All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

***NFL WEEK 9 PLAYS***

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 43943
Posts: 214
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 2038
Posted: #176
Quote Originally Posted by PrimeTimeBoys:

Did you say the same thing about pats over cards?

How about the 49ers vs Vikings?

How about the Jags vs Ravens last year on Monday night?


i guess your not paying attention, this Arizona team is not the same team  that beat the pats in week 2 both on  offense and defense .
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 13343
Posted: #177
The roads teams are on fire:


Week 8: 10-4 ATS  (road teams by 6 games)

Week 7: 10-2-1 ATS  (road teams by 8 games)

Week 6: 8-6 ATS  (road teams by 2 games)

Week 5: 5-9 ATS  (home teams by 4 games)

Week 4: 11-3-1 ATS  (road teams by 8 games)

Week 3: 10-6 ATS  (road teams by 4 games)

Week 2: 4-11-1 ATS  (home teams by 7 games)

Week 1: 8-8 ATS  (evenly)



The road teams have out numbered the home teams when it came to covering the spread this season 5 week to 2 weeks & week 1 had it even..............will it regress back to the mean?? Possibly but imo, I dont think so...............

I like a lot of road teams this week...............  does the streak continue.....................
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 64
Posted: #178
Quote Originally Posted by shivaseven:

Quote Originally Posted by James_Dean:



Giants are also 0-4 ATS and 1-3 SU in their last 4 games right after playing the Cowboys.
[/Quote

I don't have those numbers. I've got ATS 1-3 and SUP 2-2 but with the ATS numbers it all comes down to the closing number.

You are ridiculous looking for trends on a sample size of 4 games if any of you knew something about statistics you should know you need a much bigger sample size than 4!! And the majority of 'trends' people post are based on 'after the event ' ... Try identifying one of these trends early and following it and having a solid record.. Noone posts about a trend that is 4-0 ATS and goes 10-0 ..people find trends that by chance have a great record and then think it will continue.. Do u think the Giants care that they played the cowgirls last week and now it means they 'can't' win by 4+ this week .. If Pitt cover this week it won't be because of that 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 264
Posted: #179
Fellas ...How are ya...been a while but you all know ......Cowboys pound em this is the Play to make haven't got a crazy bank roll so I will be conservative but this is one game to not pass on. BOL
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 460
Posted: #180
Quote Originally Posted by statsman49:

You are ridiculous looking for trends on a sample size of 4 games if any of you knew something about statistics you should know you need a much bigger sample size than 4!! And the majority of 'trends' people post are based on 'after the event ' ... Try identifying one of these trends early and following it and having a solid record.. Noone posts about a trend that is 4-0 ATS and goes 10-0 ..people find trends that by chance have a great record and then think it will continue.. Do u think the Giants care that they played the cowgirls last week and now it means they 'can't' win by 4+ this week .. If Pitt cover this week it won't be because of that 



You can't have it both ways! First you criticize me for posting STATS that have a small sample size. Then you criticize me for not taking an approach that identifies trends early. If I posted a trend that pointed to a NYG letdown after a Cowboy match say at an imaginary ATS of 31-10, you'd say that the numbers are stale and I should have been on this trend when it was say ... ATS 4-0. I'm not saying you don't make some interesting points but I can't win any kind of argument with the logic you are using. Also, I am big proponent of situational handicapping so I 'do' believe teams have let-down spots on their schedule. If PIT does lose it will probably be because their secondary is a major issue without TP on the field. Oh, here's another trend for you.

STEELERS with TP in secondary SUP 28-9
STEELERS without TP in secondary SUP 9-9

Maybe I should hedge  my bet and take the Steelers and the OVER so if PIT secondary gets shredded I'll catch the over.

 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 9317
Posted: #181
Quote Originally Posted by shivaseven:



You can't have it both ways! First you criticize me for posting STATS that have a small sample size. Then you criticize me for not taking an approach that identifies trends early. If I posted a trend that pointed to a NYG letdown after a Cowboy match say at an imaginary ATS of 31-10, you'd say that the numbers are stale and I should have been on this trend when it was say ... ATS 4-0. I'm not saying you don't make some interesting points but I can't win any kind of argument with the logic you are using. Also, I am big proponent of situational handicapping so I 'do' believe teams have let-down spots on their schedule. If PIT does lose it will probably be because their secondary is a major issue without TP on the field. Oh, here's another trend for you.

STEELERS with TP in secondary SUP 28-9
STEELERS without TP in secondary SUP 9-9

Maybe I should hedge  my bet and take the Steelers and the OVER so if PIT secondary gets shredded I'll catch the over.

 



The Steelers record without Palamalu and the Steelers record on the road have been on ESPN a few times this week, in other words they are widely recognized as being shit.

