Posted:
#26
Quote Originally Posted by DNI:
Quote Originally Posted by Lippsman:
would anyone have thought Vancouver up 3:0 would go to OT? Did you think that Mr. Lippsman? Quote Originally Posted by DNI:
As I have posted in other threads, if you did any research you would of seen the last game they played a little over 3 weeks had the exact same score and went to OT.Hello Lippsman,I did see that, but those are independent events of one another. I tend to put more weight into recent form and that's why I wagered that the game wouldn't end in overtime.
If you ignore history you will be defeated by it.As I have posted in other threads, if you did any research you would of seen the last game they played a little over 3 weeks had the exact same score and went to OT.Hello Lippsman,I did see that, but those are independent events of one another. I tend to put more weight into recent form and that's why I wagered that the game wouldn't end in overtime.
I did.
If Vancouver can score 3 unanswered goals, there's no reason ottowa can't.
Big come backs are almost a daily occurrence in NHL but people like you DNI don't accept that and instead contribute it to "bad beats".
If bad beats are happening every day on high juice plays for you, they aren't bad beats, it's a result of poor handicapping.
0
Hot Forum Topics
