Posted:
#26
Two black kids lit a white kid on fire a couple weeks ago...........havent heard what became of that.
0
Based on how they are handling this case, I guess the police want 'race riots' in Florida
Posted:
#27
Can you guys imagine if everyone just ignored these guys threads?
No replies and they just fell out of circulation and off the front page of GD forum within a few hours of him posting every time?
Personally that would give me a great deal of satisfaction. And it has nothing to do with any sort of ideological differences or whatever with Scal, I just think his argument baiting threads are ridiculous.
No replies and they just fell out of circulation and off the front page of GD forum within a few hours of him posting every time?
Personally that would give me a great deal of satisfaction. And it has nothing to do with any sort of ideological differences or whatever with Scal, I just think his argument baiting threads are ridiculous.
0
Posted:
#28
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
You are missing the point here. You were trying to hate on white people and stir shit up like you always do. Do I think the situation is fucked up? Yes. But do I turn it into something its not? NO. ONly dumb asses like yourself try to make everything into a white vs Black type of deal. You are a moron. Thats all there is to it. You know you are an idiot because anytime someone writes a though out, correct response you are done and never have a comeback. I have said before and will again, I feel sorry for those who come in daily contact with you because you harm society with these thoughts way more than you help.
You don't even know the facts surrounding the story? Try reading it once.
I guess this really WAS just about some kind of 'racial out' you are pulling with Zimmerman being Hispanic. Kid, you're a joke...
0
Posted:
#29
Quote Originally Posted by crod1980:
George Zimmerman is Hispanic and grew up in a multiracial family, the statement says.
4th paragraph.
George Zimmerman is Hispanic and grew up in a multiracial family, the statement says.
4th paragraph.
That's just too funny.
Facts will always come back and bite you in the ass Scal. You have too much hate in your heart against the white man.
If you feel this strong about the injustice of your people, go out in the real world and be pro-active instead of complaining on the internet.
0
Posted:
#30
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Why is that? Because I knew of information that you didn't? Information which not only discredited your theory on possible Race Wars, but also made you look like a complete tool?
Also, you complained that it wasn't fair that I linked an updated News story that was posted online at 10:42 EST, but yet my post overturning your White Man can do no wrong thesis was made a mere 27 minutes after your initial post and 29 minutes before the story that I linked.
It's people like this that annoy the fuck out of me.
This is clearly a white individual who had no covers account until probably, today, and saw fit to create one JUST to log on to tell the covers community that George Zimmerman was Hispanic.
I'm offering 1 million to 1 if Crod1980 is not a white male. Any takers?
Why is that? Because I knew of information that you didn't? Information which not only discredited your theory on possible Race Wars, but also made you look like a complete tool?
Also, you complained that it wasn't fair that I linked an updated News story that was posted online at 10:42 EST, but yet my post overturning your White Man can do no wrong thesis was made a mere 27 minutes after your initial post and 29 minutes before the story that I linked.
0
Posted:
#31
Quote Originally Posted by EddieGordo:
Can you guys imagine if everyone just ignored these guys threads?
No replies and they just fell out of circulation and off the front page of GD forum within a few hours of him posting every time?
Personally that would give me a great deal of satisfaction. And it has nothing to do with any sort of ideological differences or whatever with Scal, I just think his argument baiting threads are ridiculous.
Can you guys imagine if everyone just ignored these guys threads?
No replies and they just fell out of circulation and off the front page of GD forum within a few hours of him posting every time?
Personally that would give me a great deal of satisfaction. And it has nothing to do with any sort of ideological differences or whatever with Scal, I just think his argument baiting threads are ridiculous.
Sorry EddieGordo, I don't normally enjoy arguing with people over racial issues like this, but when I started reading the original post, I knew this guy had to be set straight because of his speculations and wrong facts that he was desperately trying to use as leverage to start a White against Black debate.
