All Forums | NHL Betting Forum

*** Hawks vs. Quacks Game 5 In-Game ***

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 7566
Posts: 278
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2001
Posts: 85256
Posted: #251
Quote Originally Posted by wheaty :

Ducks have been the better team all night.   And the better team won


I would NOT say "all night". did you watch the 2nd period and end of the 3rd, wheaty?

be interesting to see WHAT happens Wednesday @ Chicago. got a felling the Blackhawks NOT done YET
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2014
Posts: 3152
Posted: #252
Quote Originally Posted by AppleMunch25:

Well the b-hawks had no business sending that game to OT, so poetic justice comes through at the end. Hawks will take game 6 you got to think.


Yea how i feel winining on hawks in Chicago justice came out in the end and it did here as well.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 5248
Posted: #253
they said it would 7 and it will and god help us all in that absolutely sick fest it will be like tonight...has there ever been a series like this????? I hope it's not a fluky goal that ends it..
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 4280
Posted: #254
Quote Originally Posted by AppleMunch25:

Well the b-hawks had no business sending that game to OT, so poetic justice comes through at the end. Hawks will take game 6 you got to think.


Take off the homer glasses you moron.

Ducks were better in the 1st period only, they were outplayed in both the 2nd & 3rd period. You cant hold on to a 3-0 lead on your own ice, theres not poetic justice in that. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2015
Posts: 1081
Posted: #255
Fab, to be continued....on Friday amigo. This is going 7.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 16325
Posted: #256
you guys make me laugh
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 16325
Posted: #257
If it goes 7 it saturday
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 4280
Posted: #258
Quote Originally Posted by fab14:

you guys make me laugh


lol what makes me laugh is how the Flames get dumped every season and you jump on that California bandwagon so quick, last year you were a devout Kings fan in the playoffs, one wasnt around they would think you have been Since Gretzky played. 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 5248
Posted: #259
Ducks were not the better team except early but give them credit for coming right out ready...they could have easily been cold early and dead..didn't hurt to have 20 minutes off, if it was football or baskeball, they might not have been...

This is going 7 and it will be brutal
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 13947
Posted: #260
Quote Originally Posted by LeRinkRat:



I would NOT say "all night". did you watch the 2nd period and end of the 3rd, wheaty?

be interesting to see WHAT happens Wednesday @ Chicago. got a felling the Blackhawks NOT done YET

I was speaking in relative terms. I'm sorry but I don't put much stock into the last two minutes.  Yes, it was played great by the Hawks but they were up a man and it was the last two minutes, ducks were just holding on for dear live and let go.  The ducks dominated for 2 periods 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 5248
Posted: #261
so much for that invaluable 2-2 trend oh by the way...
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 16325
Posted: #262
Quote Originally Posted by bhawksfan:



lol what makes me laugh is how the Flames get dumped every season and you jump on that California bandwagon so quick, last year you were a devout Kings fan in the playoffs, one wasnt around they would think you have been Since Gretzky played. 
The guy that is the biggest homer on this site
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 4280
Posted: #263
Quote Originally Posted by fab14:

The guy that is the biggest homer on this site


Actually if you check my posts I have been fairly objective.

But it would great if you shut your gob, I hate glory hunters. 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2015
Posts: 12902
Posted: #264
Quote Originally Posted by wheaty :


I was speaking in relative terms. I'm sorry but I don't put much stock into the last two minutes.  Yes, it was played great by the Hawks but they were up a man and it was the last two minutes, ducks were just holding on for dear live and let go.  The ducks dominated for 2 periods 

Hey Wheaty- did you figure out what I was saying in my Post?

About the Hawks knowing t hey were down a goal too???

I was following up on what you said, and was adding some more substance to it

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 16325
Posted: #265
I watch alot of hockey in the west these teams in cali are big bad teams & when i see money to be made i will jump on there bandwagon
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 13947
Posted: #266
Quote Originally Posted by Hog_Wild:

Hey Wheaty- did you figure out what I was saying in my Post?

About the Hawks knowing t hey were down a goal too???

I was following up on what you said, and was adding some more substance to it


Yeah I figured it out.  Made a lot more sense than what I thought you meant lol.  I didn't understand wtf you were saying.  Got it now tho.  
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 4280
Posted: #267
Quote Originally Posted by wheaty :


I was speaking in relative terms. I'm sorry but I don't put much stock into the last two minutes.  Yes, it was played great by the Hawks but they were up a man and it was the last two minutes, ducks were just holding on for dear live and let go.  The ducks dominated for 2 periods 


They dominated the 1st, which was the 2nd one? 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2015
Posts: 694
Posted: #268
Quote Originally Posted by bhawksfan:



Take off the homer glasses you moron.

Ducks were better in the 1st period only, they were outplayed in both the 2nd & 3rd period. You cant hold on to a 3-0 lead on your own ice, theres not poetic justice in that. 

orrrrrrrrrrrrrr the fact Chi town could only get 2 and they dominated 2 period, where the ducks domianted 1 and got 3... pretty sure my math tells me the ducks Are the better team, hopefully the Blackhawks don't choke at home, it would be shame to see the most annoying fanbase in hockey crying about something. Plus i will have money on the blackhawks
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 13947
Posted: #269
Quote Originally Posted by bhawksfan:



They dominated the 1st, which was the 2nd one? 

Haha I'm not having this conversation with you.  You aren't gonna be objective.  Congrats on the almost comeback and bol in game 6
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2001
Posts: 23161
Posted: #270
Quote Originally Posted by AppleMunch25:


orrrrrrrrrrrrrr the fact Chi town could only get 2 and they dominated 2 period, where the ducks domianted 1 and got 3... pretty sure my math tells me the ducks Are the better team, hopefully the Blackhawks don't choke at home, it would be shame to see the most annoying fanbase in hockey crying about something. Plus i will have money on the blackhawks


    you're funny
Spottie2935 on socials
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 4280
Posted: #271
Quote Originally Posted by wheaty :


Haha I'm not having this conversation with you.  You aren't gonna be objective.  Congrats on the almost comeback and bol in game 6


Outscored, outchanced, outshot the Ducks, in both the 2nd & 3rd. those are facts. That should be objective enough for you....
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2014
Posts: 6186
Posted: #272
Quote Originally Posted by AppleMunch25:


orrrrrrrrrrrrrr the fact Chi town could only get 2 and they dominated 2 period, where the ducks domianted 1 and got 3... pretty sure my math tells me the ducks Are the better team, hopefully the Blackhawks don't choke at home, it would be shame to see the most annoying fanbase in hockey crying about something. Plus i will have money on the blackhawks
I didnt know the Habs or Bruins were still in the playoffs lol 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 13947
Posted: #273
Quote Originally Posted by bhawksfan:



Outscored, outchanced, outshot the Ducks, in both the 2nd & 3rd. those are facts. That should be objective enough for you....

I can look at box scores and come in here and completely disregard the game.... Oh wait, you have that on lock down 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 4280
Posted: #274
Quote Originally Posted by wheaty :


I can look at box scores and come in here and completely disregard the game.... Oh wait, you have that on lock down 


If you think the Ducks "dominated' any period besides the 1st in this game, you need to check yourself into an asylum. I could live with you thinking they were "even" in the 3rd, but to say dominated is beyond laughable.

Any objective person in here will back me up on this, the Ducks only dominated the 1st period. 
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 13947
Posted: #275
the hawks played the third period like a virgin having sex for the first time.  They fukked around for 18 minutes, finally put it in and blew their load in 2 minutes.... And then couldn't finish the deal.  

Go back to your box scores homer 
All Forums | NHL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.