Posted:
#101
Delaware Race 8
Predicted Order Of finish
#9 Forest diva
#8 poppys Double
#3 Frans Image
#4 Breezy Girl
GL 
0
Parx Delaware Presque Isle 7/14
Posted:
#102
Quote Originally Posted by jennifer666:
Lets be VERY CLEAR you are ASSessing them against a betting "system" that you use, dont blame that moronic method on me. Thats my problem with your ASSessment. Its flawed and the apple doesnt fall far from the tree. lots of luck!
Lets be VERY CLEAR you are ASSessing them against a betting "system" that you use, dont blame that moronic method on me. Thats my problem with your ASSessment. Its flawed and the apple doesnt fall far from the tree. lots of luck!
No, lets be crystal clear. I am assessing them against a plausible system that you created. You created it by picking 4 horses in an an order of finish and then bragging about every combination of exacta you happen to fall into; making it a must to consider every exacta combination in every race if you are going to assess your OVERALL ROI. I'm not betting any of this. I am tracking your picks for their quality. So far you are not fairing well e.i., a better here tailing you would be losing. Either losing because they have to play every combination or losing because they is a very slim chance they would be precisely on the exactas you claim as winners because the sheer number of plays they would have to have to make sure they got that one in would cancel out any temporary windfall.
Basically, anyone here can come in and pick in 4 horses in an order (as long as they are racing) and fall into some big exacta payouts.
0
Posted:
#104
Quote Originally Posted by jennifer666:
Officially stuck AND still generating more interest then ANY of those fcktards in the Horse forum. So melt your tongue on my azzhole sht stain. Thanks!
Officially stuck AND still generating more interest then ANY of those fcktards in the Horse forum. So melt your tongue on my azzhole sht stain. Thanks!
nice teeth.
All the rebarbative comments and pejorative remarks aren't deflecting any focus from the real crux of this thread; your picks and their ROI.
0
Posted:
#107
Quote Originally Posted by jennifer666:
" So far you are not fairing well"
" So far you are not fairing well"
Then why bother looking?
Crickets....
Crickets......
As stated. Assessing your overall body of work over a period of time to see a true ROI potential. I am rooting for you to win.
As a side bonus, keeping you honest is good for the forum. It isn't good to have betters coming into a thread and being disillutioned by cheering claims of big wins without being shown the whole story.
0
Posted:
#108
You are so fckng simple it really is remarkable. EVERY TRACK ANALYST IN THE COUNTRY. Lists their top 4 picks. We have been through this time and time again. For some reason the aliases that lurk here try to discredit me because they HATE and try to project their anger and failures at others. Pretty easy dip sht!
0
Posted:
#109
Quote Originally Posted by jennifer666:
You are so fckng simple it really is remarkable. EVERY TRACK ANALYST IN THE COUNTRY. Lists their top 4 picks. We have been through this time and time again. For some reason the aliases that lurk here try to discredit me because they HATE and try to project their anger and failures at others. Pretty easy dip sht!
You are so fckng simple it really is remarkable. EVERY TRACK ANALYST IN THE COUNTRY. Lists their top 4 picks. We have been through this time and time again. For some reason the aliases that lurk here try to discredit me because they HATE and try to project their anger and failures at others. Pretty easy dip sht!
And if you stopped at posting 4 picks in order and letting that star for itself it would be as bad. The fact that you openly brag about any exacta that lands on any 4 horses makes it imperative to bet all your exacta combinations in order to realize that hit with you. You're being obtuse.
Track analysts don't claim victories and every combination of win based on their 4 horses.
0
Posted:
#112
Quote Originally Posted by jennifer666:
I get 10 times more looks then those alias morons and it infuriates them for some reason. probably because my picks consistently bury them. I stand by my picks. If want to use them I welcome it. If not dont. However when Im attacked I will defend my self strongly. Good luck!
I get 10 times more looks then those alias morons and it infuriates them for some reason. probably because my picks consistently bury them. I stand by my picks. If want to use them I welcome it. If not dont. However when Im attacked I will defend my self strongly. Good luck!
You certainly defend yourself strongly, just not intelligently. Chin up, you're halfway there.
0
Posted:
#125
Quote Originally Posted by Rodeo360:
No, lets be crystal clear. I am assessing them against a plausible system that you created. You created it by picking 4 horses in an an order of finish and then bragging about every combination of exacta you happen to fall into; making it a must to consider every exacta combination in every race if you are going to assess your OVERALL ROI. I'm not betting any of this. I am tracking your picks for their quality. So far you are not fairing well e.i., a better here tailing you would be losing. Either losing because they have to play every combination or losing because they is a very slim chance they would be precisely on the exactas you claim as winners because the sheer number of plays they would have to have to make sure they got that one in would cancel out any temporary windfall.
Basically, anyone here can come in and pick in 4 horses in an order (as long as they are racing) and fall into some big exacta payouts.
Rodeo, once again thanks for the excellent job you're doing.
0
Hot Forum Topics
