Posted:
#151
"Decade of Dickishness" 
bigreds daddy
0
MAYWEATHER vs. McGREGOR: I want all the names of the Conor bettors in this thread. Man UP!!!
Posted:
#152
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
PARLAY:
Floyd -620 over Conor
WITH
Triple G -155 over Saul Alvarez (9/16)
This pays out exactly $91 and that is exactly -110. That can be posted in the W-L record and you will be compensate adequately for that. No need to get into Tripe G now. Tonight is about Floyd vs. Conor.
I don't want to interrupt the fact that this thread has deviated into a good ole'-fashioned "Scal-Bashing", but getting back to the original post, doesn't Scal still need "Triple G" to win to make this wager "official"?
I know it's always "Us against the bookies" and bad juju to wish a loss on a fellow degenerate, but these are extenuating circumstances. C'mon Canelo - YOU GOT THIS!!!!
We now return you to your regularly scheduled program.....
0
Posted:
#155
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:
scal ... you are my b!tch.
scal ... you are my b!tch.
You've been my b!tch on this site for many years.
You will be my b!tch for as long as you have the honor of sharing an internet forum with me.
Each time I address you with words, it is akin to me grabbing you by your permed afro and forcing your face into my crotch and violently fukking your collagen injected lips, while I hope that the charcoal you smear on your face doesn't soil my underwear.
You are my b!tch, scal
bigreds daddy
0
Posted:
#156
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
PARLAY:
Floyd -620 over Conor
WITH
Triple G -155 over Saul Alvarez (9/16)
This pays out exactly $91 and that is exactly -110. That can be posted in the W-L record and you will be compensate adequately for that. No need to get into Tripe G now. Tonight is about Floyd vs. Conor.
After the draw ... what was the result of this wager ?
bigreds daddy
0
Posted:
#159
Hugh....surely there has been a mistake here...Floyd was hovering around -400 leading up to that fight...surely Scal is a very sharp capper, and i highly doubt he would lock in any parlay with such a horrible line.
I didnt want to wager on Floyd in this circus match, but i do give props to my tennis buddy SamLangford for talking me into hammering it at -390 just before the fight...easiest money i made this year....and it was slightly more than $16
MAGAm Yisrael Chai
0
Posted:
#160
Quote Originally Posted by packersbackers:
Hugh....surely there has been a mistake here...Floyd was hovering around -400 leading up to that fight...surely Scal is a very sharp capper, and i highly doubt he would lock in any parlay with such a horrible line.
Hugh....surely there has been a mistake here...Floyd was hovering around -400 leading up to that fight...surely Scal is a very sharp capper, and i highly doubt he would lock in any parlay with such a horrible line.
I didnt want to wager on Floyd in this circus match, but i do give props to my tennis buddy SamLangford for talking me into hammering it at -390 just before the fight...easiest money i made this year....and it was slightly more than $16
How was Sammy\s write-up? Comparable to Scal?
0
Posted:
#162
Quote Originally Posted by lbcake:
How was Sammy\s write-up? Comparable to Scal?
It was about a 2 week discussion...great thread....Sam knew exactly how to play it...his tennis write ups were also a good read.
Im sure hes taking a break and will be back for the Australian open in Janauey
MAGAm Yisrael Chai
0
Posted:
#163
Mods I seriously cannot stay here anymore:
A 58 year old capper doesn’t know how a push in a parlay works
A capper from Oakland calls lines suspect at the moment the lines move in their favor gaining more value.
A tennis capper caps two matches out of 20 (I said he cod cap all 20 if he wanted) loses both, remains under .500 m, dishes out insults and even copies and pastes losing threads in another which have zero responses.
A 58 year old has been called out on his 40% bullshi* and right Now Scavenges through all my 500 picks in 8 years. Yes IM THE ONE WIHT NO LIFE.
Hugh I’ll trust any result you offer you’ve proven yourself to be more than honorable
0
Posted:
#165
Packers why is Hugh getting the percentages now???
I though you did all the accounting???
I’m sure all the wins and losses he’s wasting his life on now through hundreds of threads makes him look like quite the country club goer on a Friday night for dinner. Remember I’m the one with no life.
Tell him WHATEVER NUMBERS HE COMES UP with will be believed by you the rimjobber and everyone in the Penalty Box.
Even though this proves his previous posts that you copied and pasted were totally made up like I said.
Just make up new 40% figures and attach wins and losses to them! Viola! Everyone will believe them and not even think about calling him or you out for posting fictitious records for months.
