Wow, Two incidents within weeks of police officers getting shot and killed, It's no longer a lone wolf situation, There is clearly a serious, serious and i mean serious anti police sentiment going round, It needs to be addressed.
3 Police officers killed in Baton Rouge, 5/6 more injured
Wow, Two incidents within weeks of police officers getting shot and killed, It's no longer a lone wolf situation, There is clearly a serious, serious and i mean serious anti police sentiment going round, It needs to be addressed.
Wow, Two incidents within weeks of police officers getting shot and killed, It's no longer a lone wolf situation, There is clearly a serious, serious and i mean serious anti police sentiment going round, It needs to be addressed.
Israel has a wall. Spain has a wall. India has a wall. Turkey is building a wall. Why can’t the US protect its citizens from criminals? The United States has a right to protect its citizens. Is your house open door? I bet it is not. You don’t like having strangers just come into your home. Do you? If a stranger comes into your house, are you going to offer them a drink and a place to stay? Or are you going to have them arrested or shoot them? My guess is arrested or shot. Why? Because they broke the law, that’s why. The US is my home. I want a list of people entering my home. It is illegal to come to this country without proper documentation. Obtain proper documentation and that person is more than welcome to my home. Too many Americans are getting killed and raped by illegal immigrants. The total is in the thousands. It has to stop.
The land of the free doesn’t mean you can freely enter as you please. It refers to American citizens having the freedom to pursue their life goals and the freedom to make their own choices. If Trump said he wanted to ban the K-K-K or Nazi’s or Bloods or CRIPS, would you have an issue? The US is at war with Islam. There is a group of people responsible for committing 28,835 terror attacks in the last 15 years. That group happens to be Muslims. It’s about safety. It makes sense to protect Americans from Muslims. When will it be OK to ban Muslims? After 30 thousand or 40 thousand attacks? Maybe 50,000 attacks and then liberals will be on the side of common sense? How many more attacks and people have to die before you feel comfortable? So bombing the terrorist group’s money supply bothers you? I don’t even know what to say to that...
1. Coal miners don’t risk their lives to protect other people lives - stupid analogy. Cops are domestic soldiers. If you feel that way about cops, then you must think US soldiers aren’t heroes. Just stupid.
2. All police agencies are trying to get cameras for every officer. This is not new. The issue is funding. Believe it or not, but every cop wants body-cams and dash-cams. It protects them.
3. Every shooting is investigated. Everything an officer does is investigated. The division is called Internal Affairs. An officer already is subject to the same punishment as a civilian, if that officer committed a criminal act.
You presented nothing new.
Israel has a wall. Spain has a wall. India has a wall. Turkey is building a wall. Why can’t the US protect its citizens from criminals? The United States has a right to protect its citizens. Is your house open door? I bet it is not. You don’t like having strangers just come into your home. Do you? If a stranger comes into your house, are you going to offer them a drink and a place to stay? Or are you going to have them arrested or shoot them? My guess is arrested or shot. Why? Because they broke the law, that’s why. The US is my home. I want a list of people entering my home. It is illegal to come to this country without proper documentation. Obtain proper documentation and that person is more than welcome to my home. Too many Americans are getting killed and raped by illegal immigrants. The total is in the thousands. It has to stop.
The land of the free doesn’t mean you can freely enter as you please. It refers to American citizens having the freedom to pursue their life goals and the freedom to make their own choices. If Trump said he wanted to ban the K-K-K or Nazi’s or Bloods or CRIPS, would you have an issue? The US is at war with Islam. There is a group of people responsible for committing 28,835 terror attacks in the last 15 years. That group happens to be Muslims. It’s about safety. It makes sense to protect Americans from Muslims. When will it be OK to ban Muslims? After 30 thousand or 40 thousand attacks? Maybe 50,000 attacks and then liberals will be on the side of common sense? How many more attacks and people have to die before you feel comfortable? So bombing the terrorist group’s money supply bothers you? I don’t even know what to say to that...
1. Coal miners don’t risk their lives to protect other people lives - stupid analogy. Cops are domestic soldiers. If you feel that way about cops, then you must think US soldiers aren’t heroes. Just stupid.
