@zircon Lol. You talk about transparency? I guess you could have been forthright and said that in your CBB thread.
Ok that's fair. I just posted my picks and didn't even think I needed to announce these were my first picks in the CBB forum. Simple misunderstanding. So going forward I will remember to do so in other sports subs.
Good fortunes with your bets this weekend.
3
Quote Originally Posted by wmi799:
@zircon Lol. You talk about transparency? I guess you could have been forthright and said that in your CBB thread.
Ok that's fair. I just posted my picks and didn't even think I needed to announce these were my first picks in the CBB forum. Simple misunderstanding. So going forward I will remember to do so in other sports subs.
Quote Originally Posted by zircon: One winning NFL bettor here posts his w/l record but refuses to show his units. I hate when they refuse to show their units.
W/L record plus net units is fundamental for a reasonable assessment of handicapping skill.
Fubah2 wasn't listing them both. Only his w/l. Most of his bets are heavy into chalk so each of his losses could be double or triple a standard ATS bet loss! That's the problem. His posted w/l is accurate and looks pretty but not so fast my friend!It is misleading because of those 38 chalk losses. For all we know he might have a net losing units record from too many huge ML favorites! So I researched his unit losses and an hour ago posted those documented results to his only thread. To be fair I don't know if he was concealing the results or just enjoyed emphasizing his w/l
5
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
Quote Originally Posted by zircon: One winning NFL bettor here posts his w/l record but refuses to show his units. I hate when they refuse to show their units.
W/L record plus net units is fundamental for a reasonable assessment of handicapping skill.
Fubah2 wasn't listing them both. Only his w/l. Most of his bets are heavy into chalk so each of his losses could be double or triple a standard ATS bet loss! That's the problem. His posted w/l is accurate and looks pretty but not so fast my friend!It is misleading because of those 38 chalk losses. For all we know he might have a net losing units record from too many huge ML favorites! So I researched his unit losses and an hour ago posted those documented results to his only thread. To be fair I don't know if he was concealing the results or just enjoyed emphasizing his w/l
W/L record plus net units is fundamental for a reasonable assessment of handicapping skill. Fubah2 wasn't listing them both. Only his w/l. Most of his bets are heavy into chalk so each of his losses could be double or triple a standard ATS bet loss! That's the problem. His posted w/l is accurate and looks pretty but not so fast my friend! It is misleading because of those 38 chalk losses. For all we know he might have a net losing units record from too many huge ML favorites! So I researched his unit losses and an hour ago posted those documented results to his only thread. To be fair I don't know if he was concealing the results or just enjoyed emphasizing his w/l
Ok, so I was a bit lackadaisical. So what? With all due respect, I recapped my wins and losses every week in a concise format for all to see and they are archived all in one thread for Covers member convenience, so anyone could easily find what they were looking for if it was important to them.
1
Quote Originally Posted by zircon:
W/L record plus net units is fundamental for a reasonable assessment of handicapping skill. Fubah2 wasn't listing them both. Only his w/l. Most of his bets are heavy into chalk so each of his losses could be double or triple a standard ATS bet loss! That's the problem. His posted w/l is accurate and looks pretty but not so fast my friend! It is misleading because of those 38 chalk losses. For all we know he might have a net losing units record from too many huge ML favorites! So I researched his unit losses and an hour ago posted those documented results to his only thread. To be fair I don't know if he was concealing the results or just enjoyed emphasizing his w/l
Ok, so I was a bit lackadaisical. So what? With all due respect, I recapped my wins and losses every week in a concise format for all to see and they are archived all in one thread for Covers member convenience, so anyone could easily find what they were looking for if it was important to them.
Quote Originally Posted by zircon: W/L record plus net units is fundamental for a reasonable assessment of handicapping skill. Fubah2 wasn't listing them both. Only his w/l. Most of his bets are heavy into chalk so each of his losses could be double or triple a standard ATS bet loss! That's the problem. His posted w/l is accurate and looks pretty but not so fast my friend! It is misleading because of those 38 chalk losses. For all we know he might have a net losing units record from too many huge ML favorites! So I researched his unit losses and an hour ago posted those documented results to his only thread. To be fair I don't know if he was concealing the results or just enjoyed emphasizing his w/l
Ok, so I was a bit lackadaisical. So what? With all due respect, I recapped my wins and losses every week in a concise format for all to see and they are archived all in one thread for Covers member convenience, so anyone could easily find what they were looking for if it was important to them.
I will add chalk results to my recaps from now on to avoid issues
1
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by zircon: W/L record plus net units is fundamental for a reasonable assessment of handicapping skill. Fubah2 wasn't listing them both. Only his w/l. Most of his bets are heavy into chalk so each of his losses could be double or triple a standard ATS bet loss! That's the problem. His posted w/l is accurate and looks pretty but not so fast my friend! It is misleading because of those 38 chalk losses. For all we know he might have a net losing units record from too many huge ML favorites! So I researched his unit losses and an hour ago posted those documented results to his only thread. To be fair I don't know if he was concealing the results or just enjoyed emphasizing his w/l
Ok, so I was a bit lackadaisical. So what? With all due respect, I recapped my wins and losses every week in a concise format for all to see and they are archived all in one thread for Covers member convenience, so anyone could easily find what they were looking for if it was important to them.
I will add chalk results to my recaps from now on to avoid issues