LSU/Miami Under 48. The total has gone up over 2 points but I ask "Where do the points come from?" Both teams are better and more experienced on the other side of the ball.
0
LSU/Miami Under 48. The total has gone up over 2 points but I ask "Where do the points come from?" Both teams are better and more experienced on the other side of the ball.
New Mexico St, Colorado St, Temple, Kansas State are on autofade? KState, not yet. The others look bad
Hawaii is a sleeper offense worth backing? For the next 4 games, yes
Central Florida is offensively potent yet again? Should be little to no drop off
Wisconsin and Unders will be a thing? Remember they had their 2 top WR's suspended for game 1
Baylor, Michigan State has no D? Baylor never has... MSU will be fine
Chip Kelly sucks? No, but his team does. The transition will be rough this year.
Penn State will have trouble stopping teams? Lost 7 of their top 8 tacklers and only 3 returning starters on D. They have time to fix before OSU at the end of the month, and Pitt is the only team that could push them in that stretch
Michigan and Notre Dame both have elite D but very little O? Making Wimbush look good does not qualify as elite, Patterson struggled against the good SEC defenses. Harbaugh still has zero identity on offense
Florida Gators could be a sleeper team this year? SHOULD win next 3 before going to Miss St. Won't know until they play that game
0
Quote Originally Posted by packersbackers:
So what did we learn this week?
New Mexico St, Colorado St, Temple, Kansas State are on autofade? KState, not yet. The others look bad
Hawaii is a sleeper offense worth backing? For the next 4 games, yes
Central Florida is offensively potent yet again? Should be little to no drop off
Wisconsin and Unders will be a thing? Remember they had their 2 top WR's suspended for game 1
Baylor, Michigan State has no D? Baylor never has... MSU will be fine
Chip Kelly sucks? No, but his team does. The transition will be rough this year.
Penn State will have trouble stopping teams? Lost 7 of their top 8 tacklers and only 3 returning starters on D. They have time to fix before OSU at the end of the month, and Pitt is the only team that could push them in that stretch
Michigan and Notre Dame both have elite D but very little O? Making Wimbush look good does not qualify as elite, Patterson struggled against the good SEC defenses. Harbaugh still has zero identity on offense
Florida Gators could be a sleeper team this year? SHOULD win next 3 before going to Miss St. Won't know until they play that game
Grabbed 7.5 in the mains for full game. Gonna lock in 7 for 2H. FSU looks confused, lost, intimidated. Tech D looking great. I don’t see this new couch making the necessary adjustments. And even if they can offensively, their backfield is getting torn apart on d
No team is as good as it looks when winning nor are they as bad as they look when losing
0
Grabbed 7.5 in the mains for full game. Gonna lock in 7 for 2H. FSU looks confused, lost, intimidated. Tech D looking great. I don’t see this new couch making the necessary adjustments. And even if they can offensively, their backfield is getting torn apart on d
Not a deign play at all. A smart play that is well worth moneylining.
This ECU team under Montgomery is in lockstep with Hazel's Purdue teams in terms of incompetence. At this point I'd only be confident in them laying double digits to Delaware State in the FCS and no one else.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wmi799:
The Degen in me
NC A&T +12
Not a deign play at all. A smart play that is well worth moneylining.
This ECU team under Montgomery is in lockstep with Hazel's Purdue teams in terms of incompetence. At this point I'd only be confident in them laying double digits to Delaware State in the FCS and no one else.
Why? I believe they have to have only two losses going to OSU in the final game of the season (a game they will obviously be dogs in and will have about a 35% chance of winning or worse).
Neb
@ NW
Maryland
Wisky
@ MSU
Penn State
They have to go 5-1 in those 6 for me to have the padding going into the OSU. Without 5-1 they have to win @ OSU. Other 4 games are not losable.
Is this bet dead?
I feel like it's dead and I should move on...
0
Question:
Is my Michigan over 8.5 wins -198 dead?
I feel like it's dead.
Why? I believe they have to have only two losses going to OSU in the final game of the season (a game they will obviously be dogs in and will have about a 35% chance of winning or worse).