2. All police agencies are trying to get cameras for every officer. This is not new. The issue is funding. Believe it or not, but every cop wants body-cams and dash-cams. It protects them.
3. Every shooting is investigated. Everything an officer does is investigated. The division is called Internal Affairs. An officer already is subject to the same punishment as a civilian, if that officer committed a criminal act.
You presented nothing new.
I can't wait until the truth finally gets reported about Filandro Castile and his hooker girlfriend. That dumb biitch didn't even know how old that he was.
I can't wait until the truth finally gets reported about Filandro Castile and his hooker girlfriend. That dumb biitch didn't even know how old that he was.
Sabine Durden
Kathryn Steinle
Jamiel Shaw Jr
Brandon Mendoza
Christopher Maier
Leafie Mason
Claudia Benton
Norman J. Sirnicor
Noemi Dominguez
Josephine Konvicka
George Morber
Carolyn Frederick
Jesse Howell
Wendy VonHuben
Michael White
Noemi Dominguez
Josephine Konvicka
George Morber
Jesse Howell
Wendy VonHuben
Michael White
Dominic Daniel Durden
Kevin Will
Brandy Lee Thorne
Grant Ronnebeck
Jesse Benavides
Emily Cortez
Sviatlana Dranko
Spencer Golvach
Margaret Kostelnik
Bob Barry
Michael Grubbs
Grant Ronnebeck
Jamie Oxendine
Mary Ann Oxendine
Abigail Robinson
Heather M. Coble
Louise Sollowin
Thousands are all dead because of illegal immigrants - I could’ve kept on going... How many more have to die liberals?
Hello. Are Italians killing people? Are Africans killing people? The US has been at war with Islam for the last 40 years. Muslims have killed 270+ million people since Islam was created and the Muslim acts of terrorism clock is now at 28,853. How many more have to die liberals?
https://www.policeone.com/police-products/body-cameras/articles/8243271-For-police-body-cameras-big-costs-loom-in-storage/
Your comments are so stupid and ignorant that I’m not even going to address it. Like I said, you presented nothing new!
Sabine Durden
Kathryn Steinle
Jamiel Shaw Jr
Brandon Mendoza
Christopher Maier
Leafie Mason
Claudia Benton
Norman J. Sirnicor
Noemi Dominguez
Josephine Konvicka
George Morber
Carolyn Frederick
Jesse Howell
Wendy VonHuben
Michael White
Noemi Dominguez
Josephine Konvicka
George Morber
Jesse Howell
Wendy VonHuben
Michael White
Dominic Daniel Durden
Kevin Will
Brandy Lee Thorne
Grant Ronnebeck
Jesse Benavides
Emily Cortez
Sviatlana Dranko
Spencer Golvach
Margaret Kostelnik
Bob Barry
Michael Grubbs
Grant Ronnebeck
Jamie Oxendine
Mary Ann Oxendine
Abigail Robinson
Heather M. Coble
Louise Sollowin
Thousands are all dead because of illegal immigrants - I could’ve kept on going... How many more have to die liberals?
Hello. Are Italians killing people? Are Africans killing people? The US has been at war with Islam for the last 40 years. Muslims have killed 270+ million people since Islam was created and the Muslim acts of terrorism clock is now at 28,853. How many more have to die liberals?
https://www.policeone.com/police-products/body-cameras/articles/8243271-For-police-body-cameras-big-costs-loom-in-storage/
Your comments are so stupid and ignorant that I’m not even going to address it. Like I said, you presented nothing new!
Why is securing the border such an issue for liberals?
Sabine Durden
Kathryn Steinle
Jamiel Shaw Jr
Brandon Mendoza
Christopher Maier
Leafie Mason
Claudia Benton
Norman J. Sirnicor
Noemi Dominguez
Josephine Konvicka
George Morber
Carolyn Frederick
Jesse Howell
Wendy VonHuben
Michael White
Noemi Dominguez
Josephine Konvicka
George Morber
Jesse Howell
Wendy VonHuben
Michael White
Dominic Daniel Durden
Kevin Will
Brandy Lee Thorne
Grant Ronnebeck
Jesse Benavides
Emily Cortez
Sviatlana Dranko
Spencer Golvach
Margaret Kostelnik
Bob Barry
Michael Grubbs
Grant Ronnebeck
Jamie Oxendine
Mary Ann Oxendine
Abigail Robinson
Heather M. Coble
Louise Sollowin
Thousands are all dead because of illegal immigrants - I could’ve kept on going... How many more have to die liberals?