0
Posted:
#40
Galt,
Scalabrine, some call him scabes is our resident racist at covers.
go look at his past threads, anything he can say bad about whitie he does, sad really. Youll see him on here more during the mid-month before his next welfare check comes in, and he complains about "the man" keeping him down
0
Posted:
#42
Haha just reread all this....
Wow Scal.....Crod1980 just destroyed you. Any objective person can clearly see that you spent a bunch of time preparing another long winded race-baited argument, you got your facts wrong, and he pointed out that your argument was invalid and thus a waste of time.
And all you can respond with is Rolling laughing heads and jibber jabber about frying fish with paprika
Your posts are obviously well written and you must possess some intelligence based on your grammar/syntax/vocabulary etc. However it seems like whenever someone makes a point that might actually be valid and correctly contradict your argument all you can do is respond with juvenile name calling and emoticons.
It would lend a lot more credence to your arguments and your cause in general if when someone such as Crod tried pointing out inaccuracies in your post, if you were to aknowledge the fact that occasionally you might be wrong or off line. Instead your respond by insulting his intelligence, calling him racist and all that. When really all he did was correctly point out that you did not have your facts correct. He did not even call you names or discredit your cause or anything, just pointed out that you jumped the gun on the race of the security guard.
So Scal while you're real good at baiting others into arguments....sadly when the people you're arguing with have some sort of rational counter argument you are too blinded by the need to argue and puff up your chest to EVER admit when you might be wrong. This makes you come off as pompous and arrogant, and combined with your blatantly desperate need to argue and berate others (more likely than not just due to extreme boredom with your daily life) basically makes people despise you and never take you seriously. Which is exactly what you want because then it just perpetuates your never ending cycle of played out racial arguments, and you can keep getting into pointless debates about racism in America. Because hey, nothings more fun than having the same dumb argument over and over again with people you are fully aware will never agree with you or let your opinion influence them. Arguing for the sake or arguing and making yourself look like some sort of uber-intelligent racial crusader isn't really working out for you. You just come off as desperate for attention really.
Wow Scal.....Crod1980 just destroyed you. Any objective person can clearly see that you spent a bunch of time preparing another long winded race-baited argument, you got your facts wrong, and he pointed out that your argument was invalid and thus a waste of time.
And all you can respond with is Rolling laughing heads and jibber jabber about frying fish with paprika
Your posts are obviously well written and you must possess some intelligence based on your grammar/syntax/vocabulary etc. However it seems like whenever someone makes a point that might actually be valid and correctly contradict your argument all you can do is respond with juvenile name calling and emoticons.
It would lend a lot more credence to your arguments and your cause in general if when someone such as Crod tried pointing out inaccuracies in your post, if you were to aknowledge the fact that occasionally you might be wrong or off line. Instead your respond by insulting his intelligence, calling him racist and all that. When really all he did was correctly point out that you did not have your facts correct. He did not even call you names or discredit your cause or anything, just pointed out that you jumped the gun on the race of the security guard.
So Scal while you're real good at baiting others into arguments....sadly when the people you're arguing with have some sort of rational counter argument you are too blinded by the need to argue and puff up your chest to EVER admit when you might be wrong. This makes you come off as pompous and arrogant, and combined with your blatantly desperate need to argue and berate others (more likely than not just due to extreme boredom with your daily life) basically makes people despise you and never take you seriously. Which is exactly what you want because then it just perpetuates your never ending cycle of played out racial arguments, and you can keep getting into pointless debates about racism in America. Because hey, nothings more fun than having the same dumb argument over and over again with people you are fully aware will never agree with you or let your opinion influence them. Arguing for the sake or arguing and making yourself look like some sort of uber-intelligent racial crusader isn't really working out for you. You just come off as desperate for attention really.
0
Posted:
#45
Quote Originally Posted by crod1980:
You made it a point to say that the man who shot the Black kid was white 5 times. This was your whole point of making this thread. If you would have known that the man was of Hispanic origin, this thread would not exist, so don't try and turn the tables on me stating that it is now about the cops not doing their job.
