with his record, so what's the point? Anyway, all I see from hugh is negativity, hate mongering, instigating, bullying, putting people down, twisting and turning every fact and event to fit a vile ideological world view etc...
I'll leave you guys to it. Can't wait till Covers flip the switch on him.
Regarding the bolded. It's been proven fact he inflated his record in 2016. Included a hot dog eating contest, but didn't include his play of the year on Hillary, amongst others
Why would I post a record by sport when it was you the trolls who demanded I provide a record as an overall capper after relentlessly harassing me as a 50% capper overall???
Then when that hits the roof because it is so good you want to go back to individual sport.
TRANSPARENCY IS THE MAIN REASON I PROVIDED AN OVERALL RECORD
Transparency, from a poster who provides a favorable online on 12/6 that no one has access to, and the real lines loses. Now that's transparent folks!
Everyone had access to line when it came out. That line was there from 12/4 to 12/29 and was posted on 12/6. When you're worried about writing short stories about battleships I'm out getting a great line and posting it.
Why would I post a record by sport when it was you the trolls who demanded I provide a record as an overall capper after relentlessly harassing me as a 50% capper overall???
Then when that hits the roof because it is so good you want to go back to individual sport.
TRANSPARENCY IS THE MAIN REASON I PROVIDED AN OVERALL RECORD
Transparency, from a poster who provides a favorable online on 12/6 that no one has access to, and the real lines loses. Now that's transparent folks!
Everyone had access to line when it came out. That line was there from 12/4 to 12/29 and was posted on 12/6. When you're worried about writing short stories about battleships I'm out getting a great line and posting it.