Hello. Are Italians killing people? Are Africans killing people? The US has been at war with Islam for the last 40 years. Muslims have killed 270+ million people since Islam was created and the Muslim acts of terrorism clock is now at 28,853. How many more have to die liberals?
https://www.policeone.com/police-products/body-cameras/articles/8243271-For-police-body-cameras-big-costs-loom-in-storage/
Your comments are so stupid and ignorant that I’m not even going to address it. Like I said, you presented nothing new!
Why is securing the border such an issue for liberals?
Sabine Durden
Kathryn Steinle
Jamiel Shaw Jr
Brandon Mendoza
Christopher Maier
Leafie Mason
Claudia Benton
Norman J. Sirnicor
Noemi Dominguez
Josephine Konvicka
George Morber
Carolyn Frederick
Jesse Howell
Wendy VonHuben
Michael White
Noemi Dominguez
Josephine Konvicka
George Morber
Jesse Howell
Wendy VonHuben
Michael White
Dominic Daniel Durden
Kevin Will
Brandy Lee Thorne
Grant Ronnebeck
Jesse Benavides
Emily Cortez
Sviatlana Dranko
Spencer Golvach
Margaret Kostelnik
Bob Barry
Michael Grubbs
Grant Ronnebeck
Jamie Oxendine
Mary Ann Oxendine
Abigail Robinson
Heather M. Coble
Louise Sollowin
Thousands are all dead because of illegal immigrants - I could’ve kept on going... How many more have to die liberals?
Hello. Are Italians killing people? Are Africans killing people? The US has been at war with Islam for the last 40 years. Muslims have killed 270+ million people since Islam was created and the Muslim acts of terrorism clock is now at 28,853. How many more have to die liberals?
https://www.policeone.com/police-products/body-cameras/articles/8243271-For-police-body-cameras-big-costs-loom-in-storage/
Your comments are so stupid and ignorant that I’m not even going to address it. Like I said, you presented nothing new!
Bullsh!t! Eric Garner had a heart attack on the way to the hospital.
Bullsh!t! The officers that killed Tamir Rice were both told by dispatch that a juvenile was pointing a gun at people. The officers get on scene and Rice reaches for the gun in his waistband. The officer fired two shots and Rice was killed. The sister was tackled because it is illegal to be at an active crime scene.
Bullsh!t! Sandra Bland broke 3 laws. Disregarding officers orders, disorderly conduct, and resisting arrest. The psycho committed suicide and hung herself.
Bullsh!t! Freddie Gray wasn’t some model citizen. Gray has a record that was 20+ pages long. The thug ran from police and died in the police van. The moral of the story is don’t run from police and don’t act belligerent. That’s why Gray was restrained from head to toe in the first place.
You couldn’t list a single case of a model citizen innocently killed by police. I’ve been a juror on 3 different occasions. The prosecutor and defense both get to pick the jurors. The problem is you live in a fantasy world and are in a permanent state of pure delusion.
Bullsh!t! Eric Garner had a heart attack on the way to the hospital.
Bullsh!t! The officers that killed Tamir Rice were both told by dispatch that a juvenile was pointing a gun at people. The officers get on scene and Rice reaches for the gun in his waistband. The officer fired two shots and Rice was killed. The sister was tackled because it is illegal to be at an active crime scene.
Bullsh!t! Sandra Bland broke 3 laws. Disregarding officers orders, disorderly conduct, and resisting arrest. The psycho committed suicide and hung herself.
Bullsh!t! Freddie Gray wasn’t some model citizen. Gray has a record that was 20+ pages long. The thug ran from police and died in the police van. The moral of the story is don’t run from police and don’t act belligerent. That’s why Gray was restrained from head to toe in the first place.
You couldn’t list a single case of a model citizen innocently killed by police. I’ve been a juror on 3 different occasions. The prosecutor and defense both get to pick the jurors. The problem is you live in a fantasy world and are in a permanent state of pure delusion.
