32-27 Why not? Surprised so many people like the southermost Carolinians, but I say they crash and burn like Xavier did yesterday. UF -3
I'd like to play against the steam on the UNC/UK total, playing under the bloated number, but I'm afraid. Let's assume I grow some nuts and man up. UNC/UK Under 160.5
0
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:
Only because I like you guys
Gators -3
32-27 Why not? Surprised so many people like the southermost Carolinians, but I say they crash and burn like Xavier did yesterday. UF -3
I'd like to play against the steam on the UNC/UK total, playing under the bloated number, but I'm afraid. Let's assume I grow some nuts and man up. UNC/UK Under 160.5
I just can't get enough of this CBI action. We could see 3 straight games between Wyoming and Coastal Carolina.
Let's assume that these 2 offense first teams are going to have some fun tonite. WY/CC Over 153.
“It does make the game quicker. There are not as many foul shots and fans kind of like that,” Ellis said. “There’s a lot more basketball with this rule because you’re having to bring the ball in and play basketball as opposed to going to the free throw line and shooting free throws.”
Read more here: https://www.myrtlebeachonline.com/sports/college/sun-belt/coastal-carolina-university/article140781658.html#storylink=cpy
0
33-28
I just can't get enough of this CBI action. We could see 3 straight games between Wyoming and Coastal Carolina.
Let's assume that these 2 offense first teams are going to have some fun tonite. WY/CC Over 153.
“It does make the game quicker. There are not as many foul shots and fans kind of like that,” Ellis said. “There’s a lot more basketball with this rule because you’re having to bring the ball in and play basketball as opposed to going to the free throw line and shooting free throws.”
Read more here: https://www.myrtlebeachonline.com/sports/college/sun-belt/coastal-carolina-university/article140781658.html#storylink=cpy
Of course this is mainly a fade of Scalabrine and the rest of the pseudo sharps in the NCAAB forum. TCU Coach Jamie Dixon is a regular to this Madison Square Garden atmosphere after coaching Pitt here so many times. This is culture shock for the poor UCF kids who had very low expectations this year. I think they flat out choke in the moment.
0
34-28
TCU -2.5
Of course this is mainly a fade of Scalabrine and the rest of the pseudo sharps in the NCAAB forum. TCU Coach Jamie Dixon is a regular to this Madison Square Garden atmosphere after coaching Pitt here so many times. This is culture shock for the poor UCF kids who had very low expectations this year. I think they flat out choke in the moment.
35-28 So after the 2 teams combine for 172 points in game 1, they open the total 2 points higher and the people have bet it up a bit more. Problem is, we have a starting PG on CC who is out and a scoring F who is questionable. Wyoming also has a starting F who is doubtful. What does a coach do when his lineups get shuffled in an important game? Preach defense. After all, scoring is talent but defense is effort.Bring on the effort scrubs, if you please. WY/CC Under 156.5
0
35-28 So after the 2 teams combine for 172 points in game 1, they open the total 2 points higher and the people have bet it up a bit more. Problem is, we have a starting PG on CC who is out and a scoring F who is questionable. Wyoming also has a starting F who is doubtful. What does a coach do when his lineups get shuffled in an important game? Preach defense. After all, scoring is talent but defense is effort.Bring on the effort scrubs, if you please. WY/CC Under 156.5
36-28 Both GT and TCU entered the NIT slumping and both have come out balling so far. So I'm interested in how the numbers look over the last 4 games within the NIT. Let me tell you, based on just those, it's surprising that Tech isn't the 4 point favorite. Let's play the logical angle :
GA TECH +4
0
36-28 Both GT and TCU entered the NIT slumping and both have come out balling so far. So I'm interested in how the numbers look over the last 4 games within the NIT. Let me tell you, based on just those, it's surprising that Tech isn't the 4 point favorite. Let's play the logical angle :
Coastal Carolina’s shooting percentage of 31.3 was the worst by a Wyoming opponent this calendar year, and its 3-point percentage of 19.2 was the second-worst performance against Wyoming all season.
36-29 I'm going to take a shot at backing CC here with the 8 points. I've been to the Rockies and it does take a few days to get used to it. I think they'll be much better tonite. Interestingly enough last game, CC had 9 steals and created 13 turnovers. They only turned it over 9 times themselves. That's a positive sign in a game which you got beat badly in. If the shots start dropping, this will be a close one.
CC +8
0
Coastal Carolina’s shooting percentage of 31.3 was the worst by a Wyoming opponent this calendar year, and its 3-point percentage of 19.2 was the second-worst performance against Wyoming all season.
36-29 I'm going to take a shot at backing CC here with the 8 points. I've been to the Rockies and it does take a few days to get used to it. I think they'll be much better tonite. Interestingly enough last game, CC had 9 steals and created 13 turnovers. They only turned it over 9 times themselves. That's a positive sign in a game which you got beat badly in. If the shots start dropping, this will be a close one.
36-30 Gonzo has held all of their opponents well below their usual shot%. SoCar has exceeded their shot % by more than 5% in the tourney. But they haven't played a defense like Gonzaga yet. When the shots stop falling for SoCar, they'll be in big trouble. Nevertheless, I've been so impressed with their energy level. They have a top 5 perimeter defense and rarely let a shot go uncontested. The proper answer is:
Gonzo/SoCar Under 138
0
36-30 Gonzo has held all of their opponents well below their usual shot%. SoCar has exceeded their shot % by more than 5% in the tourney. But they haven't played a defense like Gonzaga yet. When the shots stop falling for SoCar, they'll be in big trouble. Nevertheless, I've been so impressed with their energy level. They have a top 5 perimeter defense and rarely let a shot go uncontested. The proper answer is:
36-30 Gonzo has held all of their opponents well below their usual shot%. SoCar has exceeded their shot % by more than 5% in the tourney. But they haven't played a defense like Gonzaga yet. When the shots stop falling for SoCar, they'll be in big trouble. Nevertheless, I've been so impressed with their energy level. They have a top 5 perimeter defense and rarely let a shot go uncontested. The proper answer is:
Gonzo/SoCar Under 138
I have never bet a basketball teaser in my life ... but if I were to ...
Zonga -2.5
Under 141
bigreds daddy
0
Quote Originally Posted by Getty3:
36-30 Gonzo has held all of their opponents well below their usual shot%. SoCar has exceeded their shot % by more than 5% in the tourney. But they haven't played a defense like Gonzaga yet. When the shots stop falling for SoCar, they'll be in big trouble. Nevertheless, I've been so impressed with their energy level. They have a top 5 perimeter defense and rarely let a shot go uncontested. The proper answer is:
Gonzo/SoCar Under 138
I have never bet a basketball teaser in my life ... but if I were to ...