Lolololololol!
Oh and add in my Hillary and Donald DNC speech wins to IMPROVE my 2016 62% record. I know he will! Lol!
If I at 58, lie endlessly, and then go back to retrace the steps of my lie and have enablers emboldening me to lie, put me out to pasture. Really! What a waste of a human life.
And he allegedly has children too! This is what he does instead of spending time with his kids. Sitting through hundreds of threads on covers so he can retrace his steps in a lie in full view!
0
Posted:
#166
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
you don’t even know how pushed in parlays work....!
you don’t even know how pushed in parlays work....!I can’t take it anymore!
It was a rhetorical question, you simpleton.
To anyone with half a brain it was obvious I was mocking your laughable return on the wager.
Of course you counted it as a win 
bigreds daddy
0
Posted:
#169
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:
It was a rhetorical question, you simpleton.
To anyone with half a brain it was obvious I was mocking your laughable return on the wager.
Of course you counted it as a win
What 'laughable return'? How do you even know how many units I bet/won on what I called out as a guaranteed winner? So much so I mocked all the players who actually lost money on the Conor side, perhaps the worst bet in boxing HISTORY. (and there are several in the Box right now!)
Stump assumes I bet $100 on because well, like you, he just makes it up as he goes along!
0
Posted:
#170
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
What 'laughable return'? How do you even know how many units I bet/won on what I called out as a guaranteed winner? So much so I mocked all the players who actually lost money on the Conor side, perhaps the worst bet in boxing HISTORY. (and there are several in the Box right now!)
Stump assumes I bet $100 on because well, like you, he just makes it up as he goes along!
I was saying $16 against -110. Quick math and not exact. I wasn't saying I thought your actual return was $16. I'm a lot of things but i'm not one of these guys who says things like, "I bet you only bet 20 bucks! Blah, Blah, Blah..." I don't spend time in anyone's pocket and I give everyone the benefit of the doubt. What you bet is your business.
R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
0
Posted:
#171
Scal, I don't assume and I don't make up sh*t. I don't live in some fantasy world where I swing my penis around like a lasso and use it to corner complete strangers, male complete strangers, into portable toilets. I deal in facts. Numbers and probabilities. You wanna tell me how off the math I did in my head, in like half a second, is? I dare you. Like i've said before, you're all talk. And that talk is paper thin. And little by little you've been exposed and it's killing you. You you whine like a indigent child. "I can't take it anymore! I just can't..." "This is why i'm leaving here, you can't make this stuff up!" You plead to the mods like you're under contract. As the people's Champ has said plenty of times, you don't have to be here. If it frustrates you so, f*cking leave.
R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
0
Posted:
#172
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
Scal, I don't assume and I don't make up sh*t. I don't live in some fantasy world where I swing my penis around like a lasso and use it to corner complete strangers, male complete strangers, into portable toilets. I deal in facts. Numbers and probabilities. You wanna tell me how off the math I did in my head, in like half a second, is? I dare you. Like i've said before, you're all talk. And that talk is paper thin. And little by little you've been exposed and it's killing you. You you whine like a indigent child. "I can't take it anymore! I just can't..." "This is why i'm leaving here, you can't make this stuff up!" You plead to the mods like you're under contract. As the people's Champ has said plenty of times, you don't have to be here. If it frustrates you so, f*cking leave.
Scal, I don't assume and I don't make up sh*t. I don't live in some fantasy world where I swing my penis around like a lasso and use it to corner complete strangers, male complete strangers, into portable toilets. I deal in facts. Numbers and probabilities. You wanna tell me how off the math I did in my head, in like half a second, is? I dare you. Like i've said before, you're all talk. And that talk is paper thin. And little by little you've been exposed and it's killing you. You you whine like a indigent child. "I can't take it anymore! I just can't..." "This is why i'm leaving here, you can't make this stuff up!" You plead to the mods like you're under contract. As the people's Champ has said plenty of times, you don't have to be here. If it frustrates you so, f*cking leave.
I knew you weren't black
0
Posted:
#175
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
What 'laughable return'? How do you even know how many units I bet/won on what I called out as a guaranteed winner?
What ?!?!?!?!?!?!?
You won a wager on a -620 favorite, and now you want to pound your chest as if it is some sort of major accomplishment???
It does not matter how many unites you bet, you're return on a -620 fav is laughable.
Are you really this stupid?
(that's another rhetorical question)
bigreds daddy
0
Hot Forum Topics
