Sharps are hammering New England ML already, squares will soon follow.

Vegas will be facing at least 65% New England money by kick off.

They will need Seattle in the largest way possible.

And you know any of them so call "sharp" to begin with ?

Sharps???Lol..Seatle maybe

got seattle at +3 (+120) during first half of pats game. Also got seattle +700 to win the super bowl when they were down 19-7

but after watching that pats game, I dont know how I feel about either bet now

No sharps are betting the night of Championships. Don't fall for this. I am on New England but this guy is a Seahawks backer.

sorry Hawks -3 *

Sharps pounded Denver last year at open, good luck sharps.............................

You're a complete and utter imbecile who doesn't understand how sports betting works.

Let me give you a quick lesson son. Anytime Tom Brady is +ML when a line opens, sharps absolutely unload on it. And then factor in Belichick with 2 weeks to prepare, and it quickly becomes a max bet for sharps.. a solid 10-15% of their bankroll play.

And that's why the market absolutely crashed on Seattle in the matter of minutes.

Let me guess, you think the line actually moved towards NE because of square broke losers like yourself and your $5 bets on NE moved it?

Don't post again in my thread.

I'm sorry, isn't Motown referring to Detroit? One of the poorest garbage-holes in America? Keep reppin.

garbage = sh1t

His mama is a sharp

Public was all over denver last superbowl and look what happened. Early movement went toward denver. Will brady lose the same amount of superbowls as win? Maybe. To me seattle will win this one because of their defense. Just like last year i will be on seattle big. Pats are no slouch but brady will have big problems again the seattle secondary. Brady goes 3-3 in superbowls

cmon man this one is easy seahawks are winning this… 2 super bowls in a row for the seahawks and we will begin to talk about a dynasty team. but first they must get past the a team who once was a dynasty themselves. see where this story line is going???

Well, the +700 was certainly a great value play.

But why would you have essentially doubled-up on Seattle for almost one-seventh of that value when NE was playing? Makes zero sense.

Suppose you could always buy out of that -3 now and just hedge in-play during the SB with your +700.

Last year line opened at Hawks -1 and quickly went to Denver -3. Same outcome, different year.

at thinking Tom Brady is unbeatable.

The MGM took a six-figure wager on New England minus-1 on Sunday night, according to vice president of race and sports Jay Rood.

Gee, I'm so shocked!!! Except that I explained that an hour ago.

Some of the imbeciles around here just make me laugh.

They think it was their $5 broke bets on NE that moved the line.

the line movement last year was a setup so sharps could get seahawks +3

the line opened at sea -1 so the move to -1 wasnt that big of a deal

this line went from -3 to pk is 30 minutes. you are delusional if you think that was just the public

@PayneInsider  ·  3h 3 hours ago

Exactly what I've been saying for over an hour now.

Yet some of the imbeciles here think their $5 McDonalds money bets on NE moved the line.

Pats were 2.5/3 favorite in 2012. Public was big on Giants and Giants won straight up. Vegas gotta be careful

Patriots are 1-5-1 ATS in Super Bowl. Their only win was when they were 14 point dogs to Rams. Pushed when they lost to GB.

Like how vegas need one of tha dogs to win today Cuz of all tha teasers and ml par LMAO!! Jus stopstop

NE wins.