Playing around and found this stat (Leafs ML)

Question

May not mean anything, just found this interesting.

Was just playing around and found this, teams playing on a b2b on a Sunday, after 2 wins by 1 goal and favored by at least -180 are 1-7 SU.

When the opponent also is on a b2b, then they're 1-6 SU.

Leafs ML +188

Leafs in regulation +320

SU:	1-7 (-1.25, 12.5%)	avg line: -219.7 / 199.3	on / against: -$1,487 / +$1,343	ROI: -83.7% / +167.9%

theIntrospect · Answer

May not mean anything, just found this interesting.

Was just playing around and found this, teams playing on a b2b on a Sunday, after 2 wins by 1 goal and favored by at least -180 are 1-7 SU.

When the opponent also is on a b2b, then they're 1-6 SU.

Leafs ML +188

Leafs in regulation +320

SU:	1-7 (-1.25, 12.5%)	avg line: -219.7 / 199.3	on / against: -$1,487 / +$1,343	ROI: -83.7% / +167.9%

theIntrospect · Answer

Went smaller since Mrazek is starting.

Hattrick11 · Answer

Wow. Great stat. Although, it doesnt offer any more credence for a toronto play. I dont see detroit offering babcock any respect tonight.

.....and the under 5.5 system play looks suspect.

Going contrarian here big time. Toronto and Over.

Happy Sunday.

theIntrospect · Answer

Thanks man. Good Luck

weeble5672 · Answer

That&#x27;s honestly an arbitrary stat, IMO. We can maneuver numbers any way we want to be able to get some sort of trend to support our picks. Example...Sunday faves of -180 or higher are 13-2 in their last 15.Sunday faves of -180 or higher and off 2 straight wins are 10-0 in their last 10.In other words, it&#x27;s just a trend with no rhyme or reason to it. And what makes your stat even more arbitrary is the fact that the situation not very common. 8 times in the past 10 years to be exact.Just my two cents, is all.

Lippsman · Answer

When the moon is full and I cook pasta on a Sunday I pick 90%

theIntrospect · Answer

Your example stats are very easy to find as you're supporting a -180 line with a victory.

No matter how you query data, it's not so easy to get a 1-7 SU for the team that is favored by at least -180.

theIntrospect · Answer

[Quote: Originally Posted by weeble5672]  That&#x27;s honestly an arbitrary stat, IMO. We can maneuver numbers any way we want to be able to get some sort of trend to support our picks. Example...Sunday faves of -180 or higher are 13-2 in their last 15.Sunday faves of -180 or higher and off 2 straight wins are 10-0 in their last 10.In other words, it&#x27;s just a trend with no rhyme or reason to it. And what makes your stat even more arbitrary is the fact that the situation not very common. 8 times in the past 10 years to be exact.Just my two cents, is all. Your example stats are very easy to find as you&#x27;re supporting a -180 line with a victory.No matter how you query data, it&#x27;s not so easy to get a 1-7 SU for the team that is favored by at least -180.

theIntrospect · Answer

See post #9

theliquidator06 · Answer

LMFAO! I love pasta! I love full moons and I love Sunday!

gabrielmafud · Answer

GOOD PICK !!!

Playing around and found this stat (Leafs ML)

Hot Forum Topics