Yet.... books are juicing -3 for the Giants
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 1759
Posted: #182

hey pt

Recap all of your picks please!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I cant be scrolling through 9 pages of picks and idiots talking

can you compress your ind. picks into one posting??

thanks!

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 1044
Posted: #183
hahahahahah dumbass
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 1044
Posted: #184
dont bother dude is a poser he switches up picks and theres proof out here , Fraud Bitches thats that shit i dont like !
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 1044
Posted: #185
dumb fuck
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 1044
Posted: #186
bump ! dumb fuck ! LOL t(-.-)t PTB killaaaa whos with it
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 1044
Posted: #187
heres a play for you ptb B=====D~~~
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 20749
Posted: #188
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 941
Posted: #189
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 1044
Posted: #190
Quote Originally Posted by PrimeTimeBoys:

Buying out of my Ravens play........................found 2 system plays supporting the Browns when I didnt even think I had................jumped the gun too early but luckily im catching 3.5 with the Browns...............



Browns +3.5 (-110)  $1,100 to win $1,000


Gonna take the loss on the juice & possibly play the Browns in a few parlays.................

loser
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 460
Posted: #191
Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:



The Steelers record without Palamalu and the Steelers record on the road have been on ESPN a few times this week, in other words they are widely recognized as being shit.

Yet.... books are juicing -3 for the Giants


Good point. I've got the STEELERS +3 despite the fact they are 3-11 ATS on the road. Good Luck on the weekend
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 187
Posted: #192
you are more idiotic than me idiot
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 1534
Posted: #193
I like the Ravens bet. Good luck.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 5
Posted: #194
Quote Originally Posted by IgetMoney101:

Romos record in November is 19-2 straight up.

IgetMoney   Will u be posting ur picks before sundays games?  
                   
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 16
Posted: #195
Quote Originally Posted by PrimeTimeBoys:

+$1,800 last week.....................roll sitting at $31,800...........(-$30k for the year but gonna win it all back, stay tuned)

Updated wagers:


Ravens -3 (-120)   $1,200 to win $1,000  

Browns +3.5 (-110)  $1,100 to win $1,000  (bought out of Ravens play)

Panthers +3.5 (-110)  $1,100 to win $1,000

Broncos -3 (-120)   $1,200 to win $1,000

Bengals +3.5 (-110)  $1,100 to win $1,000  (bought out of my Broncos wager)

Cowboys +4.5 (-110)  $2,200 to win $2,000  (will also play the ML)

Eagles +3.5 (-110)   $2,200 to win $2,000  (will also play the ML)

Colts +2.5 (-110)  $1,100 to win $1,000  (will also play the ML)

Steelers +3.5 (-110)  $3,300 to win $3,000  (will also play the ML)

Jaguars +3.5 (-110)   $2,200 to win $2,000

Titans +3 (+110)  $1,000 to win $1,100

Tampa ML (+100)  $1,000 to win $1,000





Correct me if I am wrong. If you are down an imaginary $30,000 for the season and you add an imaginary $30,000, then you win an imaginary $1800, shouldn't you be up an imaginary $1800? I imagine covers will box me again for calling this guy a , but I fail to see how they haven't boxed this joker yet.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 13343
Posted: #196
^^^^^^^^^^


You must be retarded.....................
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 386
Posted: #197

Too many wagers yet once again.  PTB obviously lives in his grandma's basement with imaginary dollars.  Probably doesn't get out much and got no friends in real life.  So this covers thread is what his joy in life really is.

 Lets not take away his only joy in life and let him continue to be the biggest   and the joke in here.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 9375
Posted: #198
Quote Originally Posted by courtt44:

Too many wagers yet once again.  PTB obviously lives in his grandma's basement with imaginary dollars.  Probably doesn't get out much and got no friends in real life.  So this covers thread is what his joy in life really is.

 Lets not take away his only joy in life and let him continue to be the biggest   and the joke in here.


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 1403
Posted: #199
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 4403
Posted: #200
Quote Originally Posted by SCUZZYBUZZARD:



Correct me if I am wrong. If you are down an imaginary $30,000 for the season and you add an imaginary $30,000, then you win an imaginary $1800, shouldn't you be up an imaginary $1800? I imagine covers will box me again for calling this guy a , but I fail to see how they haven't boxed this joker yet.


Well they will never box PTB because of the amount of views he has. Yes everyone who lives in the real world knows he is a fraud but people come on to this threads to either hate on him or love him. I'd miss him if he left. I love see him losing his imaginary money. I mean whjo would ever tail a guy that has so far lost 30k and after the weekend looks a lot more..

Just enjoy the stupidity of the guy. I do..
All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.