Quote Originally Posted by SportsIntuition: Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999: Quote Originally Posted by SportsIntuition: Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999: Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo: welcome back. do you see any value in this query? season>=2023 and PO=1 and surface=grass and week=19 (0-12) Under the total by 8.2 pts We've agreed to disagree before....I don't like queries with two years of data....if it works for you, go for it,...make a million.... Team A is playing Team B...Team A is 12-0 ATS last 2 years in a situationTeam B is 19-6 ATS last 20 years in a similar situationBased on what you are saying you would pass on the game, or take Team B because their trend contains 20 years of data, correct?Just trying to wrap my head around why you would look through a 12-0 trend over 2 years. I am not here to argue what I think is relevant and what isn't.....if you resonate with I put out, use it if you think if it is advantageous......if you don't, disregard or fade. "Reality can be beaten with enough imagination.".......Mark Twain There is no argument, simply trying to understand your logic, because given the scenario I presented I'm hitting the 12-0 trend 100% of the time until it fails.Again, uncovering early and riding the wave until it fails is where the big money is made. As I've said, I am not debating with you on your logic, and you are also not convincing me that I would consider playing this myself......let it go. In actuality your angle is 6-0 as you are counting both the home and road team in the same game. 14) A team that has an average covering margin of at least 3 points/game season-to-date. a) Home teams on Sunday....7-16 ATS (-4.48), 10-13 straight up (+0.52)...VERSUS Jags, Pats b) Road teams on Saturday...8-7-2 ATS (+1.97), 10-7 (+0.94)....Rams
I posed the hypothetical setup simply using 12-0 ATS taken from the trend from the op you replied to, but not the trend itself.
Simply trying to understand the logic of passing on any trend that is 12-0 ATS over the last 2 years when there are no opposing trends that are as strong.
And there is no debate and never was, simply a question, but good luck.
1
Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999:
Quote Originally Posted by SportsIntuition: Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999: Quote Originally Posted by SportsIntuition: Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999: Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo: welcome back. do you see any value in this query? season>=2023 and PO=1 and surface=grass and week=19 (0-12) Under the total by 8.2 pts We've agreed to disagree before....I don't like queries with two years of data....if it works for you, go for it,...make a million.... Team A is playing Team B...Team A is 12-0 ATS last 2 years in a situationTeam B is 19-6 ATS last 20 years in a similar situationBased on what you are saying you would pass on the game, or take Team B because their trend contains 20 years of data, correct?Just trying to wrap my head around why you would look through a 12-0 trend over 2 years. I am not here to argue what I think is relevant and what isn't.....if you resonate with I put out, use it if you think if it is advantageous......if you don't, disregard or fade. "Reality can be beaten with enough imagination.".......Mark Twain There is no argument, simply trying to understand your logic, because given the scenario I presented I'm hitting the 12-0 trend 100% of the time until it fails.Again, uncovering early and riding the wave until it fails is where the big money is made. As I've said, I am not debating with you on your logic, and you are also not convincing me that I would consider playing this myself......let it go. In actuality your angle is 6-0 as you are counting both the home and road team in the same game. 14) A team that has an average covering margin of at least 3 points/game season-to-date. a) Home teams on Sunday....7-16 ATS (-4.48), 10-13 straight up (+0.52)...VERSUS Jags, Pats b) Road teams on Saturday...8-7-2 ATS (+1.97), 10-7 (+0.94)....Rams
I posed the hypothetical setup simply using 12-0 ATS taken from the trend from the op you replied to, but not the trend itself.
Simply trying to understand the logic of passing on any trend that is 12-0 ATS over the last 2 years when there are no opposing trends that are as strong.
And there is no debate and never was, simply a question, but good luck.
15) game type=WC and streak>3 and A.....11-5-1 ATS.....ON Texans.....this is 8-0-1 on Sunday, 7-2 SU (+8.3), with no historical results for a Monday game.
Time is getting short....good fortune to all.
Blessings,
Indigo
"Like sands through the hour glass, so it is with the days of our lives."
The soap opera Days of Our Lives
1
@over-dosed
Bertrand Russell is the originator.
15) game type=WC and streak>3 and A.....11-5-1 ATS.....ON Texans.....this is 8-0-1 on Sunday, 7-2 SU (+8.3), with no historical results for a Monday game.
Time is getting short....good fortune to all.
Blessings,
Indigo
"Like sands through the hour glass, so it is with the days of our lives."
@over-dosed Bertrand Russell is the originator. 15) game type=WC and streak>3 and A.....11-5-1 ATS.....ON Texans.....this is 8-0-1 on Sunday, 7-2 SU (+8.3), with no historical results for a Monday game. Time is getting short....good fortune to all. Blessings, Indigo "Like sands through the hour glass, so it is with the days of our lives." The soap opera Days of Our Lives
Nice UN with that at 4-13
0
Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999:
@over-dosed Bertrand Russell is the originator. 15) game type=WC and streak>3 and A.....11-5-1 ATS.....ON Texans.....this is 8-0-1 on Sunday, 7-2 SU (+8.3), with no historical results for a Monday game. Time is getting short....good fortune to all. Blessings, Indigo "Like sands through the hour glass, so it is with the days of our lives." The soap opera Days of Our Lives
Bryce Young is a keeper....great pocket presence, he doesn't get sacked, never really watched much of him previously....they have a chance to be better next season....get rid of Legette and get one more wide receiver.
If the seedings hold I'd make Seattle a 2.5 point favorite at home versus the Rams.....I'd take the Rams at that number.
We'll see what tomorrow brings.
0
Plays:
1) Panthers +10'.....winner
Bryce Young is a keeper....great pocket presence, he doesn't get sacked, never really watched much of him previously....they have a chance to be better next season....get rid of Legette and get one more wide receiver.
If the seedings hold I'd make Seattle a 2.5 point favorite at home versus the Rams.....I'd take the Rams at that number.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