The cost will be paid for by Mexico. The United States gives Mexico on average about 400 million dollars a year in aid. That money could go towards the protection of Americans. If the United States decided to ban travel to Mexico, if Mexico was to revolt against Trumps plans, the Mexican economy would lose about 4 billion dollars in revenue. The United States is in charge, not Mexico.
The US/Canadian border is already getting vamped up. I’m sure Trump would put a similar focus on the Canadian border as well. The bigger threat to Americans comes from Mexico at this time. Not many criminals or terrorists coming from Alaska, Greenland, and Canada.
I’m not going to address the police shooting of the medical care worker at this time. I’m waiting for all the facts and circumstances to come out.
Every police agency in the country wants body cams. The issue every time is funding. I’m best friends with a police chief and a sheriff. It took them 5 years of complaining to get body cameras. It wasn’t until this year when they got cameras for every officer. Now the problem is how long it will last? Both are tasked with a problem to continually fund the program. It’s going to cost thousands to maintain. The plan is to increase drug busts for more cash confiscations and confiscated property.
My solution is simple - comply with officers! I see nothing wrong with the protocols police use. Police use the Use of Force Continuum and the Totality of the Circumstances Standard. The standards come from U.S. Supreme Court rulings. If police do wrong, internal affairs investigates, and police have to answer to a judge and a jury of reasonable peers for what the officer did.
The cost will be paid for by Mexico. The United States gives Mexico on average about 400 million dollars a year in aid. That money could go towards the protection of Americans. If the United States decided to ban travel to Mexico, if Mexico was to revolt against Trumps plans, the Mexican economy would lose about 4 billion dollars in revenue. The United States is in charge, not Mexico.
The US/Canadian border is already getting vamped up. I’m sure Trump would put a similar focus on the Canadian border as well. The bigger threat to Americans comes from Mexico at this time. Not many criminals or terrorists coming from Alaska, Greenland, and Canada.
I’m not going to address the police shooting of the medical care worker at this time. I’m waiting for all the facts and circumstances to come out.
Every police agency in the country wants body cams. The issue every time is funding. I’m best friends with a police chief and a sheriff. It took them 5 years of complaining to get body cameras. It wasn’t until this year when they got cameras for every officer. Now the problem is how long it will last? Both are tasked with a problem to continually fund the program. It’s going to cost thousands to maintain. The plan is to increase drug busts for more cash confiscations and confiscated property.
My solution is simple - comply with officers! I see nothing wrong with the protocols police use. Police use the Use of Force Continuum and the Totality of the Circumstances Standard. The standards come from U.S. Supreme Court rulings. If police do wrong, internal affairs investigates, and police have to answer to a judge and a jury of reasonable peers for what the officer did.
The autopsy from the medical examiner attributed his death to homicide - meaning death at the hands of another party, not murder, in medical parlance - and stated that he died thanks to - compression of neck, compression of chest and prone positioning during physical restraint by police. But the autopsy further noted that Garner died thanks to acute and chronic bronchial asthma, obesity, and heart disease.
The officer was about 5’10 and 180 pounds. Garner was about 6’4 and almost 400 pounds. The thug - with 30+ arrests - was 6 inches taller and 200 pounds heavier. The small in comparison officer was instructed with the huge task to take Garner down. All the officer did was apply a takedown technique that he learned in the police academy - when Garner resisted arrest.
What happened was the takedown technique was instrumental in triggering Garner’s pre-existing health problems and led to his death, but Garner was not choked to death, Garner did not die of asphyxiation, he died of acute and chronic bronchial asthma, obesity, and heart disease. The takedown hold didn’t kill Garner.
The reason the officer was found not guilty was because the jury thought if Garner had otherwise been healthy, would he have died from use of takedown hold? The obvious answer is no, of course not. The jury found that if Garner did not resist arrest, and was healthy, the outcome of this case would have been very different.
Come on, embarrass me...
The autopsy from the medical examiner attributed his death to homicide - meaning death at the hands of another party, not murder, in medical parlance - and stated that he died thanks to - compression of neck, compression of chest and prone positioning during physical restraint by police. But the autopsy further noted that Garner died thanks to acute and chronic bronchial asthma, obesity, and heart disease.
