Posted:
#51
On my way to monitor a spelling bee.
Maybe we'll talk later.
0
Sharps are hammering New England ML already, squares will soon follow.
Posted:
#54
Quote Originally Posted by earthWake:
Name the best defense the patriots faced this year.
Name the good games the Patriots played this year that weren't at home.
I'll wait.
The Patriots do nothing but run 3-4-5 yard outs to Edleman and Gronk on the seem route. I just don't know for the life of me how teams don't stop them. Not surprising the teams that do the best vs NE are in the division and know what they run. Give Carroll 2 weeks to prepare with the best secondary of the last 10 years and we will see what happens. 
Run along junior, you just proved you know nothing about the NFL. The Patriots played the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th ranked defenses this year.
0
Posted:
#55
Quote Originally Posted by mbialowas:
Run along junior, you just proved you know nothing about the NFL. The Patriots played the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th ranked defenses this year.
My point was the best defense they played. The Chiefs they did absolutely nothing. The lions have a solid defense. Against the run, which doesn't matter much vs Tom Brady. The game against the Bills they had 13 first half points until they ran up the score. Notice how you say nothing about them playing well only at home. They own the Colts and that was their only good road win
I'm sorry that you will be backing the Patriots next week. I'm sure the best secondary of the last 10 years will have trouble stopping 4-5 yard passes. Since you know so much more about football, I'll be waiting on the edge of my seat for you to name a secondary better than the Hawks have this year.
0
Posted:
#56
Quote Originally Posted by earthWake:
My point was the best defense they played. The Chiefs they did absolutely nothing. The lions have a solid defense. Against the run, which doesn't matter much vs Tom Brady. The game against the Bills they had 13 first half points until they ran up the score. Notice how you say nothing about them playing well only at home. They own the Colts and that was their only good road win
I'm sorry that you will be backing the Patriots next week. I'm sure the best secondary of the last 10 years will have trouble stopping 4-5 yard passes. Since you know so much more about football, I'll be waiting on the edge of my seat for you to name a secondary better than the Hawks have this year.
Calm the fuckk down junior. When did I say I was backing the Pats
All I was stating was NE played the 2,3,4 ranked defenses and KC isnt one of them you cuntt. Who you got in the big game you fuggin pigeon? I love fading mushes like you
All I was stating was NE played the 2,3,4 ranked defenses and KC isnt one of them you cuntt. Who you got in the big game you fuggin pigeon? I love fading mushes like you0
Posted:
#57
Quote Originally Posted by mbialowas:
Calm the fuckk down junior. When did I say I was backing the Pats All I was stating was NE played the 2,3,4 ranked defenses and KC isnt one of them you cuntt. Who you got in the big game you fuggin pigeon? I love fading mushes like you
All I was stating was NE played the 2,3,4 ranked defenses and KC isnt one of them you cuntt. Who you got in the big game you fuggin pigeon? I love fading mushes like youWell, considering KC is the 2nd ranked defense and the Patriots played them, excuse me for putting 2 and 2 together. You could have faded me all year in my Dolphins thread that ended with me +30 units. Easily could have been 70 units if a few plays go different such is life. If you really want me to I will dig up all of Glydes69 thread from last seasons ( the only thread I really post in) playoffs where I killed the playoffs last year. I won't mention the 100u season I had all posted here on covers in 2012.
Heres my post in Glydes thread before the Superbowl:
Rolling for 3 weeks in a row with Russell Wilson no ints (+120) and under passing yards for the Seahawks opponent.
I think this one is going to be a nail-biter, but think Seahawks pull it out. I truly hope the Seahawks are down 4 with 3 minutes left, and the ball at the 20 yard line. That is the definition of Russell Wilson time.
Win or lose, after this game people will finally give the Seahawks secondary the props it deserves. I've watched a lot of football in the last 15 years, and I can't believe more people are not in awe of the Seahawks secondary. I personally have never, ever seen a better one in my lifetime.
Goodluck man, 23-17 Seahawks IMO
Fade away man. I'm a huge mush. 
