Posted:
#26
Houston is truly a complete joke! 
0
*** Smell What the ROC is Cooking ***
Posted:
#34
Quote Originally Posted by WussieMan:
HOUSTON #1DEE -10(-110)
YOU AND YOU AND YOU AGAIN would have to be a total idiot to FADE the #1 D in the game vs the worst team in the game in their house. One of these teams is not like the other, one of these teams is not quite the same.. Yeah, i went Sesame st on you slow pokes, dont care about it being a divison game in this instance because this is BLOWOUT of the week. Houston off an embarrassing RAIDERS lose now gets to lick chops and punish Jacksonville whom.bettors are now giving the benefit of a doubt??.. darn IS WRONG with u people??.. ID lay 14.5 here and call it value. Explain to me HOW the Jags score again??.. Ill wait. A meager 27 gets the cover here lol, doubt im.asking too much of Case with that LOW figure..
Isn't this the same argument you made last week when you bet Houston? I agree they should kill the Jags but sometimes a team is snakebitten for the entire year and that's what is going on with Houston. We both know they are better then their record but when a team packs it in it is hard to bet them,let alone lay double digits. Texans will not see my money as a fav this season and probably won't see my money at all. GL Brother but this team has quitHOUSTON #1DEE -10(-110)
YOU AND YOU AND YOU AGAIN would have to be a total idiot to FADE the #1 D in the game vs the worst team in the game in their house. One of these teams is not like the other, one of these teams is not quite the same.. Yeah, i went Sesame st on you slow pokes, dont care about it being a divison game in this instance because this is BLOWOUT of the week. Houston off an embarrassing RAIDERS lose now gets to lick chops and punish Jacksonville whom.bettors are now giving the benefit of a doubt??.. darn IS WRONG with u people??.. ID lay 14.5 here and call it value. Explain to me HOW the Jags score again??.. Ill wait. A meager 27 gets the cover here lol, doubt im.asking too much of Case with that LOW figure..
0
Posted:
#35
Bet them last wk really because of scheduling. They are on a 3 game homestand and thought they'd win one for the gipper since he was returning. This wk on them because next week Brady comes to town and so this is really their only chance for a win imo. I undersrand your point, just explaining mine. GL with whomever you choose this wkend as long as im not on the other side lol
0
Posted:
#43
Matt McGloin +1(-110)
Obviously an upgrade over Richard Pryor in the td/int ratio, and it only took this no name a game to complete this feat. Vertical passing wins games the NFL, refs love the fly boys. Keeps our attention. Besides, loser ass Fitz is on the other dammit side. lol.. Dont take much to beat his ass. Sheit, i get a point at home vs a buffalo reject that finds ways to lose? Sign me up!!
Obviously an upgrade over Richard Pryor in the td/int ratio, and it only took this no name a game to complete this feat. Vertical passing wins games the NFL, refs love the fly boys. Keeps our attention. Besides, loser ass Fitz is on the other dammit side. lol.. Dont take much to beat his ass. Sheit, i get a point at home vs a buffalo reject that finds ways to lose? Sign me up!!
0
Posted:
#44
Quote Originally Posted by WussieMan:
34-36
Cleveland Mutts -2.5(-110)
I like everything about thus team because you DONT. Love the fact they are off a blowout loss, and Pitt a win vs a team most see as a NFC north power. Like that the dawgs lost on the road while Pitt won at home. Yet both stand in the cellar at 4-6. Preception vs reality 101. Mirror records, yet thats where they're likeness ends. I get the better team at home of a blowout vs an average divisional rival in the mist of a mediocore yr. Dawgs SUPERBOWL imo. Sign me up. Dawgs D is 7th vs the pass and 4th vs the run, none of these things the shitty Steelers do well...
back later...
as always...
(corn)
34-36
Cleveland Mutts -2.5(-110)
I like everything about thus team because you DONT. Love the fact they are off a blowout loss, and Pitt a win vs a team most see as a NFC north power. Like that the dawgs lost on the road while Pitt won at home. Yet both stand in the cellar at 4-6. Preception vs reality 101. Mirror records, yet thats where they're likeness ends. I get the better team at home of a blowout vs an average divisional rival in the mist of a mediocore yr. Dawgs SUPERBOWL imo. Sign me up. Dawgs D is 7th vs the pass and 4th vs the run, none of these things the shitty Steelers do well...
back later...
as always...
(corn)
hope your right, big fan, but after they gave it away last week I dont trust this team at all. Two blocked punts in game last week and in total control up 13-0. Not only did they lose the game, they failed to cover. This team is so inconsistent. Defense has been great, Haden is lock-down, the problem is they will find ways to lose, maybe this week they will have 3 FGs blocked for TDs.
0
Posted:
#45
Quote Originally Posted by WussieMan:
HOUSTON #1DEE -10(-110)
YOU AND YOU AND YOU AGAIN would have to be a total idiot to FADE the #1 D in the game vs the worst team in the game in their house. One of these teams is not like the other, one of these teams is not quite the same.. Yeah, i went Sesame st on you slow pokes, dont care about it being a divison game in this instance because this is BLOWOUT of the week. Houston off an embarrassing RAIDERS lose now gets to lick chops and punish Jacksonville whom.bettors are now giving the benefit of a doubt??.. darn IS WRONG with u people??.. ID lay 14.5 here and call it value. Explain to me HOW the Jags score again??.. Ill wait. A meager 27 gets the cover here lol, doubt im.asking too much of Case with that LOW figure..
HOUSTON #1DEE -10(-110)
YOU AND YOU AND YOU AGAIN would have to be a total idiot to FADE the #1 D in the game vs the worst team in the game in their house. One of these teams is not like the other, one of these teams is not quite the same.. Yeah, i went Sesame st on you slow pokes, dont care about it being a divison game in this instance because this is BLOWOUT of the week. Houston off an embarrassing RAIDERS lose now gets to lick chops and punish Jacksonville whom.bettors are now giving the benefit of a doubt??.. darn IS WRONG with u people??.. ID lay 14.5 here and call it value. Explain to me HOW the Jags score again??.. Ill wait. A meager 27 gets the cover here lol, doubt im.asking too much of Case with that LOW figure..
I agree much better team, my ONLY question with Houston is, do they really want to win. The incentive is too lose in leagues where your draft order is determined by your prior year record. NO INCENTIVE for this team to win. They almost play to lose. On paper, I agree, way better team, but its not happening week to week for them.....
0
SMALL UNIT COWBOYS 
Posted:
#47
Quote Originally Posted by WussieMan:
Matt McGloin +1(-110)
Obviously an upgrade over Richard Pryor in the td/int ratio, and it only took this no name a game to complete this feat. Vertical passing wins games the NFL, refs love the fly boys. Keeps our attention. Besides, loser behind Fitz is on the other dammit side. lol.. Dont take much to beat his behind. Sheit, i get a point at home vs a buffalo reject that finds ways to lose? Sign me up!!
Matt McGloin +1(-110)
Obviously an upgrade over Richard Pryor in the td/int ratio, and it only took this no name a game to complete this feat. Vertical passing wins games the NFL, refs love the fly boys. Keeps our attention. Besides, loser behind Fitz is on the other dammit side. lol.. Dont take much to beat his behind. Sheit, i get a point at home vs a buffalo reject that finds ways to lose? Sign me up!!
- The storms will come, the storms will pass -
0
I wish you luck and we both love the Browns. The weather might be a factor if the winds appear in snowy and cold Cleveland? 
Hot Forum Topics