Neb
@ NW
Maryland
Wisky
@ MSU
Penn State
They have to go 5-1 in those 6 for me to have the padding going into the OSU. Without 5-1 they have to win @ OSU. Other 4 games are not losable.
Maybe Gruden has his own agenda longterm and morph into a whackier version of John Madden as he gets older...his moves thus far are against conventional wisedom, and his quotes and sound bites make him look more out of touch with reality than anything else...i think this team is destined to implode this season and will likely look to trade Carr for picks, and start over fresh in Vegas with a completely new team which Gruden wants to build himself from the ground up...hes thinking about his own legacy here in my opinion and is willing to sacrifice this upcoming season to get exactly what he wants down the road...risky indeed, but i will give him the benefit of the doubt...but yeah, if Oakland goes better than 6-10 i would be surprised.
MAGAm Yisrael Chai
0
Maybe Gruden has his own agenda longterm and morph into a whackier version of John Madden as he gets older...his moves thus far are against conventional wisedom, and his quotes and sound bites make him look more out of touch with reality than anything else...i think this team is destined to implode this season and will likely look to trade Carr for picks, and start over fresh in Vegas with a completely new team which Gruden wants to build himself from the ground up...hes thinking about his own legacy here in my opinion and is willing to sacrifice this upcoming season to get exactly what he wants down the road...risky indeed, but i will give him the benefit of the doubt...but yeah, if Oakland goes better than 6-10 i would be surprised.
so i'm trying to work out a new local i found and i got a question for you fellas. have you ever heard of settling up at the end of the week, no matter what the account balance is? i've always had a +/-, at the very minumum, of $500. this guy says no rollover, we square up every weekend, even it's a couple hundred. he asks, if you were to win, you wouldn't want 200? i said no, i don't want to spend my time going all over chicago every week to meet up. he goes well,that's the way this will work. we can build up a relationship and build the account, but it will always have a zero roller unless it's to my discretion and it still will only be a few bucks. i get why he does it, but i've just never done it this way. what ya'll think?
No team is as good as it looks when winning nor are they as bad as they look when losing
0
so i'm trying to work out a new local i found and i got a question for you fellas. have you ever heard of settling up at the end of the week, no matter what the account balance is? i've always had a +/-, at the very minumum, of $500. this guy says no rollover, we square up every weekend, even it's a couple hundred. he asks, if you were to win, you wouldn't want 200? i said no, i don't want to spend my time going all over chicago every week to meet up. he goes well,that's the way this will work. we can build up a relationship and build the account, but it will always have a zero roller unless it's to my discretion and it still will only be a few bucks. i get why he does it, but i've just never done it this way. what ya'll think?
so i'm trying to work out a new local i found and i got a question for you fellas. have you ever heard of settling up at the end of the week, no matter what the account balance is? i've always had a +/-, at the very minumum, of $500. this guy says no rollover, we square up every weekend, even it's a couple hundred. he asks, if you were to win, you wouldn't want 200? i said no, i don't want to spend my time going all over chicago every week to meet up. he goes well,that's the way this will work. we can build up a relationship and build the account, but it will always have a zero roller unless it's to my discretion and it still will only be a few bucks. i get why he does it, but i've just never done it this way. what ya'll think?
also, a large number of his dogs are 10 cents more, i've seen up to 20. when i saw that, i was like well i might as well go back to heritage. this is insane
No team is as good as it looks when winning nor are they as bad as they look when losing
0
Quote Originally Posted by OlDirtyBaztid:
so i'm trying to work out a new local i found and i got a question for you fellas. have you ever heard of settling up at the end of the week, no matter what the account balance is? i've always had a +/-, at the very minumum, of $500. this guy says no rollover, we square up every weekend, even it's a couple hundred. he asks, if you were to win, you wouldn't want 200? i said no, i don't want to spend my time going all over chicago every week to meet up. he goes well,that's the way this will work. we can build up a relationship and build the account, but it will always have a zero roller unless it's to my discretion and it still will only be a few bucks. i get why he does it, but i've just never done it this way. what ya'll think?
also, a large number of his dogs are 10 cents more, i've seen up to 20. when i saw that, i was like well i might as well go back to heritage. this is insane
Hot Forum Topics
