He embellished but that was 10000% a penalty and not enough of a dive for a call on him.....you don't have to get hit directly n the head to have it whip back.
0
He embellished but that was 10000% a penalty and not enough of a dive for a call on him.....you don't have to get hit directly n the head to have it whip back.
He embellished but that was 10000% a penalty and not enough of a dive for a call on him.....you don't have to get hit directly n the head to have it whip back.
Flop is a flop and I know Quick got hit by he is pretty far out to begin with...also, Brown fell to the ice just before that (another flop) on a very light hit trying to draw a call and there was a bunch of similar incidents...the Kings do this at home, its a smart tactic because it works but you dont like to see it in hockey, at least I dont.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DDH420:
He embellished but that was 10000% a penalty and not enough of a dive for a call on him.....you don't have to get hit directly n the head to have it whip back.
Flop is a flop and I know Quick got hit by he is pretty far out to begin with...also, Brown fell to the ice just before that (another flop) on a very light hit trying to draw a call and there was a bunch of similar incidents...the Kings do this at home, its a smart tactic because it works but you dont like to see it in hockey, at least I dont.
quick was way out above the crease....should be taken into consideration
Don't get me wrong I'm not ok with hitting the goalie but a player can't be expected to look out for a goalie out of the crease when he's crashing the net
0
quick was way out above the crease....should be taken into consideration
Don't get me wrong I'm not ok with hitting the goalie but a player can't be expected to look out for a goalie out of the crease when he's crashing the net