0
Posted:
#59
sigh, another person pretending to know what other people are betting on
i'm just going to assume you don't run a large betting operation, that means you don't have a clue what "sharps are betting on" since you probably don't know who the sharps are and what they are betting on.
Just give your opinion of the game and stfu
Pats large imo
i'm just going to assume you don't run a large betting operation, that means you don't have a clue what "sharps are betting on" since you probably don't know who the sharps are and what they are betting on.
Just give your opinion of the game and stfu
Pats large imo
0
keep it up you'll get there. 
Posted:
#62
I'm far from being a sharp but I won money this year.
My final bet is Pats ML for 4 units. I just can't see Brady lose another SB. And I believe Pats are a better team, simply as that, no overthinking for me.
That game between Seattle and Green Bay kind of remind me Game 6 between Spurs and Miami. I just think Green Bay will win next year just like Spurs did.
0
Posted:
#64
Quote Originally Posted by motowner:
Update:
Books continue getting hammered by Pats money. It'll be 80-85% by kick off.
All major outlets are all over this story now.
Funny thing is, I told everyone 8 days ago this was going to happen.
Update:
Books continue getting hammered by Pats money. It'll be 80-85% by kick off.
All major outlets are all over this story now.
Funny thing is, I told everyone 8 days ago this was going to happen.
That's why I jumped on New England early at
M/L + 130.
Helping Kama'aina to beat their " Local " since 1994.
0
Posted:
#69
Quote Originally Posted by motowner:
Vegas will be facing at least 65% New England money by kick off.
They will need Seattle in the largest way possible.
Vegas will be facing at least 65% New England money by kick off.
They will need Seattle in the largest way possible.
GET OFF THIS KICK THAT VEGAS NEEDS ONE SIDE OR THE OTHER "IN THE LARGEST WAY POSSIBLE".
OR WHAT? THEY'LL CRUMBLE IF THEY DON'T GET IT?
SPORTS BETTING IS ONLY 1% OF VEGAS' REVENUE.
THEY DON'T "NEED" ANYTHING.
0
Posted:
#73
Don't be too overconfident in Sea, they have shown they can be beat. The fact that the Pats is saying nothing but great things about Sea doesn't sit well for me if I was backing Sea...even Kraft is getting in it too. How is this correlates? The Pats are preparing like they were the underdog in this game. Pats in general as an underdog is always $$.
0
Posted:
#74
Quote Originally Posted by motowner:
You're a complete and utter imbecile who doesn't understand how sports betting works.
Let me give you a quick lesson son. Anytime Tom Brady is +ML when a line opens, sharps absolutely unload on it. And then factor in Belichick with 2 weeks to prepare, and it quickly becomes a max bet for sharps.. a solid 10-15% of their bankroll play.
And that's why the market absolutely crashed on Seattle in the matter of minutes.
Let me guess, you think the line actually moved towards NE because of square broke losers like yourself and your $5 bets on NE moved it?
Don't post again in my thread.
You nor ANYONE else knows who is on ANYBODY. Stop telling us you do, cause you don't. NO ONE knows how Vegas moves their lines. Do you think if they receive A LOT of money towards NE, you think that they move the line that way??? Just because money is on one side. DOESN'T MEAN THEY MOVE THE LINE WITH THE SIDE THEY ARE GETTING MONEY ON. You understand. NO ONE KNOWS HOW VEGAS WORKS THEIR LINES.
You're a complete and utter imbecile who doesn't understand how sports betting works.
Let me give you a quick lesson son. Anytime Tom Brady is +ML when a line opens, sharps absolutely unload on it. And then factor in Belichick with 2 weeks to prepare, and it quickly becomes a max bet for sharps.. a solid 10-15% of their bankroll play.
And that's why the market absolutely crashed on Seattle in the matter of minutes.
Let me guess, you think the line actually moved towards NE because of square broke losers like yourself and your $5 bets on NE moved it?
Don't post again in my thread.
0
Hot Forum Topics
