Trends & Things 2007-2008 NFL Week 2
You may be thinking – that’s all well and good, but what do we actually DO on Sunday to make a profit based on this information. Since the chances are pretty good that underdogs will go approximately 9-16 over the next two weeks, you’ll want to jump on moneylines of +151 or higher (the break even point for 40 percent is +150). Just to be on the safe side, however, you should stack the deck in your favor and pick out a more profitable range.
Since you’ve made it this far, we’ve got one for you. Here’s our system of the week:
Weeks 2 and 3, NFL underdogs of +190 to +280 (home or away)
This group went a very profitable 14-19 (42 percent) in 2003-2006. A simple $100 wager on each of these games would’ve made you $1,390, or an average of $347.50 per season. Not too shabby for two weeks. And since – as we illustrated – underdogs are even more due over the next two weeks this season than in the past – this year's results could be even better. If next week winds up being a big one for this range (surpassing 42 percent), you'll want to stand down in Week 3. The correction will have already taken place, and Week 3 may average out in the wrong direction.
As of Tuesday night, it appears moneylines for the Browns, Titans, Texans, Dolphins, Chargers and Redskins COULD fall into that range this week, depending on which way the lines move. Of course you’ll want to use the lines on the day of the game to determine which team qualifies. It wouldn’t surprise us to see several of those teams win outright.
You may be thinking – that’s all well and good, but what do we actually DO on Sunday to make a profit based on this information. Since the chances are pretty good that underdogs will go approximately 9-16 over the next two weeks, you’ll want to jump on moneylines of +151 or higher (the break even point for 40 percent is +150). Just to be on the safe side, however, you should stack the deck in your favor and pick out a more profitable range.
Since you’ve made it this far, we’ve got one for you. Here’s our system of the week:
Weeks 2 and 3, NFL underdogs of +190 to +280 (home or away)
This group went a very profitable 14-19 (42 percent) in 2003-2006. A simple $100 wager on each of these games would’ve made you $1,390, or an average of $347.50 per season. Not too shabby for two weeks. And since – as we illustrated – underdogs are even more due over the next two weeks this season than in the past – this year's results could be even better. If next week winds up being a big one for this range (surpassing 42 percent), you'll want to stand down in Week 3. The correction will have already taken place, and Week 3 may average out in the wrong direction.
As of Tuesday night, it appears moneylines for the Browns, Titans, Texans, Dolphins, Chargers and Redskins COULD fall into that range this week, depending on which way the lines move. Of course you’ll want to use the lines on the day of the game to determine which team qualifies. It wouldn’t surprise us to see several of those teams win outright.
From the seattle chart, it definately makes me want to take the over. Mainly because when Seattle is a road favorite against arizona the over is 4-1, which is also more than half of the overs against the NFC west which is 7-5 (3-4 w/o arizona)...
is that enough to put money on the over?
From the seattle chart, it definately makes me want to take the over. Mainly because when Seattle is a road favorite against arizona the over is 4-1, which is also more than half of the overs against the NFC west which is 7-5 (3-4 w/o arizona)...
is that enough to put money on the over?
From the seattle chart, it definately makes me want to take the over. Mainly because when Seattle is a road favorite against arizona the over is 4-1, which is also more than half of the overs against the NFC west which is 7-5 (3-4 w/o arizona)...
is that enough to put money on the over?
look at their O/U record in the month of Sept - not good
From the seattle chart, it definately makes me want to take the over. Mainly because when Seattle is a road favorite against arizona the over is 4-1, which is also more than half of the overs against the NFC west which is 7-5 (3-4 w/o arizona)...
is that enough to put money on the over?
look at their O/U record in the month of Sept - not good
Hot Forum Topics
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
