Posted:
#26
Can you do a little write up on why you think it was such a bad play?
0
YTD: 13-2 (+$6,400)
Posted:
#27
Quote Originally Posted by fxbrassard:
Can you do a little write up on why you think it was such a bad play?
Can you do a little write up on why you think it was such a bad play?
The OVER has only paid off once in the last seven games between the Minnesota Wild and the New York Rangers as those teams hit the ice at Madison Square Garden on Monday.
The Rangers and Wild split their two meetings last season, with New York winning 4-1 at home as a -111 favorite on the NHL odds and Minnesota winning 2-1 at home as -115 chalk. The OVER/UNDER has gone 1-4-2 in their last seven matchups. This was ripe for an OVER since 75% was on UNDER yet there were EVEN money lines out there for the OVER or very minimal plus money. You have to pay attention to the line and its movement.
This stat is the main reason I never would have taken the UNDER :
The total has gone UNDER in 7 of Minnesota's last 8 games.
If you pay attention to trends in NHL, this was the perfect time to go against a total trend.
0
Posted:
#30
Quote Originally Posted by fxbrassard:
You seem to put a lot of stock into past meetings between teams, I must say it seems to work out very well.
You seem to put a lot of stock into past meetings between teams, I must say it seems to work out very well.
You also brought the line movement argument for the Montreal game.I'm not sure I get it. Are you suggesting that the bookies have some kind of inside info?
Not suggesting that at all. What I mean by that is when a high percentage of public money is a side yet the number doesn't signify it, it's a stay away game for me. The yellow light blinks very bright. Just like the Edmonton as I stated Ina previous post
0
Posted:
#33
Quote Originally Posted by Red_Soxxxxxxxx:
Oilers and Canadiens split their two meetings a season ago, with each team winning on the road. Montreal has still lost eight of its past 11 in Edmonton, however.
Quote Originally Posted by WakaFlocka:
Post the game!
No play tonight. I'm not forcing Montreal. Everyone is on them yet the line is still short. The Post the game!
Oilers and Canadiens split their two meetings a season ago, with each team winning on the road. Montreal has still lost eight of its past 11 in Edmonton, however.
See what I mean?
0
Posted:
#35
Quote Originally Posted by Red_Soxxxxxxxx:
Quote Originally Posted by WakaFlocka:
Post the game!
No play tonight. I'm not forcing Montreal. Everyone is on them yet the line is still short. The Oilers and Canadiens split their two meetings a season ago, with each team winning on the road. Montreal has still lost eight of its past 11 in Edmonton, however.Post the game!
Best play of the night was NOT playing my Habs!!! These aren't the 77-78 Habs, lol.
0
Posted:
#36
Quote Originally Posted by Ferrari29:
playing my Habs!!! These aren't the 77-78 Habs, lol.
Quote Originally Posted by
Red_Soxxxxxxxx:
Best play of the night was NOT Red_Soxxxxxxxx:
Quote Originally Posted by WakaFlocka:
Post the game!
No play tonight. I'm not forcing Montreal. Everyone is on them yet the line is still short. The Oilers and Canadiens split their two meetings a season ago, with each team winning on the road. Montreal has still lost eight of its past 11 in Edmonton, however.Post the game!
playing my Habs!!! These aren't the 77-78 Habs, lol.
Agreed Ferrari.
0
i know my team, lol. 
Posted:
#39
Will post a play or two in a bit. Remember, limiting plays is the key to success. Anyone that says that they have been doing this for decades by picking multiple games daily and never lost is leading the sheep to their slaughter and is an outright liar. Don't be misled. Good luck to all
0
Posted:
#41
Quote Originally Posted by Red_Soxxxxxxxx:
Will post a play or two in a bit. Remember, limiting plays is the key to success. Anyone that says that they have been doing this for decades by picking multiple games daily and never lost is leading the sheep to their slaughter and is an outright liar. Don't be misled. Good luck to all
Will post a play or two in a bit. Remember, limiting plays is the key to success. Anyone that says that they have been doing this for decades by picking multiple games daily and never lost is leading the sheep to their slaughter and is an outright liar. Don't be misled. Good luck to all 
0
Posted:
#42
Quote Originally Posted by Red_Soxxxxxxxx:
Will post a play or two in a bit. Remember, limiting plays is the key to success. Anyone that says that they have been doing this for decades by picking multiple games daily and never lost is leading the sheep to their slaughter and is an outright liar. Don't be misled. Good luck to all
Will post a play or two in a bit. Remember, limiting plays is the key to success. Anyone that says that they have been doing this for decades by picking multiple games daily and never lost is leading the sheep to their slaughter and is an outright liar. Don't be misled. Good luck to all
Man Mr.Red Sox please,please,please stick to one game two games is too much one is enough
0
Posted:
#47
The 'Hawks had lost five in a row to the Ducks before winning the final two meetings last season. They have won only once in their past four at home versus Anaheim. Chicago 4-0-1 at home.
This is a small play and I like it so need to take it. Two dogs riding tonight. BOL!
Remember money management. Long season
Aneheim +145....100/145
This is a small play and I like it so need to take it. Two dogs riding tonight. BOL!
Remember money management. Long season
Aneheim +145....100/145
0
Posted:
#48
The 'Hawks had lost five in a row to the Ducks before winning the final two meetings last season. They have won only once in their past four at home versus Anaheim. Chicago 4-0-1 at home.
This is a small play and I like it so need to take it. Two dogs riding tonight. BOL!
Remember money management. Long season
Aneheim +145....100/145
This is a small play and I like it so need to take it. Two dogs riding tonight. BOL!
Remember money management. Long season
Aneheim +145....100/145
0
Posted:
#49
Quote Originally Posted by slew:
Man, from Boston. Will be at game..have to say opposite side.
Man, from Boston. Will be at game..have to say opposite side.
Minny b2b, not sure how they respond after what happened. B's off a few days, starting to find the back of the net...b's for 5 units for me
But gl
I hear you Slew. Tough for me to go against any Boston team but when need be I do. GL and enjoy....
0
Posted:
#50
Quote Originally Posted by Red_Soxxxxxxxx:
Not suggesting that at all. What I mean by that is when a high percentage of public money is a side yet the number doesn't signify it, it's a stay away game for me. The yellow light blinks very bright. Just like the Edmonton as I stated Ina previous post
Where can I find the stats on how much money is being wagered on each side? I have found places that tell me the number of people wagering on games, but not money. Thanks.
0
Hot Forum Topics