I suggest you reread your original post.
You made it a point to say that the man who shot the Black kid was white 5 times. This was your whole point of making this thread. If you would have known that the man was of Hispanic origin, this thread would not exist, so don't try and turn the tables on me stating that it is now about the cops not doing their job.
I suggest you reread your original post.
Amen. 
0
excellent thread...
Posted:
#49
Quote Originally Posted by EddieGordo:
Haha just reread all this....
Wow Scal.....Crod1980 just destroyed you. Any objective person can clearly see that you spent a bunch of time preparing another long winded race-baited argument, you got your facts wrong, and he pointed out that your argument was invalid and thus a waste of time.
And all you can respond with is Rolling laughing heads and jibber jabber about frying fish with paprika
Your posts are obviously well written and you must possess some intelligence based on your grammar/syntax/vocabulary etc. However it seems like whenever someone makes a point that might actually be valid and correctly contradict your argument all you can do is respond with juvenile name calling and emoticons.
It would lend a lot more credence to your arguments and your cause in general if when someone such as Crod tried pointing out inaccuracies in your post, if you were to aknowledge the fact that occasionally you might be wrong or off line. Instead your respond by insulting his intelligence, calling him racist and all that. When really all he did was correctly point out that you did not have your facts correct. He did not even call you names or discredit your cause or anything, just pointed out that you jumped the gun on the race of the security guard.
So Scal while you're real good at baiting others into arguments....sadly when the people you're arguing with have some sort of rational counter argument you are too blinded by the need to argue and puff up your chest to EVER admit when you might be wrong. This makes you come off as pompous and arrogant, and combined with your blatantly desperate need to argue and berate others (more likely than not just due to extreme boredom with your daily life) basically makes people despise you and never take you seriously. Which is exactly what you want because then it just perpetuates your never ending cycle of played out racial arguments, and you can keep getting into pointless debates about racism in America. Because hey, nothings more fun than having the same dumb argument over and over again with people you are fully aware will never agree with you or let your opinion influence them. Arguing for the sake or arguing and making yourself look like some sort of uber-intelligent racial crusader isn't really working out for you. You just come off as desperate for attention really.
Haha just reread all this....
Wow Scal.....Crod1980 just destroyed you. Any objective person can clearly see that you spent a bunch of time preparing another long winded race-baited argument, you got your facts wrong, and he pointed out that your argument was invalid and thus a waste of time.
And all you can respond with is Rolling laughing heads and jibber jabber about frying fish with paprika
Your posts are obviously well written and you must possess some intelligence based on your grammar/syntax/vocabulary etc. However it seems like whenever someone makes a point that might actually be valid and correctly contradict your argument all you can do is respond with juvenile name calling and emoticons.
It would lend a lot more credence to your arguments and your cause in general if when someone such as Crod tried pointing out inaccuracies in your post, if you were to aknowledge the fact that occasionally you might be wrong or off line. Instead your respond by insulting his intelligence, calling him racist and all that. When really all he did was correctly point out that you did not have your facts correct. He did not even call you names or discredit your cause or anything, just pointed out that you jumped the gun on the race of the security guard.
So Scal while you're real good at baiting others into arguments....sadly when the people you're arguing with have some sort of rational counter argument you are too blinded by the need to argue and puff up your chest to EVER admit when you might be wrong. This makes you come off as pompous and arrogant, and combined with your blatantly desperate need to argue and berate others (more likely than not just due to extreme boredom with your daily life) basically makes people despise you and never take you seriously. Which is exactly what you want because then it just perpetuates your never ending cycle of played out racial arguments, and you can keep getting into pointless debates about racism in America. Because hey, nothings more fun than having the same dumb argument over and over again with people you are fully aware will never agree with you or let your opinion influence them. Arguing for the sake or arguing and making yourself look like some sort of uber-intelligent racial crusader isn't really working out for you. You just come off as desperate for attention really.