The officer was about 5’10 and 180 pounds. Garner was about 6’4 and almost 400 pounds. The thug - with 30+ arrests - was 6 inches taller and 200 pounds heavier. The small in comparison officer was instructed with the huge task to take Garner down. All the officer did was apply a takedown technique that he learned in the police academy - when Garner resisted arrest.
What happened was the takedown technique was instrumental in triggering Garner’s pre-existing health problems and led to his death, but Garner was not choked to death, Garner did not die of asphyxiation, he died of acute and chronic bronchial asthma, obesity, and heart disease. The takedown hold didn’t kill Garner.
The reason the officer was found not guilty was because the jury thought if Garner had otherwise been healthy, would he have died from use of takedown hold? The obvious answer is no, of course not. The jury found that if Garner did not resist arrest, and was healthy, the outcome of this case would have been very different.
Come on, embarrass me...
Embarrass me? Debating you is a piece of cake...
The autopsy from the medical examiner attributed his death to homicide - meaning death at the hands of another party, not murder, in medical parlance - and stated that he died thanks to - compression of neck, compression of chest and prone positioning during physical restraint by police. But the autopsy further noted that Garner died thanks to acute and chronic bronchial asthma, obesity, and heart disease.
The officer was about 5’10 and 180 pounds. Garner was about 6’4 and almost 400 pounds. The thug - with 30+ arrests - was 6 inches taller and 200 pounds heavier. The small in comparison officer was instructed with the huge task to take Garner down. All the officer did was apply a takedown technique that he learned in the police academy - when Garner resisted arrest.
What happened was the takedown technique was instrumental in triggering Garner’s pre-existing health problems and led to his death, but Garner was not choked to death, Garner did not die of asphyxiation, he died of acute and chronic bronchial asthma, obesity, and heart disease. The takedown hold didn’t kill Garner.
The reason the officer was found not guilty was because the jury thought if Garner had otherwise been healthy, would he have died from use of takedown hold? The obvious answer is no, of course not. The jury found that if Garner did not resist arrest, and was healthy, the outcome of this case would have been very different.
Come on, embarrass me...
Gosh, I don't even know if I should put in the time now.
Saying Trump is the best candidate in the past 50 years pretty much takes the cake in terms of embarrassing yourself, and that's even among covers worst. When Slovak, Hugh and Gimmee have such low opinions of you, I don't know how I could make the situation any worse or how much you could even understand in terms of counter-argumentation (which so far has been little to none).
Embarrass me? Debating you is a piece of cake...
The autopsy from the medical examiner attributed his death to homicide - meaning death at the hands of another party, not murder, in medical parlance - and stated that he died thanks to - compression of neck, compression of chest and prone positioning during physical restraint by police. But the autopsy further noted that Garner died thanks to acute and chronic bronchial asthma, obesity, and heart disease.
The officer was about 5’10 and 180 pounds. Garner was about 6’4 and almost 400 pounds. The thug - with 30+ arrests - was 6 inches taller and 200 pounds heavier. The small in comparison officer was instructed with the huge task to take Garner down. All the officer did was apply a takedown technique that he learned in the police academy - when Garner resisted arrest.
What happened was the takedown technique was instrumental in triggering Garner’s pre-existing health problems and led to his death, but Garner was not choked to death, Garner did not die of asphyxiation, he died of acute and chronic bronchial asthma, obesity, and heart disease. The takedown hold didn’t kill Garner.
The reason the officer was found not guilty was because the jury thought if Garner had otherwise been healthy, would he have died from use of takedown hold? The obvious answer is no, of course not. The jury found that if Garner did not resist arrest, and was healthy, the outcome of this case would have been very different.
Come on, embarrass me...
Gosh, I don't even know if I should put in the time now.
Saying Trump is the best candidate in the past 50 years pretty much takes the cake in terms of embarrassing yourself, and that's even among covers worst. When Slovak, Hugh and Gimmee have such low opinions of you, I don't know how I could make the situation any worse or how much you could even understand in terms of counter-argumentation (which so far has been little to none).
WTF you going to? Paragraph him to death?
What a fuggin toolbox you are. One day you'll get it.
