Me: you like little kids and here is the proof.
You: No, you like little kids.
Nice comeback, pederast.

Me: you like little kids and here is the proof.
You: No, you like little kids.
Nice comeback, pederast.
Me: you like little kids and here is the proof.
You: No, you like little kids.
Nice comeback, pederast.
In post #61 you said you wanted to “take a room” with my cousin.
In post #67 you admitted you remembered the thread a few weeks ago in which I talked about my 8 year old cousin going hunting.
The evidence is right there that you, at the very least, have a desire to molest little children.
You must be just hating the “no-edit” feature right about now.
In post #61 you said you wanted to “take a room” with my cousin.
In post #67 you admitted you remembered the thread a few weeks ago in which I talked about my 8 year old cousin going hunting.
The evidence is right there that you, at the very least, have a desire to molest little children.
You must be just hating the “no-edit” feature right about now.
In post #61 you said you wanted to “take a room” with my cousin.
In post #67 you admitted you remembered the thread a few weeks ago in which I talked about my 8 year old cousin going hunting.
The evidence is right there that you, at the very least, have a desire to molest little children.
You must be just hating the “no-edit” feature right about now.
In post #61 you said you wanted to “take a room” with my cousin.
In post #67 you admitted you remembered the thread a few weeks ago in which I talked about my 8 year old cousin going hunting.
The evidence is right there that you, at the very least, have a desire to molest little children.
You must be just hating the “no-edit” feature right about now.
In post #61 you said you wanted to “take a room” with my cousin.
In post #67 you admitted you remembered the thread a few weeks ago in which I talked about my 8 year old cousin going hunting.
The evidence is right there that you, at the very least, have a desire to molest little children.
You must be just hating the “no-edit” feature right about now.
In post #61 you said you wanted to “take a room” with my cousin.
In post #67 you admitted you remembered the thread a few weeks ago in which I talked about my 8 year old cousin going hunting.
The evidence is right there that you, at the very least, have a desire to molest little children.
You must be just hating the “no-edit” feature right about now.
That’s your excuse for what you said? “Do you know how to read”?
That’s your excuse for what you said? “Do you know how to read”?
Feel free point out where in post #64 I said anything about my 8 year old cousin going hunting.
Feel free point out where in post #64 I said anything about my 8 year old cousin going hunting.
Not much going on here. Little ricky is just making a complete ass of himself again. It’s becoming quite the common occurrence.
Not much going on here. Little ricky is just making a complete ass of himself again. It’s becoming quite the common occurrence.
Feel free point out where in post #64 I said anything about my 8 year old cousin going hunting.
Feel free point out where in post #64 I said anything about my 8 year old cousin going hunting.
You are either an incredibly stupid pedophile or you are a pedophile that is playing dumb. Either way I will try and explain this as simply as I possibly can seeing as how it’s becoming blindingly obvious you are about as sharp as a bowling ball.
In post #64 I said she was 8 years old, but at no point in this thread did I mention she went hunting.
In post #67 you admitted you remembered the thread a few weeks ago in which I talked about my 8 year old cousin going hunting; thus you knew full well she was 8 years old and you expressed your desire to “take a room” with her anyway.
Your posts will always be there for everyone to see that you are a sick fuck that, at the very least, wants to molest little children.
Aww, no edit feature for the pederast rickem.
You are either an incredibly stupid pedophile or you are a pedophile that is playing dumb. Either way I will try and explain this as simply as I possibly can seeing as how it’s becoming blindingly obvious you are about as sharp as a bowling ball.
In post #64 I said she was 8 years old, but at no point in this thread did I mention she went hunting.
In post #67 you admitted you remembered the thread a few weeks ago in which I talked about my 8 year old cousin going hunting; thus you knew full well she was 8 years old and you expressed your desire to “take a room” with her anyway.
Your posts will always be there for everyone to see that you are a sick fuck that, at the very least, wants to molest little children.
Aww, no edit feature for the pederast rickem.
You are either an incredibly stupid pedophile or you are a pedophile that is playing dumb. Either way I will try and explain this as simply as I possibly can seeing as how it’s becoming blindingly obvious you are about as sharp as a bowling ball.
In post #64 I said she was 8 years old, but at no point in this thread did I mention she went hunting.
In post #67 you admitted you remembered the thread a few weeks ago in which I talked about my 8 year old cousin going hunting; thus you knew full well she was 8 years old and you expressed your desire to “take a room” with her anyway.
Your posts will always be there for everyone to see that you are a sick fuck that, at the very least, wants to molest little children.
Aww, no edit feature for the pederast rickem.
You are either an incredibly stupid pedophile or you are a pedophile that is playing dumb. Either way I will try and explain this as simply as I possibly can seeing as how it’s becoming blindingly obvious you are about as sharp as a bowling ball.
In post #64 I said she was 8 years old, but at no point in this thread did I mention she went hunting.
In post #67 you admitted you remembered the thread a few weeks ago in which I talked about my 8 year old cousin going hunting; thus you knew full well she was 8 years old and you expressed your desire to “take a room” with her anyway.
Your posts will always be there for everyone to see that you are a sick fuck that, at the very least, wants to molest little children.
Aww, no edit feature for the pederast rickem.
The only time I said she went hunting was in the same SENTENCE I said she was also 8 years old. So you remembered that she went hunting, but it completely slipped your mind the part about her being a small child?
You knew she was 8 years old and you still said you wanted to “take a room” with her.
You can play dumb as much you like, but the proof that you have a desire to molest children is right there for everyone to see and you can’t do a damn thing about it.
Deal with it you sick fuck.
The only time I said she went hunting was in the same SENTENCE I said she was also 8 years old. So you remembered that she went hunting, but it completely slipped your mind the part about her being a small child?
You knew she was 8 years old and you still said you wanted to “take a room” with her.
You can play dumb as much you like, but the proof that you have a desire to molest children is right there for everyone to see and you can’t do a damn thing about it.
Deal with it you sick fuck.
Being considered weird is a compliment for this place.
It’s when you start blending in you need to worry.
Being considered weird is a compliment for this place.
It’s when you start blending in you need to worry.
Oh look, it’s the kid that became infuriated when I made a Deliverance reference in the thread about his place in Georgia.
Must have hit a little too close to home.
Oh look, it’s the kid that became infuriated when I made a Deliverance reference in the thread about his place in Georgia.
Must have hit a little too close to home.
It looks like it finally dawned on RickeM that he let it slip that he is a pederast and the sick bastard decided to give it a rest before he made an even bigger ass of himself.
It looks like it finally dawned on RickeM that he let it slip that he is a pederast and the sick bastard decided to give it a rest before he made an even bigger ass of himself.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.