This
I can't stand people like this......and I'm not talking about race baiting assholes......I'm speaking of people that can't admit a mistake, and/or change the argument once they realize their original statement was wrong
0
Posted:
#50
Quote Originally Posted by EddieGordo:
Haha just reread all this....
Wow Scal.....Crod1980 just destroyed you. Any objective person can clearly see that you spent a bunch of time preparing another long winded race-baited argument, you got your facts wrong, and he pointed out that your argument was invalid and thus a waste of time.
And all you can respond with is Rolling laughing heads and jibber jabber about frying fish with paprika
Your posts are obviously well written and you must possess some intelligence based on your grammar/syntax/vocabulary etc. However it seems like whenever someone makes a point that might actually be valid and correctly contradict your argument all you can do is respond with juvenile name calling and emoticons.
It would lend a lot more credence to your arguments and your cause in general if when someone such as Crod tried pointing out inaccuracies in your post, if you were to aknowledge the fact that occasionally you might be wrong or off line. Instead your respond by insulting his intelligence, calling him racist and all that. When really all he did was correctly point out that you did not have your facts correct. He did not even call you names or discredit your cause or anything, just pointed out that you jumped the gun on the race of the security guard.
So Scal while you're real good at baiting others into arguments....sadly when the people you're arguing with have some sort of rational counter argument you are too blinded by the need to argue and puff up your chest to EVER admit when you might be wrong. This makes you come off as pompous and arrogant, and combined with your blatantly desperate need to argue and berate others (more likely than not just due to extreme boredom with your daily life) basically makes people despise you and never take you seriously. Which is exactly what you want because then it just perpetuates your never ending cycle of played out racial arguments, and you can keep getting into pointless debates about racism in America. Because hey, nothings more fun than having the same dumb argument over and over again with people you are fully aware will never agree with you or let your opinion influence them. Arguing for the sake or arguing and making yourself look like some sort of uber-intelligent racial crusader isn't really working out for you. You just come off as desperate for attention really.
Haha just reread all this....
Wow Scal.....Crod1980 just destroyed you. Any objective person can clearly see that you spent a bunch of time preparing another long winded race-baited argument, you got your facts wrong, and he pointed out that your argument was invalid and thus a waste of time.
And all you can respond with is Rolling laughing heads and jibber jabber about frying fish with paprika
Your posts are obviously well written and you must possess some intelligence based on your grammar/syntax/vocabulary etc. However it seems like whenever someone makes a point that might actually be valid and correctly contradict your argument all you can do is respond with juvenile name calling and emoticons.
It would lend a lot more credence to your arguments and your cause in general if when someone such as Crod tried pointing out inaccuracies in your post, if you were to aknowledge the fact that occasionally you might be wrong or off line. Instead your respond by insulting his intelligence, calling him racist and all that. When really all he did was correctly point out that you did not have your facts correct. He did not even call you names or discredit your cause or anything, just pointed out that you jumped the gun on the race of the security guard.
So Scal while you're real good at baiting others into arguments....sadly when the people you're arguing with have some sort of rational counter argument you are too blinded by the need to argue and puff up your chest to EVER admit when you might be wrong. This makes you come off as pompous and arrogant, and combined with your blatantly desperate need to argue and berate others (more likely than not just due to extreme boredom with your daily life) basically makes people despise you and never take you seriously. Which is exactly what you want because then it just perpetuates your never ending cycle of played out racial arguments, and you can keep getting into pointless debates about racism in America. Because hey, nothings more fun than having the same dumb argument over and over again with people you are fully aware will never agree with you or let your opinion influence them. Arguing for the sake or arguing and making yourself look like some sort of uber-intelligent racial crusader isn't really working out for you. You just come off as desperate for attention really.
^
0
Hot Forum Topics