I'm sure you'd be more than wish me to attempt to use physical force so you could scream bloody murder.
I'll stick with my words as my sword. I've had you on bended knee for years. Why change it now?
WTF you going to? Paragraph him to death?
What a fuggin toolbox you are. One day you'll get it.
I'm sure you'd be more than wish me to attempt to use physical force so you could scream bloody murder.
I'll stick with my words as my sword. I've had you on bended knee for years. Why change it now?
Gosh, I don't even know if I should put in the time now.
Saying Trump is the best candidate in the past 50 years pretty much takes the cake in terms of embarrassing yourself, and that's even among covers worst. When Slovak, Hugh and Gimmee have such low opinions of you, I don't know how I could make the situation any worse or how much you could even understand in terms of counter-argumentation (which so far has been little to none).
There is no reasonable counter argument. If you could’ve constructed a valid and reasonable argument, you would have. Thanks for playing. Checkmate. I should’ve listened to Thomas Paine... “To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.”
Gosh, I don't even know if I should put in the time now.
Saying Trump is the best candidate in the past 50 years pretty much takes the cake in terms of embarrassing yourself, and that's even among covers worst. When Slovak, Hugh and Gimmee have such low opinions of you, I don't know how I could make the situation any worse or how much you could even understand in terms of counter-argumentation (which so far has been little to none).
There is no reasonable counter argument. If you could’ve constructed a valid and reasonable argument, you would have. Thanks for playing. Checkmate. I should’ve listened to Thomas Paine... “To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.”
Ah, as I expected, the ole Mark Twain cop out… “It's better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than open it and remove all doubt.” One of the liberal commandments is avoid arguments you can’t win. I had a feeling this would happen. Liberals usually use the race card before they cower and run away though. You didn’t. That’s the only thing that truly surprised me.
There is no reasonable counter argument. If you could’ve constructed a valid and reasonable argument, you would have. Thanks for playing. Checkmate. I should’ve listened to Thomas Paine... “To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.”
You believe I can't come up with a reasonable counter-argument to what you proposed about Eric Garner's death?
Again, if I didn't see you type those words about Trump, which go beyond qualifying you for the lunatic fringe, I'd argue with you, as I have done for the past 10 years on this site with virtually every bigot imaginable so it proves I'm more than willing.
But what's the point? I'm serious about that.
Again, even those who are among Covers' worst think you're crazy for such a statement about Trump.
Your feet are firmly implanted in wet concrete as it dries.
(And please don't make Thomas Paine roll over in his grave by quoting him).
Ah, as I expected, the ole Mark Twain cop out… “It's better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than open it and remove all doubt.” One of the liberal commandments is avoid arguments you can’t win. I had a feeling this would happen. Liberals usually use the race card before they cower and run away though. You didn’t. That’s the only thing that truly surprised me.
There is no reasonable counter argument. If you could’ve constructed a valid and reasonable argument, you would have. Thanks for playing. Checkmate. I should’ve listened to Thomas Paine... “To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.”
You believe I can't come up with a reasonable counter-argument to what you proposed about Eric Garner's death?
Again, if I didn't see you type those words about Trump, which go beyond qualifying you for the lunatic fringe, I'd argue with you, as I have done for the past 10 years on this site with virtually every bigot imaginable so it proves I'm more than willing.
But what's the point? I'm serious about that.
Again, even those who are among Covers' worst think you're crazy for such a statement about Trump.
Your feet are firmly implanted in wet concrete as it dries.
(And please don't make Thomas Paine roll over in his grave by quoting him).
So a wall on the U.S./Mexico border is a waste of time, huh. I guess the government should eliminate walls and fences from all prisons. You know, since walls and fences are pointless according to you liberals. What Trump is proposing isn’t just a huge wall. He’s proposing a wall, multiple double fence lines, and a massive high tech security perimeter with cameras, sensors, stadium lighting, surveillance towers and drones.
The cost will be paid for by Mexico. The United States gives Mexico on average about 400 million dollars a year in aid. That money could go towards the protection of Americans. If the United States decided to ban travel to Mexico, if Mexico was to revolt against Trumps plans, the Mexican economy would lose about 4 billion dollars in revenue. The United States is in charge, not Mexico.
The US/Canadian border is already getting vamped up. I’m sure Trump would put a similar focus on the Canadian border as well. The bigger threat to Americans comes from Mexico at this time. Not many criminals or terrorists coming from Alaska, Greenland, and Canada.
I’m not going to address the police shooting of the medical care worker at this time. I’m waiting for all the facts and circumstances to come out.
Every police agency in the country wants body cams. The issue every time is funding. I’m best friends with a police chief and a sheriff. It took them 5 years of complaining to get body cameras. It wasn’t until this year when they got cameras for every officer. Now the problem is how long it will last? Both are tasked with a problem to continually fund the program. It’s going to cost thousands to maintain. The plan is to increase drug busts for more cash confiscations and confiscated property.
My solution is simple - comply with officers! I see nothing wrong with the protocols police use. Police use the Use of Force Continuum and the Totality of the Circumstances Standard. The standards come from U.S. Supreme Court rulings. If police do wrong, internal affairs investigates, and police have to answer to a judge and a jury of reasonable peers for what the officer did.
So a wall on the U.S./Mexico border is a waste of time, huh. I guess the government should eliminate walls and fences from all prisons. You know, since walls and fences are pointless according to you liberals. What Trump is proposing isn’t just a huge wall. He’s proposing a wall, multiple double fence lines, and a massive high tech security perimeter with cameras, sensors, stadium lighting, surveillance towers and drones.
The cost will be paid for by Mexico. The United States gives Mexico on average about 400 million dollars a year in aid. That money could go towards the protection of Americans. If the United States decided to ban travel to Mexico, if Mexico was to revolt against Trumps plans, the Mexican economy would lose about 4 billion dollars in revenue. The United States is in charge, not Mexico.
The US/Canadian border is already getting vamped up. I’m sure Trump would put a similar focus on the Canadian border as well. The bigger threat to Americans comes from Mexico at this time. Not many criminals or terrorists coming from Alaska, Greenland, and Canada.
I’m not going to address the police shooting of the medical care worker at this time. I’m waiting for all the facts and circumstances to come out.
Every police agency in the country wants body cams. The issue every time is funding. I’m best friends with a police chief and a sheriff. It took them 5 years of complaining to get body cameras. It wasn’t until this year when they got cameras for every officer. Now the problem is how long it will last? Both are tasked with a problem to continually fund the program. It’s going to cost thousands to maintain. The plan is to increase drug busts for more cash confiscations and confiscated property.
My solution is simple - comply with officers! I see nothing wrong with the protocols police use. Police use the Use of Force Continuum and the Totality of the Circumstances Standard. The standards come from U.S. Supreme Court rulings. If police do wrong, internal affairs investigates, and police have to answer to a judge and a jury of reasonable peers for what the officer did.
The city councils are quick to payout settlements but are penny pinchers when it comes to increased department funding. I’m angered about it. I think cops should be getting paid more and departments should get the DEA’s billion dollar fiscal budget. I agree with you about this.
It’s not happening because of lack of respect. People like the president fuel that disrespect by perpetuating the police brutality false narrative.
Cops are fully exonerated at such a high rate because the video shows no wrong doing. If video evidence didn’t exist, I can’t imagine how long the list would be of cops being falsely convicted, which is exactly why police love cameras. It protects them.
The riots and cop killings start after the democrats and the president and the BLM thug terrorists incite terrorism. The system is fine. The only thing that I agree needs to be fixed is the budget.
The city councils are quick to payout settlements but are penny pinchers when it comes to increased department funding. I’m angered about it. I think cops should be getting paid more and departments should get the DEA’s billion dollar fiscal budget. I agree with you about this.
It’s not happening because of lack of respect. People like the president fuel that disrespect by perpetuating the police brutality false narrative.
Cops are fully exonerated at such a high rate because the video shows no wrong doing. If video evidence didn’t exist, I can’t imagine how long the list would be of cops being falsely convicted, which is exactly why police love cameras. It protects them.
The riots and cop killings start after the democrats and the president and the BLM thug terrorists incite terrorism. The system is fine. The only thing that I agree needs to be fixed is the budget.
You believe I can't come up with a reasonable counter-argument to what you proposed about Eric Garner's death?
Again, if I didn't see you type those words about Trump, which go beyond qualifying you for the lunatic fringe, I'd argue with you, as I have done for the past 10 years on this site with virtually every bigot imaginable so it proves I'm more than willing.
But what's the point? I'm serious about that.
Again, even those who are among Covers' worst think you're crazy for such a statement about Trump.
Your feet are firmly implanted in wet concrete as it dries.
(And please don't make Thomas Paine roll over in his grave by quoting him).
1. Avoid arguments that you can’t win.
2. Claim the high ground to try and save face.
3. When the opponent is winning the argument, pick up on some little point that they made (in this case Trump) or anything else that can distract from the conversation and instead twist the conversation around.
Stop talking about Trump or other posters. I’m not going to fall for those liberal tricks. The topic is Eric Garner's death and you saying that you would embarrass me. I’m still waiting!
You typed out two posts, 8 sentences, and 200 words. If you can “waste time” with that, you could’ve constructed a counter argument in that same amount of time. The reality is that you can't.
You’re the one that challenged me, remember. I took you up on that challenge. Now you’re running from the challenge that YOU presented!
You believe I can't come up with a reasonable counter-argument to what you proposed about Eric Garner's death?
Again, if I didn't see you type those words about Trump, which go beyond qualifying you for the lunatic fringe, I'd argue with you, as I have done for the past 10 years on this site with virtually every bigot imaginable so it proves I'm more than willing.
But what's the point? I'm serious about that.
Again, even those who are among Covers' worst think you're crazy for such a statement about Trump.
Your feet are firmly implanted in wet concrete as it dries.
(And please don't make Thomas Paine roll over in his grave by quoting him).
1. Avoid arguments that you can’t win.
2. Claim the high ground to try and save face.
3. When the opponent is winning the argument, pick up on some little point that they made (in this case Trump) or anything else that can distract from the conversation and instead twist the conversation around.
Stop talking about Trump or other posters. I’m not going to fall for those liberal tricks. The topic is Eric Garner's death and you saying that you would embarrass me. I’m still waiting!
You typed out two posts, 8 sentences, and 200 words. If you can “waste time” with that, you could’ve constructed a counter argument in that same amount of time. The reality is that you can't.
You’re the one that challenged me, remember. I took you up on that challenge. Now you’re running from the challenge that YOU presented!
You are using 3 liberal commandments.
1. Avoid arguments that you can’t win.
2. Claim the high ground to try and save face.
3. When the opponent is winning the argument, pick up on some little point that they made (in this case Trump) or anything else that can distract from the conversation and instead twist the conversation around.
Stop talking about Trump or other posters. I’m not going to fall for those liberal tricks. The topic is Eric Garner's death and you saying that you would embarrass me. I’m still waiting!
You typed out two posts, 8 sentences, and 200 words. If you can “waste time” with that, you could’ve constructed a counter argument in that same amount of time. The reality is that you can't.
You’re the one that challenged me, remember. I took you up on that challenge. Now you’re running from the challenge that YOU presented!
You are using 3 liberal commandments.
1. Avoid arguments that you can’t win.
2. Claim the high ground to try and save face.
3. When the opponent is winning the argument, pick up on some little point that they made (in this case Trump) or anything else that can distract from the conversation and instead twist the conversation around.
Stop talking about Trump or other posters. I’m not going to fall for those liberal tricks. The topic is Eric Garner's death and you saying that you would embarrass me. I’m still waiting!
You typed out two posts, 8 sentences, and 200 words. If you can “waste time” with that, you could’ve constructed a counter argument in that same amount of time. The reality is that you can't.
You’re the one that challenged me, remember. I took you up on that challenge. Now you’re running from the challenge that YOU presented!
Hot Forum Topics
-
Monday 9/14/2026
680
-
I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters
57,671
-
Couple Beers
1,970
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
97,191
-
Trump's legacy?
25,357
-
Week One-Post Week One Plays Here
1,849
-
Betting NFL isnt the same anymore Tapping out.
1,269
-
*** MONDAY NFL ***
5,734
-
We have picked a terrible time to have the stupidest president ever
26,733
-
2026 POW Week 1
322
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
